If I had never heard of New Urbanism … if the identity of the “creative class” had remained unrevealed … if I were to return to a dormant state of apathy with respect to public affairs … it would still make perfect sense to me that New Albany as a city might choose to encourage walking and bicycling as part of an overall program of public transportation alternatives that seeks to leave more cars parked, and fewer miles driven overall.
Imagine, then what it must feel like to take a leading role in promoting civic improvements like walking and cycling – in essence, to publicly espouse reforms in an effort to make the city itself a more livable and civilized place – when even the greatest gains accrued may not be sufficient so as to protect the advocates of change from harassment.
I’m not writing about myself in this context. It is widely known that I walk and bike New Albany’s streets on a daily basis, and do so at all hours, seldom giving the notion a second thought.
Then again, I’m a white male standing well over six feet, and weighing 235 lbs. Naturally, physical stature neither precludes violent acts nor negates harassment, but it does have a way of reducing problems.
All bicyclists have an intimate knowledge of the dangers that regularly emanate from passing autos, courtesy of inattentive, unskilled and sometimes crazed drivers. Being jacketed by several thousand pounds of metal is almost like drinking whiskey. It lowers inhibitions, and has a way of imparting behaviors that wouldn’t be attempted face to face, but seem charming and fun when practiced from an open window while speeding away from the scene.
If the occasional passing yokel is amused by baiting a man my size, just imagine what it must sometimes be like for potential targets of a more traditional nature: Our community’s women, gays and ethnic minorities, to name just three.
In the months and years to come, how many of them will be striving earnestly for a New Albany where greater walking and biking opportunities contribute to an enhanced quality of life, even as they recognize that they’ll not be able to take full advantage of these normal human pursuits owing to a stunted social and cultural milieu that extends well beyond the petty crime borne of familiar urban woes like drugs and impoverishment, into areas like public racism and overt homophobia?
It is tempting to note here that among the many disadvantages of the slumlord culture enabled by successive generations of local political officials as an expedient to fill the limitless vacuum left by visionless “leadership” is that it serves as the perfect support mechanism for the dysfunction perpetuated by downward immobility.
Instead, permit me to state simply that sexism, racism and homophobia are human right issues that pertain to numerous contemplated reforms at many levels, ranging from the examples provided above to the very essence of rental property inspections and reform.
The current mayoral administration has suggested at several junctures during the past three years that a revival of New Albany’s moribund Human Rights Commission might be in the offing, but so far, nothing has been done.
Now is the time. Is there the will?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Although the specific intent at the time may have been different, it's interesting to note the focus on housing as a human rights issue back in '74. I don't think the overall theme has changed much.
This would be my opinion, and mine only; but, I feel if the City "Administration" (whomever and whatever) would simply enforce the laws on the books about Building Code violations, we would not even be having this conversation.
Read the laws; understand the lack of enforcement (or as some say, selective enforcement). Why not enforce the laws and retrieve the monies through property liens, like normal cities?
Simply a broken window visible from the outside of an apartment building (could even be a home) -- warrants the Building Commissioner to inspect.
Personally, I do not want another layer of "government" on top of me -- I simply want the "ones" WE ALL PAY to do their jobs, according to the laws ALREADY on New Albany's books. How hard is it to write out the citations?
Wasn't there a community meeting held and if my memory serves me correct, over half the room "volunteered" to do the paper work the buildling commissioner at the time was complaining about.
It's up to US, the voters, to get the ones in there that WANT to enforce our laws. Let's just call it a "little less talk AND A LOT MORE ACTION, if you please".
A quick review of 2006, the last non-election year, from a human rights perspective:
Additional funding to save the average user about $3.50 a month on their sewer bill: More than $12 million
Additional funding to ensure clean, safe housing: $0
This must be where we must be to disagree bluegill. The Building Commissioner's Office HAS TO DO THEIR JOB... We give them monies for that, and more.
Post a Comment