Note the header, and the complete absence of a connection between it and the muddled thinking of the writer. What if I titled this post, "Another satisfied reader of NA Health?"
Three cheers to Mr. Dave MatthewsEr, if it's slander as such, then it's illegal, as opposed to legal, right?
I thought of writing several times, but couldn’t come up with enough 12- to 15-letter words that would meet Mr. Columnist’s standards. Yes, he has his rights via the First Amendment, but to me the garbage he writes is legal slander. I can’t believe the paper continues to let him use them. They should tell him to shape up or ship out.
If he finds New Albany and its people such a bad and corrupt place to live, he should pack his bags and be on the next plane to a place that acts and thinks as he does.
P.S. As I believe there is some good in everyone, his article on his trip to Germany was readable.
--Patricia Elliott, Sellersburg
Moreover, isn’t it amazing how often we hear Americans thundering about the Constitution when it comes to saving a few bucks in taxes to buy more plastic Chinese trinkets at Wal-Mart, but when the notion of free speech comes into play, speedily tossing the holy founding document aside like so much used toilet paper?
2 comments:
It's not surprising...last week, Shirley Baird wrote a letter critical of one written by a Mrs. Schad. The Trib headline? "Baird gives thumbs up to Schad letter" although nothing could be further from the truth. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
Post a Comment