Showing posts with label skullduggery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label skullduggery. Show all posts

Thursday, October 03, 2013

Mike Ladd: 17 months to receive 2 weeks pay, and other shovel-ready Ethics Commission topics.

Where to begin?

Michael C. Ladd, former  executive director of the New Albany Urban Enterprise Association, has written a letter to the News and Tribune documenting the "payment due" shambles following in the wake of his March, 2012 dismissal. The gist of all this is simple to the point of eloquence:

Why have an Ethics Commission if not to consider such matters?

Of course, eloquence seldom plays well in a town that doesn't read. For those who do, there is ample background for this story right here at NAC. The words are mine, except Nick Cortolillo's.

Rare sighting of the city's Ethics Commission returns focus to Ladd's UEA 2012 "norwooding" ... "Let me phrase it this way: If you lost your job owing to allegations of malfeasance, and there was an opportunity to set the record straight, wouldn't you prefer future employers to view your past record as it was, not as unsubstantiated insinuations have continued to depict it?"

Ethics Commission receives shovel-ready complaint ... "Make no mistake: I'll go to my grave denouncing the third England administration's grubby treatment of Mike Ladd, borne of its desire to grab whatever money it could, while there still remained non-transparent time to do so and a handy nearby ATM. It sickened me then, it sickens me now, and I'm prepared to debate any one, any time, who argues otherwise."

Nick Cortolillo on "politically motivated interference" with the UEA ... "The city of New Albany wanted unlimited access to the enterprise association’s revenue and Ladd was in the way."

UEA decapitation: Different tactics, same desired outcome, and still just as wrong as before ... "How can history’s lessons be understood and heeded, and its mistakes avoided, by collective amnesia? Mr. Duggins has assured me that in this brave new UEA world, the coercive errors of the England years will never be repeated, and I believe he’s being sincere. And yet, without publicly discussing what the errors actually were, do we even know what we’re referring to?"

ON THE AVENUES: A decapitation, coming tomorrow ... "I do not agree that pre-determined outcomes are truly representative of what consultative, democratic government should be."

Ladd's letter follows. I've chosen to publish the original version, not the edited version which appears in the newspaper.

Former UEZ director: checks were long overdue

Editor’s note: Michael Ladd, former executive director of the Urban Enterprise Zone Association, is referring to a story published by the News and Tribune that ran in the Aug. 31, 2013, edition titled “New Albany: A highly ethical city?” He is referring to David Duggins, director of economic development and redevelopment for New Albany.

To the Editor:

"Duggins said the UEZ attempted to mail two checks to cover the $1,875 for two weeks of pay they believe he was due, but they were returned and not cashed.

We do feel like he was entitled to the remaining two weeks of his contract."

It took 17 months for the UEZ to send the above referenced two checks and then only after the Indiana Department of Labor (IDOL) suggested I sue the NAUEA after three attempts to contact Duggins and the UEZ failed to elicit any response at all. Also, there have been at least five attempts by local attornies to contact Duggins specifically and the UEA through its board president and other officers about the same matter over the same seventeen month period. It was only after the IDOL recommended I sue that the UEA (through the civil city attorney) responded. The email is dated July 17 and reads . . .

Dear Michael Ladd:

The Indiana Department of Labor has been investigating the above-referenced wage claim. We made several attempts to contact New Albany Urban Enterprise Association, but received no response. As there was no information provided by New Albany Urban Enterprise Association, we have made the following determination:

Indiana wage & hour law generally requires an employer to pay an employee who has separated from employment all wages due at the next regularly-scheduled payday. (See Indiana Code 22-2-5-1(b)).

Since New Albany Urban Enterprise Association failed to respond to this claim, the Department of Labor is unable to determine whether the wages claimed are actually owed. If this determination is believed to be in error, Michael Ladd may wish to consult with private legal counsel. As a courtesy, we have provided Michael Ladd with a list of attorneys in Indiana who have acknowledged that they will assist with Wage Claims.

If you have any questions or concerns about this determination, please contact us via e-mail at wageclaims@dol.in.gov or by phone at (317) 232-2655 option 1.

Sincerely,

Wage and Hour Division

Following this recommendation, on August 1, 2013, I found in my mailbox a letter signed "Shane L. Gibson Corporate Counsel". In it were a cover letter and two checks from the UEA. The checks were dated March 15, 2012. I had written them myself. Seventeen months old, eleven months out of date. Checks have a shelf-life of six months. Therefore, the checks were uncashable. Of course I returned them. They were no good. Five days later I received newly issued, cashable, checks.

"We do feel like he was entitled to the remaining two weeks of his contract." But only after seventeen months of stalling, numerous efforts by attorneys to contact them, and after attempting to pawn off two checks that were no good. Duggins is good at parsing his words and uttering sentences that leave a reader or listener with a mis-impression of actual circumstances. It is only after looking behind the curtain that you learn the truth.

There is only one point on which I can say I agree with Duggins: I too would be "happy to discuss" these issues with the Ethics Commission. If they ever get created and actually meet.

Michael C. Ladd

Sunday, March 03, 2013

If Darin Coddington is without the "skill set," then what about the voters who chose him to be auditor?

The C-J's Grace Schneider outlines the departing Darin Coddington's predicament as scapegoat for the county's budget crisis, as nary a Republican can be found who'll publicly go to bat for Coddington.

Perhaps this scurrying might be taken as a sign of emerging political maturity, except for the fact that ever since Coddington took office, word on both left and right sides of the street has been that his glaring absence of applicable experience meant that he barely knew what he was doing.

Of course, the seeming tumult in Dave Matthews's GOP ranks might be diversionary, too. Is Coddington's convenient springtime abdication also the metaphorical washing of hands by commissioners Bush and Seabrook, v.v. the auditor's willingness to pay Keith Henderson's legal fees without examination?

It's a legitimate question, right?

Floyd County auditor resigns amid budget crisis

Floyd County Auditor Darin Coddington resigned Friday, effective May 3, after county leaders acknowledged that a series of missteps during the past year have led to a major budget emergency.

Coddington, a Republican who was elected in 2010, had told fellow county leaders that he was resigning for personal reasons. An after-hours number for him could not be found Friday.

John Schellenberger, a Republican and current chairman of the Floyd County Council, acknowledged in an interview that the financial crisis — an estimated $2.4 million budget deficit discovered about eight weeks into the new year — was a factor.

“If a person doesn’t have the skill set, it’s a really stressful job” serving as auditor, Schellenberger said.