Monday, July 24, 2006

So much for the so-called “Coffey Plan.”

Readers will recall that the obstructionist 1st district councilman once proposed to completely disengage the city of New Albany from the Scribner Place redevelopment project, entrusting it instead to the YMCA – an entity whose previous record of organizational competence rendered it far more trustworthy in his eyes than those governmental mechanisms of which CM Coffey is intimately part and parcel, but which he congenitally mistrusts and generally finds useful in daily life only as a starting point for flagrant demagoguery.

Consequently, and to put it mildly, it is highly ironic that with New Albany, Floyd County and the Caesar’s Foundation all having made the Scribner Place race in reasonably good condition, it is the previously unimpeachable YMCA itself that now huffs, wheezes and puffs with the finishing line in sight.

Or, is it?

The truth is, none of us really know.

The story broke in the Courier-Journal on Saturday, and was reported by the Tribune on Sunday morning. The two local mainstream media accounts are in general agreement as to the central point: The Y’s eleventh-hour financial snags could result in the project's rebidding, with potentially higher costs, with the unfortunate possibility that all of the intricate and hard-fought financial arrangements in the public sphere might be subject to further vicious rounds of reconsideration – not to mention recrimination, a house specialty of the area's Brambleberry end-time sect.

And so ...

Scribner Place schedule in jeopardy; With YMCA still lacking immediate funding, new construction bids could be required at higher cost, by Eric Scott Campbell (News-Tribune):

New Albany’s Scribner Place could become smaller, costlier or both.

... with the Gang of Four News Agency (GFNA) sponsoring this:

Scribner Place hits financing snag; Project might have to be rebid, by Ben Zion Hershberg (short shelf life for Courier-Journal links):

Plans for the Scribner Place development in downtown New Albany suffered a potentially serious financial setback yesterday.

Readers are invited to compare and contrast the tone of the two reports. I detect the usual C-J shading toward the sensationalistic, and find the Tribune account more measured, owing perhaps to an extra day’s time to investigate. As an example, Tribune reporter Campbell notes:

Mayor James Garner said all parties plan to meet Monday and see if the finances could come through ahead of schedule. If not, Garner said, the bidders could be asked to voluntarily extend the length of their bids.

This option is not referenced by the C-J’s Hershberg, who instead assesses at-large councilman Jack Messer’s reaction:

Jack Messer, a member of the New Albany City Council, described the problem as "a major, major setback."

If the complex is delayed and must be rebid, Messer said, costs could go up substantially.

He said "it could open the door" to members of the public and council who oppose the $20 million development.


When this latest in a series of melodramatic crises is surmounted, construction actually begins, and the Scribner Place project finally is completed in two years’ time, it will have taken about as long for it to pass from conception to realization as did the Sherman Minton Bridge, and it is likely to have aroused more passions along the way, at least among the minority in the community willing to venture an opinion on the topic -- which is pathetically small, indeed.

Unfortunately –- but not unexpectedly –- much of the discussion recently generated by Scribner Place within the local blogosphere has embraced largely unrelated political and personal aspects of city life rather than pertaining to the merits of the project itself and its position in the context of significant attendant issues such as urban redevelopment and downtown revitalization.

As the current story unfolds over the next few working days, all New Albanians with an interest in the city’s progress will be watching, as well as some for whom regress is the chosen antidote to achievement.

Now, as before, NA Confidential numbers itself among the former. We'll report back later in the week.

See also: Culpable? or We Hardly Knew Ye at NA Confidential, and YMCA,YOU LET NEW ALBANY DOWN at New Albany Today.

Photo credit: Christian Science Monitor.

5 comments:

Jeff Gillenwater said...

Now would be an excellent time for One Southern Indiana to prove its mettle by stepping in to help. Given the number of bankers and business leaders involved, surely some positive influence could be exerted.

As a new organization (and one that's keeping an eye on obstructionists in New Albany and elsewhere), this would seem an opportunity to build credibility by offering clear support for the Scribner project and New Albany revitalization in general in a way the previous Chamber never did.

East Ender said...

I must agree with indiana democrat on the assertions that perhaps a re-bidding process could actually lower the cost of the project, and term limits for Council Members could solve a lot of problems.
More importantly, term limits would allow for many other citizens to have the opportunity to serve their community.
Ceece -
I grew up in Clarksville, and it is a prime example of uncontrolled growth. The condition it is in now is what happens when the weight of the dollar outweighs the weight of one's consciousness.

All4Word said...

Amen, knighttrain.

East Ender said...

knighttrain -
So are we to think that the term limits on the mayoral office cause the problems you mention?
What effects would you anticipate from limits on consecutive terms?
In other words, nobody could serve more than 2 terms, back to back.
Might this be a compromise that could satisfy everyone's concerns?

The New Albanian said...

I'm with Knighttrain on this one.