Showing posts with label primaries and caucuses 2016. Show all posts
Showing posts with label primaries and caucuses 2016. Show all posts

Saturday, November 05, 2016

"One of the many things that makes Donald Trump angry is that Bernie Sanders does not seem to hold grudges."



It's a fast read, a good read, and a better excuse to repost these two photos of Bernie Sanders at The Exchange in May, 2016, when he WON the Indiana Democratic primary.

Come what may ... they can't take THAT away from me.

BERNIE SANDERS’S HARD FIGHT FOR HILLARY CLINTON, by Amy Davidson (The New Yorker)

... Since conceding defeat in the primaries, Sanders has been one of the real champions of this campaign. He let his supporters yell at him and deride him as a sellout in bleak delegate breakfasts at the Democratic National Convention, in Philadelphia, as he endorsed Clinton and explained why they needed to do the same. He made getting support for her his priority, putting aside any subtle, undermining gestures that might have better preserved his rebel-rock-star status. He has kept doing so despite other revelations in the Podesta e-mails, ones that are not about him personally but about issues that he believes in—for example, about money in politics, as exemplified by the Clinton team’s nurturing of donors. And he has earned the right to negotiate hard on such issues in the future.

Wednesday, June 08, 2016

"Clinton may take the nomination, but Sanders has won the debate."



May integrity and the strength of ideas continue to resonate.

Clinton may take the nomination, but Sanders has won the debate, by Katrina vanden Heuvel (Washington Post)

Clinton may take the nomination, but Sanders surely has won the political debate. He started at single digits in the polls and was widely dismissed as a “fringe” candidate. He has astounded even his supporters, winning more than 20 contests, 10 million votes and 1,500 pledged delegates, the most of any true insurgent in modern history. He has captured the support of young voters by record margins. And he did so less with personal charisma than with the power of his ideas and the force of the integrity demonstrated by spurning traditional deep-pocketed donors in favor of grass-roots fundraising. Harvard researchers found that Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 have actually become more progressive over the course of the campaign. Sanders hasn’t merely won a seat at the table, he’s started a sea change in Democratic politics that the party will have to adjust to.

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

"If this isn't the end for the Republican Party, it'll be a shame. They dominated American political life for 50 years and were never anything but monsters."

Chaplin, via Wikipedia. 

For the section below, alone.

R.I.P., GOP: How Trump Is Killing the Republican Party, by Matt Taibbi (Rolling Stone)

Donald Trump crushed 16 GOP opponents in one of the most appalling, vicious campaigns in history. His next victim? The entire Republican Party.

... In the weeks surrounding Cruz's cat-fart of a surrender in Indiana, party luminaries began the predictably Soviet process of coalescing around the once-despised new ruler. Trump endorsements of varying degrees of sincerity spilled in from the likes of Dick Cheney, Bob Dole, Mitch McConnell and even John McCain.

Having not recently suffered a revolution or a foreign-military occupation, Americans haven't seen this phenomenon much, but the effortless treason of top-tier Republicans once Trump locked up the nomination was the most predictable part of this story. Politicians, particularly this group, are like crackheads: You can get them to debase themselves completely for whatever's in your pocket, even if it's just lint.

That's why the first rule of any revolution is to wipe out the intellectuals. Trump is surely already dreaming of the vast logging camp he will fill with the Republican thinkfluencers who are at the moment making a show of being the last holdouts.

Wednesday, May 04, 2016

Nick Vaughn: "Money and Power: My Primary Election Synopsis."

Earlier this year, Nick Vaughn began writing guest columns ("Within City Limits") for NAC. For various reasons, he was unable to continue doing so, but let it be known that Nick always has a place to write here if he so desires. 

Following are his ruminations on yesterday's primary election. 

---

Money and Power: My Primary Election Synopsis

Well, Indiana has spoken, and with Indiana, Floyd County has spoken (well, at least 37.49% of Floyd County’s registered voters have spoken). The age old adage of “elections have consequences” has never felt so near to me before until after watching the results come in last night.

What we saw last night was a disturbing shift, that some will argue has been happening for awhile now, from substance and General Election electability to the unquivering and ultimately resounding strength of name ID and money.

When vague platitudes and millions of dollars can propel someone out of a primary instead of a proven record or substantive plans, something is truly wrong. When simple name ID propels you out of a primary at the local level instead of hard work and elbow grease, something is very wrong.

The real question is: why do we settle for this? Why is it that we allow ourselves to be butt of this big joke that is our current political system?

Call me crazy, but I believe that we should vote for the candidates who meet the following criteria: 1. Has substantive plans for how they will affect change in office, 2. Has the best chance of winning in the General Election, and 3. Works the hardest, knocks on the most doors, and meets the most people. Does this candidate win sometimes? Yes of course, a few of them won last night. A few.

The overwhelming majority of candidates who won last night, however, won because they had more money than everyone else and therefore the most name ID, or they were the product of the uninformed voter picking them at random because they had a good ballot spot or because they had seen their name before.

It is time for us to rethink the primary process. Don’t you think we ought to stop settling for what we deserve? Because I think it is. We need to stand up for ourselves and be informed voters. We also need to hold our candidates to a higher standard viz. what their plans are, why they are best fit for office, why they are best to beat the opposition in the General. These are the things that matter.

To reinstill integrity to the offices held by the people we elect, we must reevaluate the type of people we elect. We need to stand together and say vague platitudes won’t do anymore, just having a lot of money and a Super PAC won’t do anymore. Why should we be the victims when we have the ability to change who we vote to represent us?

Sunday, May 01, 2016

The blog's annual May Daze observance, and the joy of feeling the Bern.


This essay is reprinted or linked yearly, attesting to my eagerness to remind you that on May Day, as the Louisville area typically eschews work and instead focuses its partying proclivities on the ponies, most of the rest of the world takes a holiday amid thoughts about the nature of work.

For more vague linkages, see Hunter's Double D and Seattle Slew Kabobs, please.

In 2016, there was a providential twist: Bernie Sanders was running for president. At The New Yorker, Andy Borowitz immediately found the center of the target.

The Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders’s potential bid for the 2016 Presidency was declared over, on Monday, before it even began, because of a key feature of the American political system that makes a person with integrity ineligible for the White House. According to some experts, the electoral system has developed a number of safeguards over the past few decades to prevent someone with independence and backbone from occupying the Presidency.

As an independent senator and avowed socialist, the fact that Sanders exists in the American political non-spectrum is as good an introduction as any to the "real" international workers' holiday. Two weeks ago, we participated in early primary election voting at the county clerk's office, and I've never been as excited to cast a ballot for a presidential candidate as I was to opt for Sanders.

---

ON THE AVENUES BONUS: May Daze.

By the summer of 1987, when I first visited the geopolitical conglomeration formerly known as the Soviet Union, the country’s annual May Day parade in Moscow had long since ceased to be a showcase of international socialism.

Rather, it had reverted to the overt, and was staged as an ideological pageant of nationalistic fervor – a genuine, old-fashioned, patriotic flag-waver for Mother Russia.

For the bedrock Soviet worker, who according to prevailing mythology was the chief beneficiary of international socialism, May Day’s single biggest selling point was being able to avoid the drudgery of the factory for a few precious hours. He’d have rather been on the beach at a posh Black Sea resort in Bulgaria, but what could be done?

At least for a while he could forget about the dystopian Five Year Plan by hopping the subway from his cookie-cutter, high-rise suburb to the historic center of the city, queuing with fellow vodka-bearers, plodding behind the massive missiles through cobblestoned Red Square, and then finally passing the reviewing stand arranged atop Lenin’s Mausoleum for a fleeting glimpse of the jowly old men in furry caps, grimacing arthritically as they waved vacantly into space.

The parade was a choreographed set piece, of course, one fraught with symbolic properties, both for natives seeking clues to the direction of their country apart from the stultifying daily propaganda, and for observers elsewhere, like professional Kremlinologists in the employ of Western intelligence agencies.

These consulting spooks subsequently would examine film of the May Day parade, reshuffle their tea leaves, and strain them through a few hoary apocryphal algorithms. Passwords would be repeated, reports submitted, meetings held, and murmured decisions reached. In appropriately clandestine fashion, money would be exchanged, and a hush briefly might descend, until suddenly, somewhere in the world, a legally elected government was overthrown – first one of the Capitalist paymasters’ choosing, then another selected by the Communists, each in its own turn, serving the dual purpose of preserving the status quo, and stimulating both full erections and full employment among participating secret agents.

---

Long before the decade of the 1980’s, the workers of the world – be they in Akron, Cape Town or Tashkent – already understood that they neither had united, nor shed their chains in any fashion sufficient to exercise control over the means of production.

The stewards of the world’s two great economic “-isms” had divided the planet into manageable spheres of influence, with the non-aligned throngs always ripe for recruitment and exploitation. At the end of a day’s toil, the best way for just plain folks to endure the enforced pieties of a May Day parade -- or a 4th of July picnic -- was to remain under the influence.

As Ernest Hemingway reminds us, the bottle is a blessed means of sovereign action. You first drink from it, and then throw it in the direction of the oppressor. In cases of rotgut, you can drink some of it, and then set the remainder aflame just prior to tossing (see “cocktails, Molotov”).

During the Cold War, Russians and Poles chose vodka. Cubans opted for rum. I always imagined the Czechs and Hungarians to be more fortunate than most, seeing as they possessed beer (Pilsner Urquell) and wine (Egri Bikaver) of a higher uniform quality than produced by Warsaw Pact neighbors.

For Americans, there’d be gallons of insipid ice cold light lager and a few pints of Jack Daniels. Choices from our NATO allies might have ranged from English cask bitter to ouzo in Greece, and from schnapps (Germany) to cider (Spain).

It goes to show that as opiates go, booze is vastly preferable to religion.

---

To recap, May Day takes place on May 1, and generally refers to springtime public holidays in the northern hemisphere, where the cultural tradition began long before Marx, Engels and Gus Hall.

For more than 125 years, May Day also has been considered International Workers' Day, which we Americans eventually chucked to another time on the calendar (Labor Day, at summer’s end) so as to avoid confusion with the Commies. Why? Labor and left-wing political movements first established May 1 as International Workers’ Day in memory of those who were killed and wounded during the Haymarket Massacre in 1886, which took place in Chicago.

In all my trips to Europe, only once did I find myself in position to physically attend a May Day parade. It was in Vienna, in 1987. I got up early and walked into the city center from my hostel across from Westbahnhof, finding a comfortable place to stand along the Ringstrasse near City Hall.

The various unions, workplaces and numbered districts each were represented, and at the end, after the sanctioned social elements had marched past, there were series of menacing, piggybacking trailers: Anarchists, Maoists, random radicals and even a mob of hooded Muslim extremists.

Ah yes, I remember it well. Afterwards, I splurged on schnitzel and local draft beer, reflecting on the way that America’s customarily oblivious exceptionalism has detached its labor holiday from the rest of the world’s.

It’s too bad. For us.

Friday, April 15, 2016

A vote for Bernie Sanders.

Yesterday we dropped by the Floyd County clerk's office and voted.

It felt very good to cast a ballot for Bernie Sanders, and afterward, as so often has been the case in the past on the Democratic side, there was no need for me to take a shower.

Water conservation?

Priceless.


Sunday, February 21, 2016

We come not to praise Jeb Bush (!) but to bury him, and as quickly as possible.

My choice for funniest line of the week, courtesy of the inimitable Charlie Pierce at Esquire:

Now, though, Jeb (!) is merely the symbol of a political party and a nominating process gone truly rogue, burning and consuming itself, using itself as its own fuel like some great breeder reactor of rage and fear. Bush, like all the members of the now vestigial Republican "establishment," who spent 30 years developing the perfect context for something like the Trump campaign to occur, was stunned into incoherence when it actually happened. Watching him in his farewell on Saturday night was to recall what Abraham Lincoln said about General William Rosecrans after the Union's defeat at Chickamauga; Rosecrans, Lincoln mused, was "confused and stunned, like a duck hit on the head."

"Like a duck hit on the head."

Ouch, though we need a third Bush about as much as a second Clinton.