Showing posts with label forums. Show all posts
Showing posts with label forums. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Floyd and Clark County Stonewall is sponsoring a 9th district Congressional Candidate Forum this Sunday, November 19.

I've decided to disengage from the 9th district congressional race, at least for while. It remains my hope to vote for a progressive candidate, a designation naturally excluding the incumbent Trey Hollingsworth from consideration.

Al politics is local, and my vote will be determined almost entirely by how Democrats, both as a party and as individual candidates, deal with (or without) Jeff Gahan's ongoing public housing putsch.

I await a sign. That's all there is to it, and when those tea leaves come together through the magic of computer animation to form a clenched fist, I'll be back.

Meanwhile, Floyd and Clark County Stonewall is sponsoring a 9th district Congressional Candidate Forum this Sunday, November 19. It will be held at the 300 Spring event venue in downtown Jeffersonville from 4:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.

With victories across America, November 7th was a great night for Democrats! We hope this portends good things for the 9th District.

We are SIX months away from Indiana's Democratic primary and Flark Stonewall is hosting a forum so we can get to know our candidates! All Democratic candidates for Indiana’s ninth district congressional seat have been invited to attend this forum and answer questions about issues that are important to the LGBT community and to local Democrats in Southern Indiana. While there will be a focus on LGBT issues, questions will range on many topics within the district and nation.

We hope you can submit a question and attend!

Interested parties may submit questions in advance of the forum, via Survey Monkey. Here's mine.

There has been no shortage of Democratic commentary about a Republican mayor's plan to displace low-income residents from the Pleasant Ridge neighborhood in Charlestown, and yet next to nothing has been said about a Democratic mayor's squalid moves to demolish half of the public housing in New Albany absent a credible plan to rehouse. Why the disconnect, and what do the candidates think about the public housing controversy in New Albany?

Monday, October 23, 2017

On this blogging day in 2007: Luddite testimonials and DNA's mayoral forum.

There were two posts on October 23, 2007. The first refers to the infamous and now entirely forgotten era of the Trog Blog Wars.

---

Okay, so I changed my mind ...sue me already.


---

The second posits the inconceivable (DNA being neutral about politics prior to its annexation by Deaf Gahan) grafted onto the "look how far we've ... er ... never mind." Stay tuned for 2019, when Deaf will dodge many of these same questions.

---

Reminder: "Develop New Albany to Host Mayoral Candidates Forum" on Wednesday night.

(From Develop New Albany)

Develop New Albany, the City’s non-profit, Main Street organization is hosting a Mayoral Candidates Forum to be held on Wednesday, October 24th from 7:00 - 9:00 pm at the Strassweg Auditorium at the New Albany-Floyd County Public Library.

The forum will consist of two 45-minute question-and-answer sessions with a 10-15-minute break in between. Mr. Randy Hubbard, Republican mayoral candidate, has agreed to participate in the first session and Mr. England, Democratic mayoral candidate, has agreed to participate in the second session which is anticipated to begin at 8:15 p.m. Neither candidate is invited to attend the session in which the opposing candidate is featured.

The sessions will be moderated by Greg Sekula, Develop New Albany Vice-President, and a series of questions will be asked by the moderator that relate to the issues of downtown and neighborhood revitalization. The public is invited and encouraged to attend.

The following topical issues are likely to be covered in the forum in no particular order:

1) Your vision for Downtown New Albany;

2) Strategies for furthering economic development in Downtown New Albany and surrounding older business districts such as the Vincennes and State Street corridors;

3) Addressing problems associated with rental housing conditions including absentee property ownership, illegally subdivided structures, and your position on a City-initiated rental housing inspection program;

4) Strategies for promoting and increasing homeownership and re-investment in older urban neighborhoods;

5) Relationships between the City and local neighborhood associations and non-profit groups;

6) Historic preservation, including the role of the Historic Preservation Commission, historic district designation, and design guidelines;

7) One-way vs. two-way street circulation patterns in the Downtown;

8) Enforcement of violations of City ordinances;

9) Aging infrastructure;

10) Upkeep of downtown streets and public spaces;

11) Ohio River Greenway project;

12) City-County Building space issues;

13) Relationship between the office of Mayor and City Council;

14) The role of public transportation in downtown revitalization and regional economic development;

15) Strategies for the City and school system to work together to strengthen inner-city schools and what impact that would have on downtown neighborhoods; and

16) Strategies for combating neighborhood crime, particularly drug activity.

For more information contact Develop New Albany at 812/941-0018 or e-mail here.

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

There will be a local forum for NAFC school board candidates at the Roadhouse on Thursday, October 13.

And Amanda herself is moderating.

Is a candidate's position on the Hibbard Referendum about to become a litmus test? Inquiring minds want to know. I intend to attend.

As a side note, I wonder if the Roadhouse has heard about that whole craft beer fad thingy yet? I'm not holding my breath.

BEAM: Learn about school board candidates at local forum, by Amanda Beam (News and Tribune)

... Beginning at 7 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 13, the (Floyd County Democratic Women’s Caucus) will host a panel featuring those running for the board of the New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School Corp. at the New Albany Roadhouse on Graybrook Lane. The discussion will follow their monthly business meeting which will start 30 minutes prior. The event is open to the public.

Members of the organization have submitted questions, and yours truly will moderate the discussion. Eight of the nine contenders on the ballot have said they will participate.

Each respondent will deliver an introduction, and then have two minutes to address the topic. Please note this is not a debate, but a session designed to inform voters on candidates’ views of issues in education today. After the panel, those participating will be able to mingle with voters and answer any additional questions.

Sunday, December 13, 2015

Usual suspects AWOL as C-J community discussion considers topics that make local politicians uncomfortable.



Yesterday's C-J-sponsored "community discussion" at the Carnegie Center was well worth my time.

3 takeaways from the CJ's S. Ind. community event, by Lexy Gross

... It was clear that people who attended The Courier-Journal's community discussion at the Carnegie Center in New Albany truly care about the residents in the community. Speakers from the Carnegie Center, Jesus Cares at Exit 0 and Metro United Way hit on the region's needs and engaged in discussion. About 30 people attended the event.

My favorite moment? Easy.

Regrettably, nary a cog in the Gahan nomenklatura was on hand to offer a rebuttal.

Barbara Anderson from Haven House Services Inc. in Jeffersonville discussed poverty and the community's ability to address it in the future. She decried New Albany's plan to help build a luxury apartment complex, despite the need to address affordable and public housing in the city.

Still waiting for YOUR local Democratic Party to display a pulse as it pertains to homelessness, affordable housing, income inequality and other topics that make the mayor blush?

Don't hold your breath.

Ain't happening.

The Mighty Oz was re-elected, the Wunderkind was promoted, and the pretend-luxury can proceed with real corporate welfare subsidies ... and without the pesky distractions of the real world.

Thursday, February 26, 2015

ON THE AVENUES: As Admiral Gahan steers his Speck study into the Bermuda Triangle, crewmen Padgett, Stumler and Caesar grimly toss all the rum overboard.

ON THE AVENUES: As Admiral Gahan steers his Speck study into the Bermuda Triangle, crewmen Padgett, Stumler and Caesar grimly toss all the rum overboard.

A weekly web column by Roger A. Baylor.


“(Two-way streets) are being driven by about a handful of people that want to be able to turn right onto Bank Street from Elm Street."
-- Bob Caesar (exact quote, 2013)

It happened last Saturday, during the second of three scheduled public exercises bizarrely dedicated to flaunting City Hall’s all-encompassing political cowardice, and which have been hailed somewhat euphemistically as “forums,” designed to extract input about Jeff Speck’s downtown street network reform proposals, while answering neither a single earnest question, nor clearing even the lowest imaginable bar in terms of overall public education.

City Hall evidently views these meetings as tactical exercises. You can tell by the abundance of white flags.

As the forum neared its end, and the ostensibly presiding Bored of Works began openly contemplating lunch, perennially bloviating civic value extractor Jim Padgett yet again took the podium to argue that because at some undetermined juncture on a far-off future day, a single Padgett truck might experience inconvenience by being forced to wait a few minutes to make a turn, the remainder of the city must be held in a condition of abject bondage, and forced to wait forever.

Why? Obviously, it’s because Padgett’s business interests, and the similar interests of a handful of fellow Ayn Randian trucking fetishists, far outstrip anyone else’s interest in New Albany, anyone else’s investment in New Albany, and anyone else’s plain presence in New Albany. It’s all about Padgett, not you or me.

Hence the extreme irony in Padgett’s narcissism, because if Speck’s street grid reform proposals miraculously are not sloppily aborted by the shameless pusillanimity of a City Hall frightened of its own cowering shadow, the measures are designed precisely to stimulate and speed along a municipal revival that already has been initiated with extensive private investment, and if thus abetted and for once genuinely supported, the revival eventually stands to inflate the value of Padgett’s own sadly misplaced downtown industrial properties, to an extent that his company might simultaneously relocate to a better transit location by an interstate somewhere (anywhere is fine – I hear Myanmar is wicked cheap in springtime), while converting his current acreage filled with machines and trucks into a massive redevelopment payday to benefit actual living people.

But this is New Albany, and increased value for all, as opposed to a few, is something to be feared and loathed, and so City Hall seems committed to a cynical strategy of taking any notion of hope fostered by the Speck study and tossing is like a scrap of rancid meat into the howling scrum, so that after we’ve all mauled each other, Jeff Gahan as Noble Squire can stride onto center stage and take credit for the healing “compromise solution” to a festering mess he has created.

It’s a cute Disney script, all right, but did Gahan ever receive the pressing memo about a revolution of rising expectations in the city’s historic core -- or did ranking minion David Duggins spot it first, lying there atop the toilet tank in the executive washroom, and suddenly realize that he might someday be held to a higher contemporary creative economic development standard than that which suffices to throw wads of endlessly reprintable taxpayer money at the smoldering tire tracks of an already departing Pillsbury?

Is so, then the memo probably got hauled away with the rubble of 922 Culbertson, never to be seen again.

---

Imagine the hilarity if I were to produce a blacksmith to lecture Padgett on the quality of his trucking fleet’s tires, prior to it being revealed that the blacksmith actually is a purveyor of twenty-mule teams.

On Saturday morning, Padgett amusingly played a desperation card from Bob “My Way Is the Interstate Highway Every Day” Caesar’s well-worn deck of antebellum Luddite tricks, referring somewhat vaguely to “research" dating to ancient times (2005), as compiled by the American Dream Coalition, which is a component of the Independence Institute’s Center for the American Dream.

Check out the donor list. It’s like a who’s who of crusted centerfolds in the magazines stashed beneath Kerry Stemler’s yellowed mattress.

The Independence Institute's Center for the American Dream opposes zoning in cities, and argues against Colorado's rail public transit initiative called Fastracks, saying that 'rail transit reduces the livability of every urban area in which it is found.'

The American Dream Coalition is a predictably vapid yawner from a Potemkin think tank, deploying the same cooked data once solemnly cited by a caterwauling Caesar at a forgettable city council meeting, as lifted at the time from something outlandishly called the Thoreau Institute. The tired screeds are aynonymous because there is a common shill to these oligarchy front groups, a fellow named Randal O'Toole.

Randal O'Toole's self-styled 'Thoreau Institute' lies at the core of his ferocious jihad against urban planning, Smart Growth, New Urbanism, public transport, and rail transit (a jihad that he also promotes through spin-offs and front groups such as his American Dream Coalition).

That’s right. This is what passes for scholarship in Nawbony, where men are men and sheep managed higher SAT scores.

Isn’t it fascinating that as City Hall incessantly soft-pedals the culturally transformational aspect of Speck’s study in favor of wonkishly insisting that Larry Summers patiently explain induced demand as part of Gahan's tragic ORBP pass-through rationale, the city’s Neanderthal right-wingers are cutting straight to the chase and instigating culture war as their pre-emptive reply?

The simplest way to debunk O’Toole’s cockamamie one percenter’s fodder is to consider what motivates him and his various, proliferating “research” institutes: Gobs of money from the very same oil, automotive and construction interests who profit the most from the roadway status quo, and who happily fund entities like the American Dream Coalition.

Apparently they’re everywhere.

“Right-wing billionaires, corporations and the Bradley Foundation pay for junk studies that prop up their agenda”

A handy analogy can be seen in the realm of climate science. There are legitimate climate scientists who follow the evidence where it takes them, because they’re being paid to be climate scientists. Then, there are those scientists who are paid to return a verdict against the evidence produced by the legitimate climate scientists.

You know, the ones paid to be political pawns.

In terms of analogy, professional planners like Jeff Speck must be numbered among the former. They are remunerated for their expertise, and run the numbers to see where reality leads them. It’s what Speck did in his study of New Albany.

For-hire polemicists like O’Toole can be classified among the latter. Their wheels are greased to provide “facts” that favor one-way streets and auto-centrism, and obligingly, they manufacture them, so that otherwise intelligent individuals like Padgett, Caesar and Irv Stumler can muster the flimsiest possible backing to declare culture war against modernity.

Impenetrable ironies never cease in New Albany. Stumler slavishly agrees with Padgett, as does Caesar, which is the best indication that ideologically, all three are pure, unadulterated Republicans, and yet as we recall, Stumler ran for mayor as a Democrat four years ago, and in 2015 opposes Caesar as a Republican in the 2nd district council race.

That’s right, you abused, long-suffering residents of the 2nd district: Both of your declared council candidates unalterably oppose street grid reform, which means both of them reject enhanced economic development in the core and renewed quality of life in our neighborhoods. It doesn’t matter which one of them wins; either way, you’ll be faced with governance by old and stodgy white males who look to places like Eritrea Haiti and Mississippi for free-market inspiration.

It looks like throwback time for the 2nd district; all the way back to open sewage ditches, leeches and lynchings in the middle of one-way streets for YOU, unless a principled independent candidate can be found, and quick.

Please try to find one.

---

I almost forgot, but only because he’s so recurringly and incompetently forgettable.

In September of 2013, the News and Tribune’s Chris Morris supposedly helped author an editorial strongly supporting two way streets and street grid reform.

Yesterday he published a column expressing alarm that the hoity-toity book readers might be allowed to steal a march on his preferred milieu of father-figure-icon-worshipping datedness.

NAC promptly polled folks in Iceland, and we couldn’t find anyone there who is surprised at Morris's flip-flop, either, although a woman in Hveragerði questioned whether Morris had actually bothered to read Speck’s Downtown Street Network report.

Silly Icelandics. Of course he didn’t read it. It isn’t about sports, is it?

Put Speck on a baseball card, and maybe then … nah.

---

Recent ON THE AVENUES columns:

ON THE AVENUES: Upscale residency at down-low prices.


ON THE AVENUES: Street “sweeping” epitomizes the degradation of governance in New Albany.


ON THE AVENUES: Got spa? Time for CM Zurschmiede to reel in the years.

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Elections are for losers: Malysz subs for Gahan at NAACP forum.

NAACP meeting bullet points: Firefighter hiring, housing strategies, who didn't show up, and who did.

NAACP members question employment standards during forum in New Albany; Gahan criticized for not attending meeting, by Daniel Suddeath ('Bama Radio and the Big Pop-Up)

Though city, county and state officials attended, members of the New Albany chapter of the NAACP used the bulk of their questions to ask about New Albany issues ...

... (Mayor Jeff) Gahan wasn’t present for the forum, and that drew some critical remarks from a few of those in attendance. New Albany resident and NAACP member Marcia Booker said there have been instances of city fire department and street department workers not following employee guidelines, and that the issue “has been brought to the mayor’s attention” without a resolution.

“It’s like he promises he’s going to correct a situation, but nothing ever happens,” said Booker of Gahan, who entered office Jan. 1.

For those who persist in thinking that Doug England no longer serves as mayor, the chutzpah-laced symbolism of the following is instructive:

Community Housing Initiatives Director Carl Malysz attended the meeting on behalf of Gahan, and wrote down a list of questions and comments including those made by Toran and Booker that he said he would present to the mayor ...

Having weathered the transition from England to Gahan, tipped the troglodytes into apoplexy, and resumed attending meetings as official agent of the ruler, surely Carl's up for a new, more descriptive title. We like this one: Keeper of the Compromising Photos.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

City council candidate forum: Vote for the ones who showed up.

The IU Southeast College Democrats staged a New Albany City Council Candidates: Meet, Greet and Question Panel on campus last night.

8 out of 15 council candidates attended, and each of them had his or her moment. In my view, the clear "winners" were Greg Phipps (3rd district) and Randy Smith (5th district). In strictly objective terms, their answered illustrated to triumph of intelligence over karaoke and bloodlines.

Props are due to Jeff Gahan for being the only mayoral candidate bothering to attend the event. Of the city clerk candidates, I saw Vicki Glotzbach, too.

Naturally, It would have been interesting to see how the seven absentee candidates would have answered wht proved to be very goodand insightful questions -- which almost certainly is why they stayed away.

Here is the link to the complete video: 2011 city council candidate forum.

(Tribune coverage whenever their act comes together later today)
Coverage by Harold Adams at the Courier-Journal

Monday, August 23, 2010

Small business, regionalism, and Rep. Clere's public forum tomorrow.

Rep. Ed Clere is hosting a Small Businesses public forum tomorrow (Tuesday, August 24 from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the Purdue Technology Center, 3000 Technology Avenue, Suite N2225, Conference Room, New Albany, IN 47150.

According to the material I received, "This forum will be geared toward small businesses in New Albany and its surrounding metropolitan area ... small business owners and those interested in starting a new business are encouraged to attend the public forum. They will be given the opportunity to discuss issues concerning the process of starting or growing a business ... some of the discussion items include: Strategic Planning, Market Research and (understanding) Financial Reports ... Rep. Clere and members from the local and state offices of Indiana Small Business Development Center will be available to answer questions and address any concerns."

Sounds interesting. I'm not sure I can attend owing to a prior commitment, and so if anyone reading makes it, can you please ask this question of the experts in attendance:

"As a small business owner, what should I do when an appointed (not elected) extra-governmental agency establishes tolls for Ohio River bridges, thus discouraging a significant number of patrons to come to Indiana?"

Thanks.

Monday, May 17, 2010

RemCha: "A time to talk about starting a Mayoral forum in New Albany."

RememberCharlemagne has come forward during comments at last Friday's NAC post ... Matt Nash is Right: "The Price is Wrong" ... to reveal solid information that otherwise might pass unnoticed. That's why I'm elevating RemCha's comment to the marquee.

If you what to make a positive difference Carl confirmed a time to talk about starting a Mayoral forum in New Albany. The meeting will be 2:00 p.m. Tuesday at the city county building. I would hope other people see the importance of such a forum and will support this issue. If you can't make it post a comment on here and I'll rely the message to the Mayor.
I assume he means tomorrow afternoon. Interested in passing your thoughts along via RemCha? Use the comments section at "The Price is Wrong," or start a new thread here.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Livable Louisville Public Forum is Tuesday, March 30.

(press release ... I'm hoping to attend)


March 12, 2010

Contact: Branden Klayko

Livable Louisville Forum to unite city’s leading urban thinkers


Panel discussion about Louisville’s greatest opportunities and challenges

Louisville, KY – Join experts in the fields of urban planning, architecture, development, transportation, and sustainability as they discuss the interconnected forces that will shape Louisville’s future. The panel discussion and multimedia presentations will be enlightening and thought provoking.

The Forum will be held at the Clifton Center (2117 Payne St.) on Tuesday March 30th from 6 to 7:30 PM, and will be preceded by a reception beginning at 5 PM. There will also be a post-forum gathering at Clifton’s Pizza where attendees can ask for an “L2” drink special.

This event is free and open to the public. Seating is limited, so everyone is encouraged to reserve their seats and learn more at www.LivableLouisville.org.

Moderating the lively discussion will be LEO Weekly’s Editor Sarah Kelley. The esteemed panelists include:

• Gill Holland, Entrepreneur, Developer, and Film Producer
• David Morse, Transportation Advocate
• Steven Sizemore, Urban Planner
• Bill Weyland, Real Estate Developer
• Steve Wiser, AIA, Architect and Historian


The Livable Louisville Forum is presented by Broken Sidewalk and LEO Weekly. The 5 PM Reception is generously sponsored by Heine Brothers Coffee and Bluegrass Brewing Company.

Remember, Keep Louisville Weird!

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Clere-ly educational forum at Destinations this morning?

Coupled with a busy week and no small measure of personal sloth, my LEO column deadline yesterday (finally met roughly one hour ago) prevented attendance at this morning's educational legislation forum with Representative Ed Clere at Destinations Booksellers. There'll be another one next week, but in the interim, if you attended and have a report, please regale us.

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

Ask Rep. Ed Clere in person ... at a town hall meeting coming soon to a venue near you.

From Representative Ed Clere, a schedule for three town hall meetings, and your opportunity to ask him in person why the property tax caps he favors discriminate in favor of rental property owners:

9:30-11:30 a.m. Saturday, April 11, S. Ellen Jones Elementary School

6:30-8 p.m. Friday, April 17, Purdue Technology Center

6:30-8 p.m. Tuesday, May 5, Hoosier Room, Indiana University Southeast

The legislative session ends on April 29, so the first two will be prior to the end of session, and the third will be a post-session wrap-up.


Here's more on the topic, as published in the Tribune:
CLERE: Let’s have a chat

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Open thread: Neighborhood forum of February 11, 2009.

Newspapers are different from blogs for a number of reasons, among them the nasty reality of the deadline. Accordingly, my hunch from the beginning was that last evening's neighborhood forum would be little different from previous meetings, and so I wrote my Tribune column last weekend with a larger picture in mind.

BAYLOR: Stand united, fall divided

While listening to the proceedings, I found myself thinking about the gaping chasm between the ability to think, which prefaces every achievement in human history on planet Earth, and the default sensory mechanism whereby a rubber mallet striking the knee causes the lower leg to stand at attention.

So much has been discussed in this and other venues. Co-editor Bluegill has observed on numerous occasions that neighborhood revitalization must proceed with desired outcomes in mind. Earlier in the week, reader Brandon Smith offered much the same outline, suggesting that support be rallied for certain desired outcomes irrespective of ideology on the part of those advocating for it.

My column today argues that without the messy work of grassroots organization in neighborhoods throughout the city, and a shared sense of purpose, little of substance will be accomplished in reaching these desired outcomes. As was the case last night, concerned residents are capable of articulating matters that are symptoms of the problem, but for so long as we settle for temporary solutions, we'll all be back at the same place in another year saying the same thing again, and hoping that somehow in the end, there will be a difference.

Isn't that the clinical definition of insanity?

Look, I'm not trying to be difficult here, and I'm not criticizing anyone except those deserving of it, like our perennially clueless 3rd district councilman Steve Price, who can sit through two hours of earnest discussion about neighborhood revitalization and conclude that if we only had a licensed garbage transfer station, all would be well. This is a staggering feat of willful non-comprehension, but give him his due: He does have a desired outcome in mind, albeit one where a dumpster would be positioned for him to accept a decrepit patio chair when the people next door complain about it.

Yes, that's all the vision mustered by the typical houseplant, although it does qualify as vision. It should serve to illustrate the virulence of the obstructionism that we're up against, and it should suggest very strongly that the time to plan, to organize and to raise money is now.

That's enough of my tilting. If you were there, please post a comment and give readers your impressions.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Again looking back to 2006 ... and where are we now?

On Tuesday, a neighborhood forum from 2006 was referenced with a link to Ted's notes. Back in July 25, 2006, we previewed the same forum here:

Person to person: Neighborhood Forum is Wednesday, August 9; Study Circles discussed.

Much to the chagrin of certain anonymous denizens of the benumbed local trogosphere, specifically those who can’t be bothered with conceptual thinking and the realm of ideas even as they hilariously pretend to be academics trained to think and act in these terms (see:
TheNuttyProfessor.edu), a spirited dialogue continues to assist in the gradual transformation of New Albany.
Another posting loosely related to forums from the same period (9/2/06), this time courtesy of Bluegill, who illustrates how some local grandstanders have sought to intervene in neighborhood activism for their own aggrandizement:

I'll take city attorneys for $150K, Alex.

Dan Coffey wants to hire a full-time city attorney. For those of us in attendance at the neighborhood forum during which he berated citizens for considering that very same measure as a potential aid to code enforcement, Coffey’s suggestion of following through with the full-time attorney idea should seem surprising. But it’s not. We know Dan Coffey.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Neighborhoods: Organize or fail.

Spinning off yesterday's conversation, Ted passed along this link to notes he took at a neighborhood forum in 2006, with relevant ideas still hanging:

Meeting Agenda - Tuesday 8/15 - Forum Meeting Notes

My Thursday newspaper column has been dispatched. Yesterday's points are well taken, and I'm in agreement when it comes to these ultimate goals and strategies necessary to get from here to there. My personal obsession is the ground game, i.e., what must be done to assemble the components of a politically viable, broader based movement. Specifically, it's promoting a superstructure of unity much like the council mentioned by Chris. Without collective action, there will be continued stalemate.

Note that nowhere in this am I proposing that existing neighborhood associations endorse candidates or do anything to suggest picking favorites. Furthermore, we know that neither political party is going to take a stand (we'd be pleased as punch if one or the other did). I'm suggesting that if we're organized and disciplined, the political choices won't need to be said aloud. It will be obvious who's in, and who's out.

The current example of ROCK should be sufficient illustration as to how a local lobby group can lawfully punch above its weight. Note that while ROCK's root cause is sex, its tagline pertains to preserving property value through ordinance enforcement.

Sound familiar?

The neighborhoods must do many things to succeed, but they cannot succeed separately. They must be able to wield sufficient power to make the ward heelers take notice. Whether Wednesday's forum will be any different from previous ones is yet to be determined, and yet, how many of these are we prepared to attend before we begin to learn from the past?

Discuss if you wish. I must go and be a capitalist for a while.

Monday, February 09, 2009

Open thread: Issues for the neighborhood forum.

In anticipation of the neighborhood forum this Wednesday evening, I'm writing a Tribune column to be published on Thursday. In an effort to assuage damaged psyches, I promise not to mention Europe a single time. Rather, the topic will be the single most important requirement to achieve success in revitalizing the city's neighborhoods, and it occurs to me that this might make a good open thread to greet the week.

As proffered by the forum's organizers, here's a list of agenda items.

  • Current experiences and problems in the city and neighborhood
  • Ideas for improving “quality of life”
  • City and neighborhood safety
  • Code enforcement
  • Proactive neighborhood involvement
  • Vision for the city and neighborhoods
  • Street concerns

Which of these is most important? What are the preconditions for success? Why has there been so little forward movement over the past five years ... or has there been forward movement?

And: Who owns the decrepit bench pictured above? It's on the city's sidewalk. Anyone know?

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Neighborhood Forum to be held on Wednesday, February 11.

It's a testament to "fair and balanced" that the neighborhood forum organizers are staging an event dedicated to the proposition that something can be done, and have invited Steve Price to explain why nothing can be done.

---

Neighborhood Forum
Wednesday, February 11th @ 6:30 p.m.
Central Christian Church (corner of East Spring and 13th Streets; please use side entrance off the parking lot)

Organized by: The East Spring Street Neighborhood Association

Guests and brief introductions from:


Doug England – Mayor, City of New Albany
Greg Crabtree – Chief, New Albany Police Department
Pam Badger – Code Enforcement Officer – City of New Albany
Steve Price - 3rd District Councilman
Matt Denison – President – Board of Public Work and Safety
Mickey Thompson – Street Commissioner - Street Department

Forum will then be for resident input, concerns & discussion regarding:

  • Current experiences and problems in the city and neighborhood
  • Ideas for improving “quality of life”
  • City and Neighborhood Safety
  • Code Enforcement
  • Proactive Neighborhood Involvement
  • Vision for the city and neighborhoods
  • Street concerns

For more information, please contact: president@eastspringstreet.org or gregoryroberts@insightbb.com

This forum is open to anyone interested in building stronger neighborhoods and a better city!

Saturday, December 06, 2008

The 2nd Annual 8664 Forum is on Wednesday, December 10.

The 2nd Annual 8664 Forum, a free event, takes place next week. I spoke with Tyler Allen yesterday, and with luck, the New Albanian Brewing Company will be one of the forum's sonsors.

---

8664 Forum
Muhammad Ali Center,
144 North 6th Street
Wednesday, December 10th, 2008
5:30 p.m.: Reception
6:00 - 8:00 p.m.: Presentation and Q&A

Featured speakers include:
Cary Moon, Director
People's Waterfront Coalition
Seattle, Washington

John Norquist, President
CNU.org
Former Mayor of Milwaukee, WI

Please RSVP TODAY!

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Sustainable City Series forum on adaptive reuse at the Glassworks, Dec. 4.

Don't forget that RSVPs are required to attend. Thanks to DC for reminding us. Here's the original text accompanying the poster.

---

I want to let you know that the seventh forum of the Sustainable City Series, ADAPTIVE REUSE, will be held on Thursday, December 4th beginning at 6:00 pm at Glassworks ( 815 W Market Street ).

Professional architect Carl Elefante has said, “the greenest building is the one already built.” This statement reflects the notion that as old buildings outlive their original purpose, the lifecycle costs, embodied energy; sustainable advantages of waste reduction, and the benefit of maintaining historic architecture in many cases make it more efficient and environmentally responsible to redevelop them. Adaptive reuse reduces sprawl, preserves neighborhood character and makes our city more sustainable.

The forum on December 4th will look at the benefits of reusing our existing buildings from large scale buildings like Glassworks and vacant big box stores (think Wal-Mart, Krogers, etc), to our older residential neighborhood homes. Please join us on December 4th for an engaging discussion on how we can make our city, region, and the world more sustainable.

Ramsi's Café on the World will be providing food for the event and coffee will be provided by Heine Brothers Coffee.

This event is free to the public, however space is limited, so if you or anyone else is interested please go here to RSVP and reserve your seat for the December 4th event.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

"A greater sense of community and more civic involvement" are two prominent reasons.

It would appear that the Louisville Independent Business Alliance’s “Why Buy Local?” forum Sunday was a success. The senior editor was too ill to attend, but here’s the link to Courier-Journal coverage, with a selected excerpt.

'Buy local' wins backers; Louisville alliance launches campaign, by Laura Ungar.

Speaker Stacy Mitchell of Portland, Maine, senior researcher at the Institute for Self Reliance and author of "Big Box Swindle: The True Cost of Mega-Retailers and the Fight for America's Independent Businesses," put the issue into a national context.

She said America has lost 400,000 independent retailers in the past 10 years. In the grocery sector, for example, the top five companies received $1 of every $4 Americans spent on groceries in 1998, compared with $1 of every $2 today. Wal-Mart stores alone, Mitchell said, capture $1 of every $10 Americans spend on goods.

"Every category is dominated by a couple of chains," she said. "We've gone too far in one direction. We need to think about rebuilding our communities and rebuilding local businesses."

Earlier in the article, Ear X-Tacy’s John Timmons makes an absolutely essential observation about the task for small businesses:

"I can't compete on price. I can't even try to do that anymore," he said. Instead, he said, he fights back with service, expertise and selection.

Yes. Yes. And, yes.

Meanwhile, at-large councilman John Gonder takes a circuitous route to the same general vicinity in his most recent blog posting, We Should Be So Lucky.

We can't shop our way out of a jam. We won't move civilization closer to perfection by leaving our problems to the ingenuity of future generations to solve, as many are trying to do now with property taxes, climate change and the growing subservience of individuals to corporate interests.

Literacy and thoughtfulness in an elected official? Unfortunately, John may come to regret attribution here in Anonymous Rights Land.

By the way, a belated happy birthday to John’s mom!