Friday, June 17, 2005

Price to citizenry: I'm scared, and you should be, too

It’s a wonder that 3rd District Councilman Steve Price ever leaves his house.

Just think of all the problems out there in the real world, and how at any moment, without warning, things might go tragically wrong.

As he noted last evening, “lightning can strike.”

So can earthquakes, cyclones and droughts, and if the wrong mosquito bites you, it’s all over.

Food? Think of all the additives and chemicals, the undiagnosed allergies, the chicken bones down the throat, and that whole disgusting Wendy’s chili story.

What about traffic? You’re lucky to make it across the street alive. Any minute, some moron using a cell phone might swerve across the center lane … and then what?

As he approaches the threshold each morning, does CM Price question the efficacy of stepping outside into a world filled with inherent risks?

Does he pause, quavering at the prospect of the unthinkable, then crawl back into a warm bed to “look at the bigger picture?”

Such a reaction seems plausible, given that he has taken to regular expressions of fearful and apocalyptic caution at each and every city council meeting, usually at the precise moment that the words “Scribner Place” are mentioned.

We’ll leave the Pavlovian implications of Price’s jerking knee and ticklish larynx to those trained in the fields of psychology, sociology and Wal-Mart shopping.

Credit my unrepresentative representative for having completed a difficult mid-term transition, from clinging Coffeyite toady to cynically calculating practitioner of the political art of the scare tactic, which is designed to arouse groundless fears in the minds of voters, and then to cite these fears as evidence of the claim he is making.

Accordingly, New Albany’s “no progress at any Price” sect is happy to have Li’l Stevie as its council spokesman. Although council allies of the unreconstructed Brambleberries, apart from Price, remain on board the Luddite bandwagon, their public rhetoric has become increasingly muted, leaving him as the Ken Doll rallying point for the retrograde movement to 1948.

But what’s a rally without a flag?

From this point forward, any problem we face as a community will be hurriedly hoisted up the anti-Scribner Place flagpole to observe the reactions of the troglodyte populace. Here's their pitch:

Cataclysmic, once in a lifetime rainstorm … proliferating meth labs … sewer repairs …pot holes … teenage pregnancy … the alarming fact that we can’t find a really good Reuben sandwich at any of our downtown lunch spots?

Scary, huh? With problems like these, how can we afford Scribner Place, especially since they’re going to use your property taxes to pay for it?

See, look – the people are scared! Circle the wagons! Like that great Democrat FDR said, “we have nothing to fear but ourselves!

Of course, when the attention span of terrified residents begins to wane, yet another reason to be afraid will be substituted for the previous one, it will be linked directly to Scribner Place, up the flagpole it will go, and the process of disinformation will be repeated.

Set against this incessant refrain of negativity, there is the patient voice of City Hall, which does not explore the depths of our degradation, and does not conclude that we can’t, but instead, proposes to illustrate how we can.

That’s progressive.

Media Coverage of last night’s meeting:

Louisville Courier-Journal
New Albany rejects proposed subdivision on Kenzig Road, by Ben Zion Hershberg (short shelf life on Courier-Journal links).

New Albany Tribune
Plan proposes using property taxes to back up Scribner Place bond, by Amany Ali, Tribune City Editor.

An excerpt from the Tribune article:

Randy Smith isn't being fooled by anyone. And neither is Rick Carmickle. Both understand the meaning and purpose of a proposal for the city to use property taxes to back up a bond to fund a downtown development project.

Volunteer Hoosier (that'd be ... Randy Smith, who isn't being fooled)
Open Letter to Some Friends
Public Purposes

6 comments:

Joe said...

My first layered comment is that even the C-J's Hershberg didn't have the yarbels to call up CM Donnie Blevins and find out where the hell he was at. Did the latter duck the council meeting because he didn't want to vote on the proposed Kenzig Road development?

Moreover, why wasn't Atty Kraft, the snappy-dappy mouthpiece for the developers, savvy enough to notice Blevins' absence and ask the Council for a postponement of reading #3? Or was such a thing on its face not permissable?

I assume (yes, ASS U ME) that Blevins was on the 'yes' side of the 5-4 vote at the second reading. Even if reluctantly. And surely Mr. Kraft was as aware of the head count as anyone.

As a final piece of lint to fabric # 1... where the hell is Kenzig Rd. anyway. Is it near Capt. Frank Rd.?

# 2: the Amany piece, linked above, has me beyond baffled. Was this an editorial? If it was a "news" story, why the almost folksy flow of it, the blatant lack of objectivity, the snideness?

Once again {it seems to me} she would fit right in as a commentor on Laura Oate's blog, or even here... but as a journalist, oh yoy.

The New Albanian said...

On the first reading, Donnie Blevins passed, then changed to "yes," then voted "yes" on the second reading.

He obviously was struggling with it, but I'm not sure why.

Your question about John Kraft is a good one. Perhaps he could not move for postponing, which would account for Coffey's smugness.

na girl said...

Kenzig Rd is off State St past the interstate exchange. There a few houses on top of the hill and empty ground at the bottom of the hill where the road cuts through. In my opinion it is not exactly prime real estate due to large power lines located there.

What does a tie vote mean?

Maybe Mr. Kraft got exactly what he wanted last night.

Tim Deatrick said...

The message was clear when Bev Crumps pet project (Woods LLC) came up the first time before the revision debacle, NO TO THIS PUD !

The tie means it did not pass, now to prevent Crump's buddies and Kraft from bringing this back it needs to be stricken from the record totally, something the city council attny. Mr. Ulrich pointed out.

I agree with NA girl this was not a sound real estate development, it was geologically and ecologically unsound despite what the so called "neutral" engineers told the Plan Commission.

At leat CM's Coffey, Price, Schmidt and Kochert had the sense to reject it.

As to Blevins being absent, a dodge is easier than a vote.

bluegill said...

I'd be willing to pay an admission fee to hear any of the four no-voting CMs riff on the geological and ecological impact.

Tim Deatrick said...

if you recall Bluegill, aka Jeff Gillenwater, both Coffey and price talked about the run off and erosion issues when this came up the first time