Monday, July 03, 2006

He wears a “K” on his chest, but it doesn’t mean “strikeout.”

It’s a holiday, folks. 230 years ago courageous men took a stand on principle to create this country. They birthed it, but we’re still fighting to keep it alive.

Monday night, long-serving 4th District Council Member Larry Kochert took a courageous stand, but not before an angst-riddled interval. While the attempted murderers of Scribner Place repeatedly called out advice vestigial and parliamentary, Mr. Kochert was in obvious agony.

He could have taken the weasel’s way out with the vote standing at 4 nays, 3 ayes to kill the project. A weasel would have voted aye, establishing a tie vote and thereby defeating the resolution. And Larry could have done that while claiming he was both for and against the Scribner Place/YMCA/Harrah’s Foundation Natatorium redevelopment project.
So whether he voted aye or nay, the matter was settled. Scribner Place is a go for launch. But it was still dramatic.

Shaking in frustration and silently praying that the final bill for the city comes in at $137,500 per annum, Kochert stretched out the voting for what seemed like five full, silent minutes.
For the record: Voting to kill Scribner Place were CM’s Coffey (District 1), Schmidt (District 2), and Price (District 3). All other members in attendance voted against any notion of killing the project and creating a lasting stain on the name of New Albany.

******

During the “Communications from the Public” portion of the evening, one woman argued forcefully that council resolutions are “council” business and that the public and the press have no right to know what’s in the members packets, even though it is a public record. Mystical knowledge passed down through the generations seemingly informed her complaint, but the fact that NA Confidential got the scoop on the Schmidt resolution did nothing but give the public MORE information, not less. That’s called journalism, in case you were wondering.

*****

Speaking of journalism, Ben Zion Hershberg, part-time reporter for The Courier-Journal (GFNA is his real gig) must have been squirming as council member after council member referred to the outstanding reporting being done by our hometown newspaper over the past several weeks. If I heard “It says in The Tribune” once, I heard it a dozen times.

*****

Of course, not all communications from the public are created equal as those in attendance will attest. As this reporter was ejected from a recent meeting for seeking to rectify a slander, and this after being muzzled by the presiding officer for no reason other than that he didn’t care for how I was saying it, I’m particularly sensitive to the favoritism shown to certain individuals who are allowed to “communicate” with council at their discretion. I’ll be discussing this with Indiana’s Public Access Counselor shortly. Even Larry Kochert thinks I should do so.

*****

The other atrocity on the agenda was the “Terminate Shane Gibson” ordinance, put forward by none other than that champion of the community forum, and friend Brandon’s idea of a man you can work with, Dan Coffey. Short report? The ordinance was basically ridiculed by the president and a majority of the council as being inappropriate, inopportune, and poorly thought-out. Going 0-for-2 for the evening didn’t seem to throw Coffey off his stride, though. He stuck to his playbook despite its proven loserdom. Isn’t that the definition of something???

*****

CM Price must have had a birthday recently, and the wards for whom he serves as pater familias went all out and got him the ever-useful Word A Day Toilet Paper. Tonight’s word? “Argumentative,” which Price whipped out of his holster to flog Jack Messer with. And then Steve sat back triumphantly with a giant beef-stick-eating grin as if he’d invented the word. “You’re just being argumentative.”

*****

It truly was Café Nebulosa on the third floor Monday night. Firing wide, Mr. Coffey questioned city planning and redevelopment officer John Rosenbarger as to whether the YMCA would be able to participate in the “Capital Investment Campaign Fund.” You know, that thingee Dan read about just this month in The Tribune. Rosenbarger was at a loss, since the “CICF” is, in fact, exclusively the fundraising campaign for the Y and has nothing whatsoever to do with the city.

*****

It’s not all kudos this day for Mr. Kochert. He’s either disingenuous or losing memory cells faster than anyone suspected. During the Scribner Murder debate, he claimed, in the immortal words of his 1st District colleague and co-conspirator, “this is the first I’ve heard of it,” referring to the city’s irrevocable commitment to devote as much as $400,000 a year to retire the Scribner Place bonds.

In fact, Kochert was the author of the amendment that put Scribner Place on track last fall, insisting that the $400,000 commitment be reduced by any amount proffered by Floyd County. That was enough to start the process that ends this month with the sale of the bonds, and next month with the groundbreaking

*****

Speaking of breaking new ground, Mayor Garner and the supporters of Scribner Place should plan to have about 1,000 shovels for that ceremony. Special seating (but no shovels) should be arranged for the opponents of the project, who will doubtless insist on claiming credit for its success. Think anyone will pay to have that ceremony taped and then scream conspiracy unless the school system’s educational channel broadcasts it?

*****

Kochert, who often fills out the card table at Gang of Four meetings, may have abdicated his seat to CM Donnie Blevins, but he still has his poodle to keep him company at Mickey D’s. But there may be more trouble in Gangland. Dan Coffey chose Monday night to bring up the crying need for a city impound lot. Lest we forget, marionette Stevie and his gal pals killed the city’s best option to not only replace the old lot but create a revenue stream. Why? NIMBY, of course.

*****

It’s simply amazing what lies get told at council. But what’s more appalling is that no one challenges them. Please, folks, if you haven’t attended a New Albany City Council meeting, you simply must make the time to do so.

*****

Here’s a modest proposal. Since under the law the default management of our unfunded federal stormwater mandate lies with the sewer utility, and since the sewer board abdicated that duty and forced the creation of a separate board to manage compliance and investment, council should allocate salaries to be equally divided between the two boards. I don’t really care how much they get paid so long as the stormwater board is paid in parity with the sewer board.

*****

Best unintentionally funny line of the evening goes to (drumroll, please)…Steve Price, who said “I’m in now way against moving New Albany forward.”

We’re going to have to retire that trophy, Steve. It looks like the other guys weren’t even trying. Love that Porter Waggoner thing you’ve got going on, too. But your companion’s Dolly Parton impression is the worst I’ve ever seen.

8 comments:

The New Albanian said...

Classic coverage.

All4Word said...

I'm sure our "anonymous" Greenville GOPster will take his time, but as he was in attendance, it will be interesting to see if he can make lemons out of lemonade.

Rick Carmickle said...

I truly believe, coffee should remain a morning beverage, not a city councilmember!

Hats of to Mr. Korcert, I think his heart grew 10 sizes last night, thanks to Dr Seuss for that one!

Note to Mr Coffee, while I used to consider you someone I could talk with in the past, when you dissed my dad a few weeks ago, well that was just the icing on the cake, you cry how this blog has been very unkind to you and even made derogatory comments about your mother, well as far as that goes, your cold heartless replies to a question my father asked of you last week now puts you in the same league!

I will work hard next year in your district to see that the rest of your constituents know just how heartless you have become! No more game playing, it’s on! I don’t care if I have to spend a $1,000.00 on ink, and go house to house handing out handbills, the West End needs to know, just how bad you want to keep it suppressed! You’re not for anything but yourself, see ya in the funny papers!

"Coffee belongs in a cup on the breakfast table, not on the city council!

Highwayman said...

Well done, A4W, well done!

jon faith said...

Sorry, I checked my pom-poms at the door. There is no onvious reason why one shouldn't advocate for an agenda that its considered progressive or otherwise well-suited for the place and times. That said, i find it rather egregious for mindless cheerleading from the peanut gallery and an escalated barrage of vitriol from the supposed "good side." This klatest wave has broached a majority of fronts, in sum inconceivable (but that isn't the point, is it?) as the obstructionist on the CC are either Idiots, Evil, or (now) Insane. This doesn't strike me as above board, yet it doesn't fail to elicit guffaws from our own smart(er) set. I feel like an unrefined Evelyn Waugh (what a contradiction) or rather how he (Waugh) gauged James Cain: a Proust in greasy overalls.

All4Word said...

Please feel free to expand on your comments, Jon. How egregious? One need not cheer, one need only be observant. One need not be credulous, only rational.

Your contributions are welcome, but less than nourishing without expansion.

The floor is yours.

jon faith said...

The suggestion that Mr Coffey is insane per your point of repetitious failure could extend to all sorts of philosophical, political and, yes, even, spiritual dimensions. This coupled with Jeff's assertions that the Gang of Four can be reduced (completely?) to entrenched stupidity, this leads where? IMHO it opens quite the can of worms. Trust me, I am not arguing against the efforts of most who adorn the progressive cloak in this fair town, yet one has to extend the same critical impulse to the wordworks of its own progenitors.

The desire for a grander nobility, a metanarrative, if you will, sweetens the effort of any activist. I think Mr Coffey may be reckless in his priorities but I can't quite register his presence as being tantamount McCarthy: couldn't an image of dead Jews have made the debate more resounding? The last offering was glib but concerns remain. Thanks, as always. - jon

All4Word said...

McCarthy's stage was larger and therefore he had an impact larger. You doubt, and I do not, that the tactics of Coffey suppress a significant number of city workers and divert the attention of both the executive and legislative branches from actual governance.

When the council itself must spend valuable time each meeting fighting Coffey's attempts to spin the record, when the council must respond to and correct untruths, and when the council must demand that meeting tapes be called up to demonstrate that Coffey's words are false, then the case is made.

Even in this past meeting, although it was until now unreported, Coffey objected to the minutes because they made him look bad. Never mind that they are accurate, he wants one last say about it and will not accept the option of merely adding his clarification, but demands the expungement of what he actually said.

Frankly, who cares what he said in conjunction with his ambush slide show. It was exposed by Tom Ford this past meeting as a bare-faced attempt to manufacture a drama, not to actually correct a problem.

It's hard to tell, Jon, whether you are saying that we simply care too much (or at least more than you do) or that we are playing fast and loose with our reporting and commentary.

Nonetheless, keep serving as ombudsman to keep us honest. But don't expect passivity in the face of corruption, obscurantism, and actual harm being committed against the people of New Albany.