Showing posts with label Erik the loony prof. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Erik the loony prof. Show all posts

Saturday, March 28, 2015

Erika makes an investigative funny.

Perhaps the strain of three posts in ten days is getting to New Albany's infamous faux academic.

Investigate?

Papa?

But her post isn't even about sports.

QUESTIONS FOR MR. MAYOR AND NEW ALBANY'S MERIT BOARD MEMBERS........

... Maybe it's time for Chris Morris of the News & Tribune to investigate what is going on here with the recent cutting of Officer Schook's pay and benefits...


Wednesday, April 09, 2014

Yes! Erika just endorsed me for mayor ... and she's got a boobery fixation, too.


No, really -- she did. In the breach, but hey -- any poseur in an electoral storm, right?

WHAT A SWEETHEART DEAL....

Our final thoughts on this contract:

Elect a boob and you get boobery.

Re-elect a boob and you get EVEN more boobery. Oy vey!

Anyone but Gahan and England in 2015.

There it is: "Anyone but." I resemble that remark, don't I?

Saturday, September 21, 2013

In which Erika decries bullying, plays Twister with her pink elephants and savors a Chesterfield.

I wonder who she's talking about now?

A BADGE OF HONOR....

This blog posting is the first of our personal opinions examining the impact of bullying on everyday people.

Bullying is different from constructive criticism or conflict, bullying is persistent, it focuses on a person rather than a real issue.

We consider an attack from a certain blogger as a "Badge of Honor."

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Aquatics bucks: This whole cost-benefit thing, and simple arithmetic?

The meat of Randy's post is a reconsideration of the numbers being floated as worthy of a banker's support for the aquatics center bond, which received its first positive council vote last Thursday.

Crippling Bond Issue Based on False Premises, by Randy Smith (The NewAlbanist)

 ... According to the newspaper of record, the Gahan administration is proceeding with plans for a $9 million aquatic center to be located at the failed site of the Camille Wright swimming pool off W. Daisy Lane.

Their professional design consultant, The Estopinal Group (and who else would you expect them to use?) says that a new outdoor facility can be expected to have 66,000 visits each year and to generate $932.000 in revenues. TEG asserts that the operating costs of the pool will not exceed $700,000 annually. Simple arithmetic yields a net revenue stream of $232,000 each year.

Oh, but that it were true.

The 6-3 vote in favor of moving forward is history. While retaining my overall doubts, I'll say that if we really must insist on defining our civic commitment to youth in terms of sports instead of brains, the greening of the squalid Hoosier Panel property makes better sense on multiple levels than the square-peg, round-hole aquatics center scenario; apart from serving as a bricks and mortar manifestation of mail order appendage enhancements in the context of the ongoing parks libido war between city and county, I fail to see the usefulness of the aquatics center.

Then again, I don't swim. The water gets in your beer, and it's plain nasty.

The most surprising aspect of last Thursday's pro-bond vote was the seeming exhaustion of the usual "no new spending" bloc. I've never seen such resignation going into a scrum; perhaps advanced age finally is taking its toll on the stalwarts. Like always, Erika Denhart rallied her troops -- and perhaps three attended. Her speech was Charlie Pride-laden boilerplate, and the vows of unceasing combat uncharacteristically hollow.

A handful of Republicans were collected, including Irv Stumler, who allowed himself to be taken down fairly easy by Dan "I'll have more of that drunken sailor expenditure, please" Coffey. Even the leather-jacketed former councilman, Steve Price, was unable to muster much of his patented oppositionist enthusiasm. Maybe they're preparing an ambush.

Until then, it would be nice to think that council persons like Scott Blair might contemplate whether the numbers really add up.

Friday, November 09, 2012

Meanwhile, in Floyd County, we remain tied and Mittigated.

Trying to find the bitterest beer in America? That's easy. It's whatever Romney voters are drinking this weekend.

Here is more commentary on the general theme of my post yesterday, in which I suggested that the GOP must adapt to (genuine) reality or perish.

Mitt Romney lost because hardline Republicans betrayed him: The Tea Party zealots, homophobes and misogynists hijacked Romney's campaign – and threaten the Republican party's future, by Simon Tisdall (Guardian).

... By campaign end, Romney – moderating his tone and positions – was finally connecting with 2012 America. GOP strategist Peggy Noonan called it Romney's "quiet rise", and there was evidence to support it. But the Tea Party zealots, the radical evangelicals, the homophobes, the misogynists and the rest of the unthinking, feckless right had already scuppered his chances. It was too late to turn it around.

Also at the Guardian, but only for statistics obsessives, is this painstakingly detailed analysis: How did Nate Silver predict the US election? A blogger called Nate Silver accurately called the outcome of the election. Biostatistician Bob O'Hara thinks he knows how.

At the New York Times: How a Race in the Balance Went to Obama.

Last, but entirely least, Professor Erika's post in Freedom to Screech (Yellow) selectively congratulates her winners, denigrates her losers, and expresses undying platonic love for her future mayor, Rebecca Gardenour. With President Obama re-elected, Erika declares her mission accomplished.

What was that about genuine reality?

Monday, June 04, 2012

Professor Erika's off his/her/its meds again, dancing naked at Linden Meadows.


Oh, dear. The crazy train's leaving the station again, and now it is heading for Shea Van Hoy's house.

LOCAL NEWS & TRIBUNE FAILS READERS ONCE AGAIN....

Yawn.

"Like throwing acid in a baby's face" is a far better descriptor of what it's like to read the anonymous rantings at Freedom to Screech, don't you think? After all, Linden Meadows actually could be reconverted to parkland for quite a bit less money than it would take to remediate the toxic waste at FOS.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

ON THE AVENUES: Faux thanks and reveries.

ON THE AVENUES: Faux thanks and reveries.

A weekly web column by Roger A. Baylor.

A self-appointed citizen’s activist lurches toward a bedecked podium. There, the winning candidate stands in readiness, basking in the glow of victory as he prepares to deliver his speech before family and friends.

The woman fondles an official, licensed Hillary Clinton charm bracelet, and it jangles all plastic-like as an indulgent crowd, one dreamy with a sense of possibility and a few too many Early Times and Cokes, graciously parts to allow her a clear path to the stage.

Her nicotine-stained fingers are wrapped tenuously around an aluminum can of the very best imported beer Italian lira can buy, at least in those old-school service clubs with ballrooms: Budweiser, a factory-brewed product of the multi-national wunderkind AB-Inbev -- once solidly American, now lost to foreign money amid the recovering stock portfolios of the 1%.

The woman shakily places the can of Budweiser on the floor off to the side, and gestures to the candidate. Confused, and not a little bit horrified, he considers the likelihood of far better beers being poured just down the street. Amid the gathered throngs, there is an odd, brief pause. Who is that woman, anyway? She seems lost, someone whispers. Is she really a professor, or does she just play one on the Internet? And why is she putting the beer can there?

Very soon, the moment passes. The woman cackles back into the rear of the hall, and her votive offering is ignored, to be consumed and recycled later by the facility’s janitor. The speech is made, and eventually, the celebration ends.

Somewhere in the city, a dog barks.

---

But enough about these purely imagined weird scenes in the post-election night of a New Albanian’s perpetually inebriated lifespan – it’s almost Thanksgiving!

A couple of years ago, before those humorless Alabama retirees demanded my newspaper platform be dismantled as punishment for my audacity in seeking local office, I stated that there’s never any better time than Thanksgiving for an iconoclast’s thoughts to be made public.

However, I soon learned the futility of expecting anyone to read such an outpouring of words on the holiday itself. Given the inability of most readers to proceed down any of my pages without scratching their heads in vocabularic confusion, it seemed almost impolite to expect them to waste valuable football viewing time in what surely would become a frustrating, household-wide search for seldom-used dictionaries and thesauruses.

And so, we’ll do it today. First, let’s revisit the notion of “iconoclast”:

1. A breaker or destroyer of images, esp. those set up for religious veneration (like the untended can of warm Budweiser stained by venom and tobacco).

2. A person who attacks cherished beliefs, traditional institutions, etc., as being based on error or superstition … rather like your humble correspondent.

While others grew up idolizing athletes and rock stars, my own heroes (Reggie Jackson, Keith Moon and George Clooney aside) have always been iconoclasts. From Socrates through Tom Paine, and not exempting 20th-century polemicists like H. L. Mencken, there’s nothing quite like an iconoclast taking a headlong swipe at unexamined assumptions.

Consequently, around this time each year, it is my duty to remind you that Thanksgiving, while perfectly enjoyable from a hedonist’s standpoint, and wholly conducive to this bibulous trencherman’s standards, actually stands for something more than gluttony and sports.

But that certain “something” isn’t the prevailing viewpoint that the Puritans and Natives once merrily gathered for a quaint New England picnic, pausing only occasionally from the consumption of corn chowder and non-alcoholic cranberry wine to pray to their respective deities for continued prosperity and happiness.

Rather, it is this:

The need for Christian apologetics aside, and whether or not Squanto miraculously facilitated a peaceful first Thanksgiving at Plymouth Rock, the subsequent history of the white man on the North American continent boasted the unabated slaughter of Native Americans, incessant pillaging of the environment, and an exculpatory doctrine of “manifest destiny” interwoven with prevailing Christianity, as intended to ease the consciences (if any) of those pulling the triggers.

We’ll leave the approval of African-American slavery emanating for many generations from Southern pulpits for another day of “thanks”.

In the context of genuine American history, and to the exclusion of mythology and wishful thinking, the holiday we term “Thanksgiving” is ironic, to say the least. I prefer reflections on all human history to be in accordance with the record, and as events actually occurred, without the tidying impulse to obscure and sanitize them.

I accept that people in all places and times do what they can with what they have, and believe that the best we can hope for is to learn from the past in the hope of learning worthwhile lessons and avoiding mistakes. In my opinion, the worst error of all is to misrepresent the historical record to justify theological needs.

Yes, I observe Thanksgiving, too. It’s just that I do it realistically.

•••

America’s Christmas shopping season appropriately commences on Labor Day, and it will reach a crescendo on November 25, which frenzied pop culture vultures have dubbed Black Friday. Pavlov’s overworked mutt can be expected to salivate continuously as fevered analysts seek to determine if holiday season retail sales will be sufficient to keep Wal-Mart, Best Buy and their suppliers in China solvent for another year.

At least there’s food on Thanksgiving. This year, it means a longer than usual ride across one of the remaining bridges to Louisville’s South End, and transformative dining at the venerable Vietnam Kitchen. Iconoclasm aside, I enjoy the traditional Norman Rockwell spread as much as anyone, but cooking it at home simply isn’t an option for us. Instead, we indulge in crisp spring rolls, exotic peppery noodle dishes and the occasional clay pot catfish, accompanied by India Pale Ale and French coffee for dessert.

After all, to each his own “tradition” – and may yours not be harmful to others.

(Elements within today’s column were “sampled” from my OSIN column of November 25, 2009)

Friday, January 21, 2011

My reflecting pool runneth over with beer.

It's awfully hard to select the week's funniest moment, amid mayoral press releases and the Vickster slapping herself on the back so hard that her cigarette hit the dirt floor of her hovel, but not to be overlooked is a Tribune letter to the editor from Shirley Ann Larner.
Neither Matthew Nash nor Roger Baylor will even be the real men who care about other people, like Dan Coffey and Steve Price, until they change their ways. I visited Roger Baylor’s business one time and was quite surprised that there was no reflecting pool, so he could look at his image all day. Maybe it was there, but it was just hidden away.
Shirley, I'm giggling all the way to the first post in quite a while at Citizens Faux Accountability.
SUDDEATH: So Professor, why do you keep such a low profile?

PROFESSOR ERIK: As you can see I'm African-American. Since most of my followers are bigots, I thought I'd "put on the Mask."
In other news, we've learned that Matt Nash didn't actually write his column today, and that recently deposed city council president John Gonder believes in mobility solutions that actually might solve problems instead of exacerbating them.

What was that, Mrs. Larner? I shouldn't use the word "exacerbate" in print, lest I give hormonal young men ideas which will render them blind?

Tell it to the historical society, will ya?

Friday, December 17, 2010

Ho ho, hum hum at Freedom to Screech.

Substantial portions of Erika's latest post appear to have been cribbed from the Internet sans attribution; here's a likely source at gotjokes.net. He/she thanks the "source" at the City-County Building, Nice try, but nope.

It's just a reminder of how very important "the rules" are until the pretend-prof decides to ignore them to make embittered propaganda points.

The Medicis would be downright embarrassed, Erika. I'm sure Berlusconi will pardon you, though.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Surprise entry in the city council caption contest!

"Maybe it's time for Lil Steve to put down his guitar, cut his hair and shave, so he can clean this city up."


Submitted by none other than Freedom to Screech's own trognonymous non-professor! And here we though she wasn't reading. Contest entries are still being accepted, but Erika obviously has pulled ahead of IAH. Submit your witticism here: It's time for another city council caption contest!

Previously: Caption contest: What Otis said.

Friday, June 11, 2010

Next Thursday, June 17 is Exclusively New Albany.

It's at the mayor's house, and so we're really not expecting to see Professor Erika there, but let it be known: Upon showing a valid ID to me properly identifying himself, I'll pay Professor Erika's way inside the fundraiser just for the fun of it.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Dreck from the Prof.

This quote should be elevated to the marquee of Freedom to Screech, where it would be a shining beacon of hope to the faux professor's followers.

For all you morons that voted for his (Obama's) Hope & Change we really hope you are suffering just as the majority of America is!
Until we all suffer as much as the disaffected troglodytes, they won't be happy. How utterly predictable. And: How entirely useless.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Take it from Rollen.

It's that old time championship rasslin' type of day when the Tribune's publishersteve tweets:

Hmm? To run Denhart letter next to Roger Baylor column tomorrow or not? Of course! That's why I manage a local newspaper and not Fox News.

Two can play this game.

What does the photo above have to do with any of this?

What did the man wearing the Afro wig ever do to land in prison?

And what about the rapture?

Read my column tomorrow and find out.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

LOL.

Cold day or hot, it's so simple that even a little person can grasp it, Erika.

You're neither democratic (lower case), nor a Democrat (upper case).

Accept these truths, and all your dissonance will disappear.

Friday, August 21, 2009

Monday, June 22, 2009

Freedom of Speech: The Lost Posting.

Like a particularly virulent form of acid reflux, there’s been much recent discussion in more dilapidated regions of the blogosphere lately as pertains to a very old topic (in more ways than one):

Who is “Professor Erik,” the supposed voice of screeching Luddite freedom in New Albany?

NAC asked V. A. Denschak, sole member of Citizens for Anonybility, to explain the relationship between her and the mysterious reclusive academic who is so often referenced but so seldom seen. Her answer is sung to the tune of “Whiskey Man,” from the 1960’s-era Who’s album “Happy Jack.” Sincere apologies to the late, great John Entwistle, writer of the song.

Erik is my friend, he's with me nearly all the time
He always joins me when I screech, and we get on just fine

Nobody has ever seen him, I'm the only one
Seemingly I must be mad, insanity is fun
If that's the way it's done

Doctors say he's just a figment of my twisted mind
If they can't see my Erik, well they must be going blind

Two men dressed in white collected me two days ago
They said there's only room for one and Erik just can't go

Erik – he will waste away if he's left on his own
I can't even ring him 'cause he isn't on the phone
Hasn't got a home

Life is very gloomy in my little padded cell
It's a shame there wasn't room for my Erik here as well

Erik is my friend, he's with me nearly all the time
He always joins me when I screech, and we get on just fine
Just fine


Join us later this week when we reveal new documents proving conclusively that both Erik and Harvey the Rabbit were cut from the same bolt of "pooka" cloth.