Showing posts with label Ethics Commission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ethics Commission. Show all posts

Saturday, September 14, 2019

Scammers, fraudsters, and the task of "Un-Corrupting City Hall."


This long read helpfully explains why New Albany's Ethics Commission was stillborn.

Un-Corrupting City Hall, by Ethan McLeod (CityLab)

These cities all suffered notorious municipal scandals. What have officials and voters done to tackle corruption and keep it from happening again?

H. Philip West Jr. breathed a sigh of relief in June when Providence’s 294-room Graduate Hotel decided to remove the portraits of Vincent “Buddy” Cianci from its guestrooms. The longtime mayor, who died in 2016, is an iconic character in the Rhode Island capital’s history. But as far as West is concerned, Cianci is a stain on Providence—one that he’s spent years trying, unsuccessfully, to scrub away.

It was only five years ago that Cianci—out of prison after a racketeering conspiracy conviction in 2007 and twice forced to resign from office due to felony convictions nearly two decades apart—mounted a third run for mayor. He lost, but West, former director of Common Cause Rhode Island, was still troubled to see him draw 45 percent of the vote.

“When you’ve dealt with such a brilliant scammer and fraudster, how can you convince people that they should not support him? I’m not sure you ever can,” says West, who helped write a new city ethics code and create a municipal investigatory body after Cianci’s 2001 indictment. “Ultimately you just have to say, ‘We’re going to build a structure that’s going to hold anybody who’s elected going forward accountable.’”

That’s the same pledge that voters and leaders have made in other places where civic corruption has been a chronic issue. Weary from national embarrassment and seeing history repeat itself, cities like Baltimore, New Orleans, and Chicago have responded to political scandals with charter overhauls and executive orders, empowered independent investigators to probe corruption, and challenged problematic local political traditions.

But successfully leading a wave of reform can be a tall order, with human nature and deeply entrenched political culture standing in the way. “This is about personal greed,” Tim Krebs, chair of the University of New Mexico’s political science department, says. “As long as you have human beings in government, you’re not going to be able to root [corruption] out entirely.”

Boosting oversight doesn’t always work, and for some, the jury is still out as reforms await testing. But in cities large and small, when voters and officials commit to challenging corruption and embracing transparency, they’re seeing results.

Examples are offered from Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit, Greater Los Angeles and New Orleans, before the narrative turns back to Providence.

The Providence Ethics Commission didn’t actually meet until 2015 ... West said he’s proud of the ethics code and other reforms he helped with, but is bothered that he hasn’t yet seen the commission enforce the new rules for any violations. “With a power, you can’t really know what it is until you exercise it and you find out what the resistance is. I really can’t say that they’ve got decent enforcement power until I see that they’re using it.”

The coda.

“It takes a long time to build good government, and sadly, a clever, corrupt official can do great damage in short time,” he says. “Until those people retire and are gone, corruption will still have its presence, its taint.”

Wednesday, December 06, 2017

Ethics, human rights commissions remain conveniently disabled as Team Gahan, Coffey run amok.


Yesterday we examined the inspiring entrepreneurial success of Copperhead's Valet Parking, which leveraged the little-known Cronyism Director's Exemption (CDE) into a sweet puddle of beak-wetting for the councilman whose thirst is never satisfied.

In a dramatic semi-literate letter to city council, former redevelopment bag man Duggins accepts responsibility for Coffey's harvest cash-coming car park cronyism caper.

In strikingly similar fashion, early last month it occurred to all and sundry that one pathway toward contesting Jeff Gahan's hostile takeover of public housing had been misplaced and was nowhere to be found.

November 5, 2017: UPDATE: A Human Rights Commission would come in handy given the public housing putsch, but the same lawyer who wrote the belly-up human rights ordinance now sits on the public housing board. Now that's New Gahania.

So much for CM Phipps' sole legislative achievement in six years. Of course, there is another fake facade erected amid back-slapping fanfare by Team Gahan, only to be just as quickly stuffed into a body bag.

March 27, 2015: On the trail of the Phantom of the Ethics Commission.

So, how does one file a complaint with the Ethics Commission? Or, for that matter, the Human Rights Commission? As suggested the last time this dysfunction was assessed here at NAC ...

Step 1. File ethics complaint concerning city attorneys who won't answer questions about filing ethics complaints. LOL. Sometimes I look at the tragedy and comedy masks laying there together and I just don't know which one to choose. -- Bluegill 

We already know the human rights and ethics commissions were designed to serve as lipstick on the pig. Gahan might have tolerated their creation, though solely as self-congratulatory passages on a press release or campaign flier.

Apart from the usual propaganda, there was not ever a desire on Gahan's part for human rights and ethics commissions to be functional in any meaningful sense; given the mayor's incessantly nurtured cult of personality, it's absurd to believe a politician who genuinely believes he is perfection incarnate would submit to cross-examination by the rabble.

The clique keeps right on clacking,and when it comes to monetization and influence peddling, the Astroglide corporation's owner can afford a second vacation home in Majorca off Gahan's monthly orders alone.

As Bluegill observed yesterday about the Duggins-Coffey lovefest:

Given that procedural rules and perhaps even laws were broken, anybody want to hazard a guess what the punishment will be (other than a promotion and salary increase)?

Friday, March 27, 2015

On the trail of the Phantom of the Ethics Commission.


So, how does one file a complaint with the Ethics Commission?

Well, when the information cannot be found on the city's website, you send notes to both city attorneys, and when they don't reply promptly, you take to Facebook to ask your council representatives (3rd district and all three at-large), and when one of them (Kevin Zurschmiede) helpfully provides at least part of the answer, he routes it through a third party e-mail, after which the council person originally responsible for the idea of an ethics commission concedes its conceptual inadequacy.

This, my friends, is the essence of chronic malfunction hereabouts.

Step 1. File ethics complaint concerning city attorneys who won't answer questions about filing ethics complaints. LOL. Sometimes I look at the tragedy and comedy masks laying there together and I just don't know which one to choose. -- JeffG

Is there an Ethics Commission, or not?

As of 2013, the Ethics Commission apparently existed, because according to the newspaper, it declined to hear a complaint brought by Randy Smith, although it's unclear to me whether this information ever was conveyed to him apart from the newspaper's citation.

Zurschmiede's reply yesterday is much appreciated. It takes the form of an e-mail forwarded to council members by Matt Lorch, dated January 7, 2013. The Ethics Commission appointees are listed by point of origin (vitals omitted), followed by Lorch's explanation of how the ball would be set rolling.

City of New Albany Ethics Commission Appointees

Floyd County Bar Association: Claire Hagedorn, Attorney, LORCH & NAVILLE, LLC

Hope Foundation: Doug Grant, Pastor

NAACP: John Malone, Sr.

Rauch Incorporated: Ron McKulick, CEO - Southern Seven Workforce Initiative

United States Post Office – Postmaster: Stephen Kiger, Executive Director at The Salvation Army Southern Indiana

Further background comes from John Gonder.

Roger: I was the sponsor of the ordinance establishing the Ethics Commission. As one might expect the ordinance passed unanimously. The commission members worked earnestly and diligently to bring forth the ethics rules the commission would follow. This happened during the early days of the Human Rights Commission. While these two commissions are in no way connected, I mention it because I felt that the Ethics Commission was headed in the direction of a feel good empty gesture. Too many ordinances are drafted, enacted, and then ignored. Although I felt, and still feel the aims of an Ethics Commission are worth pursuing, I personally made the call to not pursue it because I've seen too many ordinances address a need, get peoples' hopes up, maybe even win a few votes, but then lay idle in the ordinance book. I didn't want to go down that path on such an important issue. Inappropriate porch furniture is one thing to ignore, but an ordinance aimed at enhancing the central workings of government can't be enacted then ignored, without breeding cynicism. While I am grateful these citizens took up the challenge to make government better by joining the commission, I, rightly or wrongly, didn't want to start another exercise in futility, so I stepped back.

And yet, futility or otherwise, Ordinance G-12-17 (passed 8-16-2012) remains on the books. After yesterday's fact-gathering, we at least have names and contact information.

If the Ethics Commission still exists, shouldn't it be easier for citizens to use it? It really shouldn't matter whether it's Spring Break week or the middle of August.

Friday, March 20, 2015

So, how does one file a complaint with the Ethics Commission ...


... when there's no mention of the Ethics Commission on the city's own web site (it was established in 2012).

There's down low, and then there's DOWN LOW.

---

§ 33.141  COMPLAINT PROCESS, FILING AND REVIEW BY SECRETARY.
   (A)   Any individual may file a complaint.  The complaint shall be affirmed in writing and signed by the complainant.  The complaint shall state the nature of the alleged violation, the date, time and place of each occurrence, and name of the individual charged with the violation, referred to as the respondent.
   (B)   Complaints shall be filed with the secretary, who shall promptly provide a copy to any persons against whom a violation is alleged.
   (C)   Within 30 days after receipt of a complaint, the secretary shall conduct a preliminary investigation.  The secretary may request that the Ethics Commission extend the time for the completion of the preliminary investigation.  If the Ethics Commission determines that extension is necessary or desirable and would not be prejudicial to the person against whom a violation is alleged, the Ethics Commission shall grant the extension. If the Ethics Commission determines that the preliminary investigation must be completed in less than 30 days in order to avoid prejudice or irreparable harm to the person against whom a violation is alleged, the Ethics Commission shall order the secretary to complete the preliminary investigation in a shorter period of time, and the secretary shall comply.
   (D)   If the secretary determines that the complaint alleges violations of criminal acts, the secretary shall promptly refer the complaint to an appropriate law enforcement agency and the matter may be stayed pending direction from the law enforcement agency.
   (E)   If the secretary determines, after preliminary investigation, that there are no reasonable grounds to believe that a violation has occurred, the secretary shall dismiss the complaint.  If the secretary dismisses the complaint, he or she shall do so in writing, setting forth the facts and the provisions of law upon which the dismissal is based, and provide copies of the written dismissal to the complainant, to the individual charged with the violation, and to the members of the Ethics Commission.  The complainant shall have the right to appeal the decision of the secretary.
   (F)   The secretary shall refer the complaint to the Ethics Commission if, after a preliminary investigation, the secretary does not:
      (1)   Ask for additional time to conduct a more extensive investigation pursuant to division (C);
      (2)   Refer the matter to law enforcement pursuant to division (D); or
      (3)   Dismiss the complaint pursuant to division (E).
(Ord. G-12-17, passed 8-16-2012)

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Human Rights Commission somehow gnaws through the leash and will hold an open house this Friday.


(Full disclosure: The missus is a member of the Human Rights Commission)

After a daring escape from a dusty shelf in the rear of the city's "be seen but not heard" garage, alongside the bin where economic development plans are stored, the Human Rights Commission is having an open house on Friday afternoon at the Carnegie Center (3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.).

As I wrote earlier this year:

No one's happier than me to see a freshly enabled HRC. This blog was advocating such a revival during the Garner administration. But I must admit it seems strange to have such a nice, shiny new car and keep it parked in the garage. For something that's been here for more than a year, there's already an aura of disuse. It seems almost as though the HRC was reconstituted for no other reason than to serve as laudatory sidebar on a metaphorical website.

The open house aims to introduce the HRC to the public, and familiarize residents with the mechanism for filing complaints.

We've already located on potential area of inquiry: Walkability as a civil rights issue.

It's unfortunate that the HRC has been corralled by city government's incremental, institutionalized, decades-long timidity, but perhaps this will change.

The HRC isn't the only example of "not to be touched" at the current time: After all, there's also this: Mike Ladd: 17 months to receive 2 weeks pay, and other shovel-ready Ethics Commission topics.

Thursday, October 03, 2013

Mike Ladd: 17 months to receive 2 weeks pay, and other shovel-ready Ethics Commission topics.

Where to begin?

Michael C. Ladd, former  executive director of the New Albany Urban Enterprise Association, has written a letter to the News and Tribune documenting the "payment due" shambles following in the wake of his March, 2012 dismissal. The gist of all this is simple to the point of eloquence:

Why have an Ethics Commission if not to consider such matters?

Of course, eloquence seldom plays well in a town that doesn't read. For those who do, there is ample background for this story right here at NAC. The words are mine, except Nick Cortolillo's.

Rare sighting of the city's Ethics Commission returns focus to Ladd's UEA 2012 "norwooding" ... "Let me phrase it this way: If you lost your job owing to allegations of malfeasance, and there was an opportunity to set the record straight, wouldn't you prefer future employers to view your past record as it was, not as unsubstantiated insinuations have continued to depict it?"

Ethics Commission receives shovel-ready complaint ... "Make no mistake: I'll go to my grave denouncing the third England administration's grubby treatment of Mike Ladd, borne of its desire to grab whatever money it could, while there still remained non-transparent time to do so and a handy nearby ATM. It sickened me then, it sickens me now, and I'm prepared to debate any one, any time, who argues otherwise."

Nick Cortolillo on "politically motivated interference" with the UEA ... "The city of New Albany wanted unlimited access to the enterprise association’s revenue and Ladd was in the way."

UEA decapitation: Different tactics, same desired outcome, and still just as wrong as before ... "How can history’s lessons be understood and heeded, and its mistakes avoided, by collective amnesia? Mr. Duggins has assured me that in this brave new UEA world, the coercive errors of the England years will never be repeated, and I believe he’s being sincere. And yet, without publicly discussing what the errors actually were, do we even know what we’re referring to?"

ON THE AVENUES: A decapitation, coming tomorrow ... "I do not agree that pre-determined outcomes are truly representative of what consultative, democratic government should be."

Ladd's letter follows. I've chosen to publish the original version, not the edited version which appears in the newspaper.

Former UEZ director: checks were long overdue

Editor’s note: Michael Ladd, former executive director of the Urban Enterprise Zone Association, is referring to a story published by the News and Tribune that ran in the Aug. 31, 2013, edition titled “New Albany: A highly ethical city?” He is referring to David Duggins, director of economic development and redevelopment for New Albany.

To the Editor:

"Duggins said the UEZ attempted to mail two checks to cover the $1,875 for two weeks of pay they believe he was due, but they were returned and not cashed.

We do feel like he was entitled to the remaining two weeks of his contract."

It took 17 months for the UEZ to send the above referenced two checks and then only after the Indiana Department of Labor (IDOL) suggested I sue the NAUEA after three attempts to contact Duggins and the UEZ failed to elicit any response at all. Also, there have been at least five attempts by local attornies to contact Duggins specifically and the UEA through its board president and other officers about the same matter over the same seventeen month period. It was only after the IDOL recommended I sue that the UEA (through the civil city attorney) responded. The email is dated July 17 and reads . . .

Dear Michael Ladd:

The Indiana Department of Labor has been investigating the above-referenced wage claim. We made several attempts to contact New Albany Urban Enterprise Association, but received no response. As there was no information provided by New Albany Urban Enterprise Association, we have made the following determination:

Indiana wage & hour law generally requires an employer to pay an employee who has separated from employment all wages due at the next regularly-scheduled payday. (See Indiana Code 22-2-5-1(b)).

Since New Albany Urban Enterprise Association failed to respond to this claim, the Department of Labor is unable to determine whether the wages claimed are actually owed. If this determination is believed to be in error, Michael Ladd may wish to consult with private legal counsel. As a courtesy, we have provided Michael Ladd with a list of attorneys in Indiana who have acknowledged that they will assist with Wage Claims.

If you have any questions or concerns about this determination, please contact us via e-mail at wageclaims@dol.in.gov or by phone at (317) 232-2655 option 1.

Sincerely,

Wage and Hour Division

Following this recommendation, on August 1, 2013, I found in my mailbox a letter signed "Shane L. Gibson Corporate Counsel". In it were a cover letter and two checks from the UEA. The checks were dated March 15, 2012. I had written them myself. Seventeen months old, eleven months out of date. Checks have a shelf-life of six months. Therefore, the checks were uncashable. Of course I returned them. They were no good. Five days later I received newly issued, cashable, checks.

"We do feel like he was entitled to the remaining two weeks of his contract." But only after seventeen months of stalling, numerous efforts by attorneys to contact them, and after attempting to pawn off two checks that were no good. Duggins is good at parsing his words and uttering sentences that leave a reader or listener with a mis-impression of actual circumstances. It is only after looking behind the curtain that you learn the truth.

There is only one point on which I can say I agree with Duggins: I too would be "happy to discuss" these issues with the Ethics Commission. If they ever get created and actually meet.

Michael C. Ladd

Tuesday, September 03, 2013

Perhaps it's just me, but "Reactive By Design" isn't really the civic slogan I had in mind.


Full disclosure: Diana is a member of the Human Rights Commission.

I'm fairly confident that I agree with my neighbor and 3rd district council representative Greg Phipps on many, and perhaps most, major points of city politics. Given that, I'll now publicly differ, just a bit, and politely, in the sense of suggesting that Greg's observation ...

“There’s different points of view on that, but I think we set the commission up to be more reactive than proactive."

... prompts one of my own: Why are we so resigned to accepting yet another "reactive" institution in a town chock full of them?

New Albany: A highly ethical city? Ethics, human rights commissions still haven’t heard a case, by Daniel Suddeath (News and Tribune)

NEW ALBANY — The New Albany Human Rights and Ethics Commissions were established by the city more than a year ago, but to date, neither have heard cases.

Some see that as a positive reflection of New Albany, while others believe the boards should be more involved in the process of selecting what they review.

“It seems like the human rights commission has been kind of pushed to the back burner a little bit,” commission member Brad Bell said.

The board — which was established in July of 2012 — hasn’t heard a case, which is somewhat suspicious, he continued.

“We’d love to think it’s because the community is so diverse and open is the reason we don’t have any [complaints], but I think we all know a little better than that,” Bell said ...

But there's even more from Toll-Free New Albany.

Operators are standing by; call now and get TWO reactive institutions for the price of one.

 ... As for the Ethics Commission — which differs from the human rights commission because it only considers cases regarding public officials — the timing of the formation of the body appears to be keeping it from hearing one complaint that has been made public.

Local businessman and resident Randy Smith filed a complaint with the ethics commission against David Duggins, director of economic development and redevelopment for the city, over the firing of former New Albany Urban Enterprise Executive Director Mike Ladd.

Smith alleged that several actions made by Duggins during the process were unethical including accusing Ladd of paying claims without board approval.

However, since the alleged actions took place in March of 2012, about five months before the body was established, the ethics commission is likely not to review the case.

I'm an atheist by trade, but God, I'm tired of incremental, institutionalized timidity.

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Rare sighting of the city's Ethics Commission returns focus to Ladd's UEA 2012 "norwooding."


The Gahan administration has a mint condition Ethics Commission, and according to the newspaper's Suddeath, perhaps they're willing to let it be taken it out for a spin.

New Albany Ethics Commission may not have to review past cases

NEW ALBANY — The members of the New Albany Ethics Commission have been chosen, and the group has held two organizational meetings, however, the body may not hear complaints filed over matters that occurred prior to its establishment.

A complaint against a high-ranking administration official wouldn’t be heard if the commission doesn’t review past cases, however, Mayor Jeff Gahan said this week the body should still review the matter as he added he’s confident the body would find “everything in order.”


Specifically, there's the matter of the Bookseller's complaint over the handling of Mike Ladd's ouster from the Urban Enterprise Association.

Local businessman Randy Smith submitted a complaint for the commission to review that cited several alleged violations by David Duggins, economic development and redevelopment director for the city, in his involvement in the firing of former New Albany Urban Enterprise Zone Association Executive Director Mike Ladd.

Why does this "old" news still matter?

Let me phrase it this way: If you lost your job owing to allegations of malfeasance, and there was an opportunity to set the record straight, wouldn't you prefer future employers to view your past record as it was, not as unsubstantiated insinuations have continued to depict it?

Meanwhile, persistent rumor has it that New Albany has a brand new Human Rights Commission parked somewhere out of mind and sight. Perhaps the HRC also will be declared street legal soon, as opposed to something we can feel good about on the city website, but never actually drive.

We have all been here before ...

Ethics Commission receives shovel-ready complaint.


UEA decapitation: Different tactics, same desired outcome, and still just as wrong as before.

ON THE AVENUES: A decapitation, coming tomorrow.


Monday, January 07, 2013

Inaugural council gathering to feature hootchy-kootchy, tootsie wootsie and an election.


As Matt Nash hinted in last Friday’s column, the News and ‘Bune is reporting that 4th district council person Pat McLaughlin is a candidate for the city council presidency. The year’s first meeting is tonight, and that’s when they’ll vote. If I finish reading the phone book, I may even attend.

The incumbent majordomo is Diane Benedetti. As usual, she did not return the newspaper’s call.

As usual, it can be expected that Dan Coffey will interject himself in the role of kingmaker.

As usual, Shirley Baird will continue to refrain from blogging, and as usual, lone Republican Kevin Zurschmiede will receive his instructions from One Southern Indiana via messages inserted into pumpkins, as written on Horseshoe Foundation stationary.

On Silver Hills, a lonely dog will bark – at least until Bob Caesar, as usual, proposes spending another million or two to remove the mutt’s vocal cords, remove the kennel to Rent Boy Park, or hire more lawyers to prevent the Reisz building from being rehabbed.

Your task as reader is to determine which of the preceding “Democrats” have any remote connection to the Democratic Party as commonly known in the remainder of the nation. Good luck with that; you’ll need a magnifying glass, and probably quite a lot of whiskey. Indeed, there are some things that beer just cannot do.

---

In the same article, mention is made of the newly enabled Ethics Commission, for which five top secret appointments have been made, although there is no mention of who the lucky winners are. The commission first will meet and organize itself, and then it can hear the first big case, a dusty and long-awaited complaint filed by downtown businessman Randy Smith pertaining to the administration’s cashiering of Mike Ladd from the Urban Enterprise Association one year ago.

Turns out Robert Lamm (Chicago) was mistaken. In New Albany, time passes much too slowly, when we’re together laughing. Join me at the council conclave, and don't forget your admission ticket:


Thursday, October 04, 2012

Ethics Commission receives shovel-ready complaint.

This story isn't about me, but there is a tangential connection. I didn't have any prior knowledge of the ethics complaint. The reporter asked good questions, and I answered them truthfully.

Make no mistake: I'll go to my grave denouncing the third England administration's grubby treatment of Mike Ladd, borne of its desire to grab whatever money it could, while there still remained non-transparent time to do so and a handy nearby ATM. It sickened me then, it sickens me now, and I'm prepared to debate any one, any time, who argues otherwise.

That said, I'm no longer on the UEA board, the current administration made a decision (whether or not I approve it), and I made my peace with it earlier this year. I suppose we'll all be watching to see how this complaint unfolds, both as a case on its own merits, and as an indication of how the ethics commission will function.

UEA decapitation: Different tactics, same desired outcome, and still just as wrong as before.

ON THE AVENUES: A decapitation, coming tomorrow.

New Albany ethics commission may receive complaint regarding UEZ firing; Duggins accused of defamatory statements against Ladd, by Daniel Suddeath (News and Tribune)

NEW ALBANY — The city’s ethics commission has yet to convene, but a complaint has already been prepared for the body’s review in regards to the firing of Mike Ladd, former executive director of the New Albany Urban Enterprise Zone Association.

Tuesday, August 07, 2012

Congratulations to Brad Bell, new appointee to New Albany's Human Rights Commission.

(Late addition: According to Brad, the second appointment also was made last night: Wendy Stepro)

After New Albany's city council approved a Right To Be Tolled resolution ... wait, scratch that.

After New Albany's city council approved a Human Rights Commission ordinance, Mayor Jeff Gahan immediately made his two statutory appointments: Tonye Rutherford and Cliff Staten. Subsequently, in the grand tradition of camels passing through the eyes of needles, the council's own two appointments were to be shepherded by the body's president, which nevertheless produced at least one fine choice announced at last evening's meeting, as revealed by Brad Bell on Facebook:

A few weeks ago the New Albany City Council passed an ordinance creating a Human Rights Commission. Tonight the City Council made it official and appointed me to be one of the 5 members of this commission. I am beyond proud and humbled and look forward to fighting for what's right in New Albany!! It is my opinion that this commission is one of if not the most important as it will matters pertaining to; race, religion, color, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, gender ID, military service and disability. I am beyond excited about this appointment!

I am delighted for my fellow former at-large council candidate's appointment to a seat on the commission.

Meanwhile, at last night's council meeting, the notion of an Ethics Commission was supported in spite of Professor Erika's misspelled screeching against it.

Ethics commission approved

Without much discussion, the council unanimously approved the establishment of an ethics commission on first and second readings.

Councilman John Gonder’s proposal will require one more ballot, likely to be taken later this month, before the commission is official. If approved, the commission will hear complaints and investigate charges of unethical procedures by public officials and employees as they pertain to hiring processes, government contracts and other municipal actions.

The ethics commission is set to consist of five members, none of which will be elected officials.

Monday, August 06, 2012

It's time for the city council to vote on an ethics commission.

As of this morning, the agenda for tonight's meeting has yet to appear in its usual web site niche, where it is filed under the city clerk, not the city council itself.

Only a few short years ago, when the council was populated (and the city stifled) by the Gang of Four, an ethics motion would have been surreal, at best. One imagines King Larry in his polling place of a garage, thinking back to the good ol' vote rigging days, and feeling the hairs in his ears quiver ... although on second thought, that's the sensation that grips him when well-endowed male cyclists cruise past the house.

The newspaper provides further background here.

Gonder’s ethics commission proposal comes to New Albany council; Area agencies would designate members of the body, by Daniel Suddeath (News and Tribune)

NEW ALBANY — After months of preparation, New Albany City Councilman John Gonder will bring his proposal to the table for the establishment of an inaugural ethics commission for a vote Monday night.

If approved, the ethics commission would differ from the human rights commission founded last month by the council in that it would focus only on government affairs such as contracts and public employee and official practices.

The ordinance — which is set for two ballots Monday but will require three readings before passage — was initially slated to be voted on last month but was tabled.

Along with tightening some of the language in the measure, the ordinance has also changed in terms of who will serve on the board.

The executive director of Rauch Industries, the president of the Floyd County Bar Association, the New Albany postmaster and the executive director of Hope Southern Indiana will still designate four of the members of the body.

But Gonder changed the measure so that the president of the local NAACP chapter can appoint the fifth member of the commission. Initially, the first four appointees were to select the fifth member.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Newspaper says: "Gonder proposing ethics commission."

I tend to agree with John Gonder, and in the instance of his proposal for an Ethics Commission, I can't say that I disagree. However ...

(1) Can someone/anyone, either council or City Hall, clarify the status of the existing but shamefully moribund Human Rights Commission concurrent with this new proposal?

(2) Postmaster? Don't we have a dot.com somewhere in town?

(3) Wouldn't it be rich if the freshly convened ethics panel chooses Professor Erik from Freedom to Screech? Then Ms. Denhart would have to go out and hire someone to play him, or else just cross-dress like before.

Regrettably, I must skip tonight's council gathering, as there is a pre-existing date with a marketing class at IU Southeast.

Gonder proposing ethics commission, by Daniel Suddeath

NEW ALBANY — New Albany City Councilman John Gonder said the ordinance he will introduce tonight calling for the establishment of an Ethics Commission is intended to help alleviate any doubts residents may have about their local elected officials.

Gonder is slated to introduce for first and second readings the measure which, if approved, would establish a five-member ethics panel.

If convened, the ethics commission would be charged with formulating a code of ethics within three months of its first meeting. The code of ethics would then be brought before the city council for consideration and possible approval.

The ethics commission would also hear complaints against any city employee, council or board member to determine if that code was broken. No public official would be allowed to serve on the commission as the measure is written.

Instead, four people holding prominent positions in the city would be allowed to each appoint one person. The president of the Floyd County Bar Association, the New Albany Postmaster, the principal of New Albany High School and the chancellor of Indiana University Southeast would each be given one selection.

The fifth member of the commission would then be chosen by the four appointments.