Showing posts with label platforms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label platforms. Show all posts

Friday, October 09, 2020

ON THE AVENUES: I'm voting for Biden. Otherwise it's Trump's burgeoning fascist GOP death cult.

photo credit


It’s bizarre the way that memories can stay with us for decades, and then we awaken to find it's hard to recall what we had for lunch yesterday.

For instance, I still remember watching a very scary B&W horror flick when I was a little kid, so terrifying that it still resonates decades later.

In one of the pivotal scenes, a scientist is attacked in a cave by his own mutant creation, a gigantic monstrous blood-sucking vampire spider, which drains the man of all his bodily fluids, leaving him shriveled and bleached out, pasty pale, suitable for nothing except empty calories for the carrion flies.

But let’s not dwell on Mike Pence’s deathly pallor in his debate with Kamala Harris on Wednesday.

I hear the fly wants his money back: "Where's the beef?"

---

And so finally the election draws near.

Don’t worry.

I’m not about to climb down from the dizzying heights of the hill upon which I am fully prepared to drink (to die? Seriously? I wouldn’t consider DYING for these amoral, greedy schmucks – and that’s just the NFL owners), this looming height being my deep, pervasive and abiding disgust with America’s fraudulent two-party political duopoly.

As a genuine social democrat trapped in an anti-intellectual milieu filled with progressive poseurs who can’t muster the chutzpah to contest the dimwits on the other side, my hostility to the Democratic Party peaked in early March, when the capitulating centrists pulled every last string, called in all the necessary markers, and vanquished the party’s left wing.

Had I chosen, I might have devoted this column’s weekly inches ever since April to the myriad failures of the Democrats, beginning with our vacuous local party elites here in the New Albanian swampland, then scaling the slimy pole of unprincipled aff/inf/luence until the Democratic National Committee itself came into view, at which point I would be compelled to excuse myself, step away from the laptop, and slip into a Hazmat suit.

Of course, as damning as the indictments capable of being made against the Democrats, the Republicans have devolved spectacularly from merely objectionable into a drain-circling death cult, of which I’ll have more to say in a moment.

In the sense of our hallowed two-party system of spoils, irrespective of which “side” one chooses to inhabit (to squat?), politics today is a dismal, depressing and depraved journey into the very dark heart of human dysfunction.

By extension, this same old song and dance in American idiocy would have remained roughly the same as always in 2020 if not for the emergence of the COVID-19 virus and the pandemic that followed. Literally for once in our lives, there was a new twist in the tale.

One “side” is failing this test far more spectacularly than the other, and they're the ones I'll be voting against.

---

We’ve observed previously that the COVID-19 virus opportunistically targets vulnerable human physiologies. But the extent to which it has done precisely the same in terms of weakened human psychologies and belief systems simply cannot be underestimated.

We’ve seen already thin remaining layers of civility and sensibility stripped away. The science deniers have “enchantingly” multiplied not unlike Pence’s spider-victim-fly diet of pure excrement, waxing orgasmic as they’ve urged old folks to take one for the greater glory of the stock market. The owners of capital meanwhile have used the occasion to double down, while for the rest of us the economy seized up.

Then the deeper ugliness came forward, the accumulated bile, conspiratorial gibberish and raw hatred, much of it borne of generations-long cognitive dissonance, exploding from the ranks of the right-wing’s white know-nothings as Black Lives Matter demonstrations explicated the systemic persistence of racism and absence of social justice.

Through it all, numerous previous unaddressed crises – climate change, health care, income inequality, basic human rights – didn’t exactly disappear.

To be sure, not every Democrat got the pandemic response memo, and even a few Republicans quietly sidestepped their own party’s institutionalized inadequacies, but the primary outcome of the virus’s own truth-revealing capabilities has been the surgical exposure of the GOP’s fundamental(ist) fascination with dying for the “cause.”

And the cause itself? Someone else’s, as it always has been. Mostly the “cause” of bigger money, with a jot or two of apocalyptic religion, wrapped in a flag, although it’s never clear with these retrograde fantasists whether they mean an American or a Confederate flag.

The Republican death cult is the inevitable outcome of five decades spent busily espousing and later gleefully implementing neoliberal, survival-of-the-fittest economic orthodoxy, as abetted by hypocritical end-times Christian theocrats, and washed down with enough white supremacist Kool-Aid to float a fleet of oil tankers.

We should hardly be surprised at this acceptance of death as inevitable. For years, conservatives have responded to gun violence with angry renunciations of any links to gun proliferation or lax gun control laws, offering instead “thoughts and prayers.” The one exception where Republicans express outrage is over the “death” of fetal cells inside women’s bodies—indicating that the fight is less about “murder,” as the anti-abortionists like to call it, than it is about controlling women’s bodies. By and large, the nation’s right-wing factions have for years wanted us to accept mass deaths and preventable mortality as a price for our “freedom.” They expect the same during a pandemic.

But the Republican death cult truly pole-vaulted over the tipping point, and left Democrats in the dust, when BLM became part of our daily discourse, illustrating that James Baldwin’s words ring more presciently than ever before:

When the Israelis pick up guns, or the Poles, or the Irish, or any white man in the world says “give me liberty, or give me death,” the entire white world applauds. When a black man says exactly the same thing, word for word, he is judged a criminal and treated like one and everything possible is done to make an example of this bad nigger so there won't be any more like him.

Structural racism, white fragility, white supremacy – all of it tied neatly together over a period of four centuries.

---

As malicious and looney-bin ludicrous as Donald Trump most surely remains on an everyday basis, allow me to remind you for perhaps the last time that he’s merely a symptom, and symbolic of the rotting disease within.

Trump’s a salesman with only one product, himself, and one true skill, which is enabling the truly dangerous fascists to worship him as an “answer” and purchase the snake oil.

Bullshit.

If it makes sense to you, as it does to me, that to be white is to be racist by nurture, and if whites as yet are the majority in America, if inexorably declining in terms of raw numbers compared to non-whites – and if whites overwhelmingly support Trump in 2020, as in 2016, then logically, Trump is the fruition of American history to the present time, not an aberration at all.

And, if American history since the Reagan era has been an exercise in unfettered capital accumulation by wealthy elites, enabled by neoliberal economic policies on BOTH sides of the duopoly’s aisles, but as always the very heart of the Republican Party’s preference for oligarchies and extractive, robber baron capitalism as its worst, then once again, Trump is a culmination of sorts.

Guns, money and Jesus; that a majority of white “Christians” find it expedient to indulge the worst demons of their nature with respect to racial and cultural distractions merely suggests that Abraham Lincoln’s conception of “better” angels was wishful thinking at best.

Trump’s siren call is for whites to reaffirm their superiority, the supremacist snowflakes having been shaken to the core by the Obama presidency. If lots and lots of us, up and down the spectrum, can make a blood sacrifice of death via COVID, that’s just icing on their cow pies.

---

Yes, I dislike the DNC, the Democratic Party’s hawkish warmongers, its centrist "liberal" cowardice, the neoliberal economic gutting, and the sheer volume of hypocrisy existing on the left side of the aisle.

Why, then, am I voting for Biden and Harris?

Because of the GOP’s death cult.

Because there comes a time when triage is paramount, and the bleeding must be stopped.

Because while there is no guarantee matters will improve with Biden, there is no chance of improvement with Trump, only further degradation.

Electing Biden and the Democrats won't resolve the fundamental problem of why 60+ million Americans have alchemized a narcissistic con man into a deity, and come together to fluff his personality cult.

(The short answer involves racism/caste, a misplaced sense of powerlessness, and no more comprehensive an education than an ordinary house fly.)

It will, however, remove at least one blithering buffoon from the daily news cycle, so maybe...just maybe...we can convince 10% of the 60 million that the issues go far beyond the charlatan-in-chief, who is little more than a figurehead for self-deception.

Personally, up ticket, it will be all Democrats for me. Locally, in spite of the GOP’s ethical chasm, a precious few Republicans will nonetheless receive my vote. One is an incumbent who’s right for the job. Another is a protest vote against the prevailing NAHS student council nepotocracy.

The third is Greg Roution, a man I've never once met. He’s a Republican running for coroner against Anthony Oxendine, a funereal circus-master who once tried to sneak a crematorium through the back door into my neighborhood and became all doofus petulant when his bluff was called. 

That's all, folks. Go out and vote, vote against the death cult's vulgarians, and don't forget:


 ---



Monday, October 05, 2020

Fire Donald Trump: "We have no illusions about Biden, but we need him to win."


There are times when it's necessary to stop the bleeding first, then determine what's to occur next. This triage scenario is peak 2020. 

I may, or may not, return to this depressing topic in this week's ON THE AVENUES. It's an article in the works for almost two months, with the lightning speed of daily news cycles rendering moot every effort at topicality.  

But I'm not sure it's necessary to know any more than we do already. Electing Biden won't resolve the fundamental problem of why 60+ million Americans have alchemized a narcissistic con man into a deity, and come together to fluff his personality cult. 

(Short answer: racism/casteism and a misplaced sense of powerlessness.)

It will, however, remove at least one blithering idiot from the daily news cycle, so maybe...just maybe...we can convince 10% of the 60 million that the issues go far beyond the charlatan-in-chief, who is little more than a figurehead.   

Fire Donald Trump: We have no illusions about Biden, but we need him to win, at The Nation

 ... Voting Trump out of office will not in itself heal the terrible wounds inflicted on our body politic over the past four years. But it is the absolutely necessary first step. That means voting for Joe Biden—through early voting wherever possible or by absentee or in-person voting when necessary.

We have no illusions about Biden, who—as we reported here last November—removed bankruptcy protections from student loans, helped write the bill that barred states from capping interest rates on interstate banking, and spent a career in the Senate carrying water for Delaware’s credit card industry. The idea that Biden is some kind of sleeper agent for socialism is a cruel joke, as is the claim that he is a closet radical.

The Democratic primaries did include some candidates and ideas that truly are radical. Bernie Sanders—The Nation’s preferred candidate—articulated a vision of Medicare for All and an America where health and education and economic security are human rights. Elizabeth Warren opposed Biden’s favors for the banks and ran on a platform of taking on the monopolist millionaires and robber baron billionaires who have rigged our economy. Yet both of them are voting for Biden.

So are Angela Davis, Noam Chomsky, and Jesse Jackson ...

Wednesday, June 24, 2020

Thomas Frank: "I came here to understand the Biden mystique, not to bury it."


How can self-styled progressives overlook Joe Biden's long legislative career of anti-progressive measures?

Because his name isn't "Donald Trump," and of course the usual left-wing delusion that leads to all genuine precepts being thrown away so the common threat can be met head-on, and then unceremoniously appeased owing to neoliberal donor cash.

The author Frank is no fan of Biden, but he gives it the good old (non)college try.

What's behind Joe Biden's mystique?, by Thomas Frank (The Guardian)

It was once a no-brainer among DC pundits that, in an electoral match-up between a friendly centrist and a bitter polarization-machine like Donald Trump, the guy who was closer to the middle would automatically win. And in the presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden, that conventional wisdom would seem to have found its man: he stands on behalf of no great causes, just a return to the consensus days of yore.

The flaw in this viewpoint is that the consensus days of yore were a dreadful time. What bipartisan centrism meant, in Biden’s heyday, was deliberate, state-sponsored cruelty on a scale so vast it is difficult to comprehend. It meant baked-in racial discrimination. It meant imprisoning enormous numbers of our fellow citizens for using drugs – especially crack cocaine, whose users (disproportionately African American) were singled out for horrendously harsh retribution. It meant three-strikes laws. Mandatory minimum sentencing. Unlimited funding for police departments. A boom in prison construction. And, as it pleased Joe Biden to say on the worst of these occasions, “the truth is, every major crime bill since 1976 that’s come out of this Congress – every minor crime bill – has had the name of the Democratic senator from Delaware, Joe Biden, on that bill.”

Biden has tried half-heartedly to walk back the decades he spent transforming America into a penal state. He may succeed in persuading voters to forgive him. But he’s not going to win because the old centrist strategy has worked and Republicans are fatally outmaneuvered by his clever triangulations. These days even the Charles Koch Institute is to the left of where Biden was back in the crackdown era.

You can say something similar about Biden’s famous rapport with the working class: it is badly compromised by his actual political record ...

So, how does Biden do it?

 ... Catering to society’s well-educated winners is no way to run a party of the left: Biden seems to be one of the few mainstream Democrats to have grasped this. He recalled in the interview being told by a Hillary Clinton operative in 2016 that he “had to make a distinction between progressive values and working-class values”.

“I said I’ve never found a distinction,” Biden claimed he replied. “Never found them hard to sell.” He told the Times about white working-class enthusiasm for gender wage equality and some other issues, and then he took this shot at the very heart of modern-day liberalism: “We treat them like they’re stupid. They know they’re in trouble, and nobody’s talking to them. Nobody’s talking to them. That’s what we used to do. That was our base.”

It is a point in Biden’s favor that he understands this problem. But is he the man to resolve it?

Will it work?

Frank concludes: "My own hope – and it is merely a hope at this point – is that somewhere in the soul of that tongue-tied, old-school Delaware pol flickers the forgotten core value of the Democratic party: solidarity."

Monday, May 06, 2019

Madison mayoral candidate Julie Berry faces the 800-lb gorilla: "There is no greater challenge facing the City of Madison than that of substance abuse."


I know nothing about politics in Madison or the mayoral contest there. I've never met Democratic candidate Julie Berry, but the Madison Courier asked Berry:

"What do you think is the biggest challenge the City of Madison is facing? Why? What would you propose the City do to address the issue?"

She answered with a Substance Abuse Plan for Madison.

I'm not sure what else Berry has to offer, but leading with the issue of substance abuse is admirable, even if it isn't what everyone wants to hear.

A: There is no greater challenge facing the City of Madison than that of Substance Abuse. This issue is negatively impacting families, schools, crime, local business, health and social service providers more than any other challenge in a generation. This challenge is not unique to Madison. Most of our nation’s communities are dealing with this as well.

I have spent hours listening to community stakeholders during the last year while preparing to lead our city. These have included:school officials, business leaders, police officers, hospital officials, members of our justice system, and a host of citizens that call Madison home. To a person they identify substance abuse as the most detrimental threat to our community.

I have prepared a Comprehensive Substance Abuse Plan with detailed Jefferson County statistics, local treatment options, and action steps to help stem this scourge locally. While the full 11 page plan can be viewed at www.julieberryformayor.com, the Plan includes assisting local not-for-profits with a Quarter House option to complement our existing Half Way Houses (Ruth Haven and Jefferson House); A strong Common Nuisance Ordinance to effectively deal with real estate used for the illegal drugs; and Raising local Police Salaries to be competitive with surrounding areas. Currently the Madison Police Dept. is down several officers, and salaries must be raised to attract and retain personnel. These salary increases will come from one of three sources (or a combination of the three):possible revenue from the public safety income tax being proposed by the County; budget cuts; or restructuring of existing budget line items. This is specific information – not rhetoric.

Myself, along with many others, have participated in the Healthy Initiatives Program Substance Abuse/Suicide and Mental Health committees. Over 325 people are participating in this effort. Dedicated volunteers have been working diligently to provide recovery options for those suffering from addiction. Over ¼ of the babies born locally are born to addicted mothers, and are therefore addicted themselves at birth. I call that a crisis. I pledge to be personally involved in reclaiming our community from the scourge of substance abuse.

Friday, February 15, 2019

In the mayor's race, David White is saying exactly what needs to be said.


Important Friday reading, borrowed from the David White for Mayor website. There'll be much more to discuss about antidotes to cliquish, fix-is-in Gahanism, but these surely are the most important points for those of us in the Resistance.

---

STOP! Deception, Dishonesty & Bullying

For over two decades, I have been an active, respectful and supportive member of my party's leadership and platforms. However, it appears that here in New Albany, a few of our Democratic Party leaders have lost their guide star, lost the stewardship of public trust and abandoned the principles once held so closely. There was a time I clearly remember the core Democratic Party values were truth, integrity, inclusion, and helping the most vulnerable. In this city, under this mayor and his clique of cronies, these values have been replaced by deception and bullying, class warfare, and greed.

Unlike Mayor Gahan, I won't pretend that homelessness or housing insecurity isn't a problem in our city. As Mayor, I will develop a sensible plan for housing our most vulnerable neighbors, and I will do so with a new executive director of the housing authority. I won't demolish public housing without a 1 for 1 replacement plan. Further, I would never turn down a $12 million federal grant, as Mayor Gahan did – a grant that could have helped us modernize our public housing for years to come.

STOP! Non-transparency

As mayor, I will be transparent about funding used for major projects and development. Conversely, Mayor Gahan continues to take payments from every contractor he’s hired for city projects. Between city contractors and appointees, Mayor Gahan has taken over $200,000. Instead of reducing cost on city projects, he frivolously spends taxpayer money, then takes payments for his personal re-election campaign. Question: Why does he need so much money?

I am all for progress, but not if the people of New Albany stop being Priority ONE. It shouldn’t be projects over people, but instead People First! My administration will engage in smart and strategic growth that actually makes sense for New Albany. I pledge to not accept any donations from contractors hired by or in consideration for business with the City.

Additionally, the State Board of Accounts continues to find inaccurate and improper accounting practices and this administration refuses to give a full disclosure of debt.

STOP! Feuding Between City And County

As Mayor, I pledge to encourage cooperation between city and county. Today, I stand before you at your city-county building. Built in 1963, it is a testament to the unity that once existed between the two – something our hometown was lauded for. Try to imagine that in light of today's petty bickering between Mayor Gahan and the Floyd County government! Why would the city spend an additional $15 million on a new city hall? Simply because Mayor Gahan refuses to coexist.

We have a great story as a city. That story needs to be told often, professionally, and broadly. Additionally, we must consider neighboring communities and businesses as collaborative friends – not competitors.

As Mayor, I will take the lead and change the perception of New Albany as a regional partner.

  • It is great place to live and work.
  • We are a viable center of global commerce.
  • Join forces with other communities and businesses in our region to accelerate our population growth.
  • Collaborate for a 'win-win" outcome of attracting diverse talent.
It is time to aggressively market and promote New Albany. Our city needs a bold, unified, and passionate voice encouraging others to move and live here.

STOP! Growing Debt

Driving around this city you will find expensive, "shiny projects" that Mayor Gahan has pushed upon us while creating over $300 million of debt over the last seven years. He calls this economic development and quality of life improvements. Question: When people work 40 hours a week and still go home to poverty and debt, how is that economic development and quality of life improvement?

  • Spent $20 million for a swimming pool that's open 70 days a year, loses money and most cannot afford.
  • Spent $1 million for a dog park, knowingly and disrespectfully built on a Native American burial ground.
  • Gave $3 million to Summit Springs, a private developer for a hotel, but he was in a lawsuit against them.
  • Spent $4 million for two-ways streets still dangerous because the Speck Plan was not followed.

The list of debts goes on and on. . .

He has swiped the city "credit card" (Tax Increment Financing, or TIF) to create these projects, which in turn give millions of dollars to private contractors. Every one of these "shiny projects" has come at a price, and specifically at a price to you (taxes and utility rates).

This is an opportunity for the citizens of New Albany to gain your city back. That's why I am asking each and every one of you to do your part. The last mayoral primary was decided by 3,400 people out of a residency of 38,000.

The time has come for change and that change can start with you! It is time to fire Mayor Gahan and put the People First.

Saturday, November 24, 2018

Among Democrats elsewhere, progressive economics are ascendant. Here, it's all about a Baked Sale.


The problem for local Democratic cadres as they approach the rapids (municipal elections in 2019) is that 2018 midterm results gave them nothing (ahem) worth dropping anchor.

Consider for a moment the devotion inspired by epic loser Joe "Slavishly Licking Donald Trump's Loafers" Donnelly among the older Democrats; meanwhile, big losses suffered by somewhat left-of-center female candidates Anna Murray and Liz Watson seemed to suggest the task ahead is hopeless.

After Jeff Gahan and four mediocre council "Democrats," the deluge. How will they compete in 2019?

To the left? They don't know how.

To the right? But as Donnelly proved conclusively, if a pretend-Democrat veers too far Falangist, voters will opt for an unalloyed GOP candidate and not the substitute.

Gahan's assets are a cult of personality and lots of money. Will any of it trickle down to the Democratic council candidates?

The obvious answer: Democratic Bake Sale!


My suggestion is to stockpile Rice Krispies Treats and enjoy the show.

Progressive Economics Are Ascendant—Among Democrats, and at the Ballot Box, by Chris Hughes (The Nation)

It’s good politics and good policy, and should be a winning formula in 2020.

With the results of the November midterm elections, we have officially witnessed the end of Rubinomics. Former Treasury secretary Bob Rubin was the ringleader of an incremental, neoliberal economics ascendant in the Democratic Party in the 1990s and through the Obama years. The Rubin school oversaw the deregulation of banking and finance, free-trade agreements with insufficient worker and environmental protections, and the dismantling of core parts of the safety net with Bill Clinton’s “welfare reform” of 1996. These economists, taking a page from Ronald Reagan, argued that markets self-regulate if we just leave them alone.

History has proven them wrong, and this month’s elections signaled the start of a fresh approach. A decade out from the Great Recession, wages are still stagnant, and the cost of living is spiraling out of control. Even though typical economic indicators, like the low unemployment rate, suggest we live in a strong economy, exit polls show that only a third of voters say their own financial situation has improved in the past two years.

A new cohort of candidates this year chose to run on a clear, unapologetic economic progressivism as good politics and good policy. A new analysis found that two-thirds of the incoming Democratic freshman class in Congress campaigned on some form of Medicare for All or the expansion of Social Security. Nearly 80 percent campaigned on tax credits that benefit working families or on rolling back Trump’s tax cuts for the wealthy ...

Saturday, June 10, 2017

And we have a winner in the Greenway Landing caption contest.


Congratulations to Stephen Scott, the LeBron James of NAC caption contests.

But Mark Cassidy's is pretty good, too.


Great minds satirize alike, don't you think?

Sunday, July 31, 2016

How long will Adam Dickey allow Steve Bonifer to talk about poverty and jobs before the muzzle and the chairman's honed incisors daintily flash?


Against all odds, Steve Bonifer has offered voters one and a half interesting sentences at his campaign web site.

Let us pause to celebrate this amazing achievement.

I'd have bet a five-spot that Adam Dickey would speedily excise any attempt at genuine platform content undertaken by one of his stable of well-groomed, ambitious future political fundraisers and gravy-ladling functionaries.

Bonifer, who is the mayor's brother-in-law ("New Albany Is Where You Should Be in One Famil-ee"), is running against Ed Clere in the District 72 House race. Bonifer also is the third consecutive school teacher to run against Clere, and that's just plain weird, isn't it?

Did the teacher's union bid that job? Meanwhile, I've highlighted the interesting one and a half sentences.

For the past eight years, I have seen my state regressing in many areas of concern to me. Infrastructure improvements, a multitude of education issues, equality of rights under the law for all residents, and the problems that stem from poverty in our state. We need meaningful, financially rewarding job opportunities for all of our citizens. These issues and more should guide decision-making and priorities in spending future tax dollars and the tax dollars the state has already collected.

During his 2015 campaign for mayor, Jeff Gahan studiously avoided mention of poverty and jobs. It looks like someone didn't get the talking points memo at the last Family gathering.

It probably will be found down by the levee, wrapped around some cigars. Is the flood control son-in-law still on the job, or has it passed to Mickey now?

Monday, May 09, 2016

“He’ll take Mr. Sanders’s aspirational approach over Mrs. Clinton’s caution any day.”

“Democrats who want to win a big majority in November, to take back the Congress and to move forward in the states, know that the party has to stand for something that excites young people, that excites working people. No matter who the nominee is, the party has to take a big-vision stand.”

Water park!

Boomtown!

A place to walk your dog!

Those are big ideas, right?

A Contested Convention Is Exactly What the Democratic Party Needs, by John Nichols (The Nation)

Bernie Sanders will go to Philadelphia with more pledged delegates than any insurgent in modern history. Here’s what he could do with them.

Joe Biden understands something about the Democratic Party and its future that his fellow partisans would do well to consider. “I don’t think any Democrat’s ever won saying, ‘We can’t think that big—we ought to really downsize here because it’s not realistic,’” the vice president told The New York Times in April. “C’mon man, this is the Democratic Party! I’m not part of the party that says, ‘Well, we can’t do it.’” Mocking Hillary Clinton’s criticism of Bernie Sanders for proposing bold reforms, Biden dismissed the politics of lowered expectations. “I like the idea of saying, ‘We can do much more,’ because we can,” he declared, leading the Times to observe that, while Biden wasn’t making an endorsement, “He’ll take Mr. Sanders’s aspirational approach over Mrs. Clinton’s caution any day.”

Friday, October 09, 2015

Campaign Diary, Vol. 8: My answers in the News and Tribune questionnaire.


I've submitted my answers to the News and Tribune candidate questionnaire, and here they are.

---

NAME

Roger Baylor

OFFICE YOU ARE SEEKING

Mayor of New Albany

AGE

55

POLITICAL PARTY

Independent

POLITICAL EXPERIENCE

None, although I refuse to hold the political experience of my opponents against them.

FAMILY

My wife is Diana Baylor, a native of Maine, who is a social worker at Seven Counties Services in Louisville. Seeing as we have no children, most of my cousins live elsewhere, and my mother is retired, you needn’t fear nepotism from a Baylor administration.

OCCUPATION

Since 1990, I’ve been engaged in the craft brewing and restaurant business. I’m co-owner of the New Albanian Brewing Company (Pizzeria & Public House) and Bank Street Brewhouse, and also have been published as a free-lance writer. My interests include reading, cooking, walking, bicycling and music.

RELATED PERTINENT EXPERIENCE

I currently serve on the Board of Directors of the Brewers of Indiana Guild and am secretary of the New Albany Restaurant & Bar Association. Previous positions include the boards of the New Albany Urban Enterprise Association and Develop New Albany.

YOUR WEBSITE (IF APPLICABLE) [IF NONE, ANSWER N/A]

baylorformayor.com
www.cityofnewalbany.blogspot.com

PLEASE PROVIDE AN EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CONFIRMATION PURPOSES

mayorbaylor@gmail.com

NEW ALBANY MAYOR

WHY ARE YOU RUNNING FOR THIS OFFICE?

New Albany has come a long way in recent years, and as an independent local businessman right in the middle of this revitalization, I’ve seen the inexhaustible willingness of local entrepreneurs to work hard and invest, as well as the support and enthusiasm of New Albany’s residents, who really want to see improvement in the quality of their lives.

I’ve also seen how little of this progress is driven by our political culture, and that’s why I’m running for mayor. We need a different pair of eyes to see what’s coming next.

Currently the city of New Albany is controlled by the Democratic Party, and while I’ve been left-leaning my whole life, the Gahan administration simply doesn‘t have what it takes to prioritize and innovate for the city’s future. On the other hand, Floyd County is run by the Republican Party, and the county is starved, financially as well as intellectually. One party has a stranglehold on the city, and the other on the county.

Where’s the choice in that?

Why run as an independent? A better question would be, why not?

The usual suspects are NO LONGER AN OPTION. Two major parties may share power, but they don’t have a monopoly of ideas. In fact, the best ideas don’t even come from political parties. They come from real people, and deserve a fair hearing.

The two-party system here is broken, and it’s not going to get any better on its own. And for most of us, governance isn’t about party affiliation, anyway. It’s about managing competently, planning rationally and producing results every single day – right here in New Albany -- where we live and work and play.

WHAT MAKES YOU THE BEST CANDIDATE FOR THIS OFFICE?

I’m not a politician, but 25 years as a local independent business owner has equipped me with a useful tool box. Local independent business owners strive to maintain a level playing field for consumers. We listen, accommodate, troubleshoot, manage employees and solve problems as they arise. We create tangible value from scratch, as with the American craft beer industry.

I’ve also traveled through America and Europe, paying attention to life and learning how things work. I’ve probably attended more council meetings than some elected council persons, and maintained a public affairs blog (NA Confidential) for the past 11 years.

I’m uniquely placed to break the two-party stalemate in New Albany and Floyd County, and to be a bridge to the next generation of leaders. I have no political party to serve, only the people of New Albany, and I won’t ever forget that. As your mayor, neither my name nor the names of elected officials will appear on plaques. “The City of New Albany” means all the people, not just a privileged few. My team will manage your investment in this community, and to provide an equitable return. It’s going to be about us, not me.

WHAT IS THE MOST PRESSING ISSUE FACING THIS OFFICE AND HOW WOULD YOU PROPOSE HANDLING IT?

TIF bonds do not a civic mission statement make. It’s time to stop thinking about New Albany in terms of past glories and how we can borrow to restore them, and begin viewing this city in a future context. What’s our specific place in metro Louisville? What kind of municipality do we intend to be?

Long-term thinking begins with deep analysis – how are we going to pay for Jeff Gahan’s spending spree for WANTS, and return the focus to fundamental NEEDS. It won’t be easy. There is no single pressing issue, but rather a laundry list of interconnected challenges:


  • Transparency, and the need for more sunlight and fewer decisions by appointed boards
  • Infrastructure: Streets, sewers, storm water and communications
  • Empowerment, and taking care of our own people first
  • Localism in economic development
  • Affordable housing and homelessness
  • Rental property registration and inspection
  • Economic inequality and sub-par wages
  • The effect of bridge tolls
  • Human rights and civil liberties


The list goes on, but in the end, quality of life isn’t measured by flower beds planted along just one street, a water park useful for only for a few months a year, or musical concerts funded by taxpayer money. A mayor isn’t supposed to be a combination of Elvis, PT Barnum and Walt Disney.

The mayor must administer and manage the city’s infrastructure every day, not every now and then, striving to improve quality of life by means of a level daily playing field for all citizens, not only the privileged few. City government’s job is to keep public services working, maintain public safety, and set the table for private enterprise to invest, provide jobs and multiply choices.

These actions must occur transparently, without prejudice, and with as much public participation as can reasonably be provided. Because few of these mandates are being pursued at present, perhaps the most pressing issue facing New Albany is restoring a sense of shared purpose to City Hall, and to do so fairly and openly.

WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT STEPS THE CITY CAN TAKE TO ATTRACT GOOD JOBS TO NEW ALBANY?

It would help to ask the right questions about what good jobs really mean in this day and age. We’re at a crossroads in terms of economic development. In the past, having industrial park acreage was sufficient for deploying the usual “boilerplate” economic development tools like subsidies, incentives and tax abatements, but we’re being hit with a double whammy.

First, modern economies require modern infrastructure, which we’re lagging behind in offering, as in fiber optic communications.

Second, the advent of River Ridge Commerce Center in Clark County – the state’s chosen regional winner – means that henceforth, someone else can always do “boilerplate” far better than us.

Therefore, we need to do economic development differently than before. There’ll likely be no more Pillsbury plants, but there can be a greater number of small companies to spread risks and rewards. We must shift our economic development strategies to meet these challenges, by focusing on localism, start-ups, entrepreneurs and grassroots economic initiatives.

Localism is vital. As the American Independent Business Alliance says:

“Multiple studies show locally-owned independent restaurants return twice as much per dollar of revenue to our local economy than chain restaurants. And independent retailers return more than three times as much money per dollar of sales than chain competitors.”

Consequently, New Albany’s economic development strategies must be directed toward greater recognition of the key role played by independent local businesses. We need genuine infrastructure enhancement, spread throughout the city rather than concentrated in one place, including fiber optic, multi-modal two-way streets and incubation/pollination incentives.

WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE IS THE BEST WAY TO ADDRESS NEW ALBANY’S DOWNTOWN STREET GRID, IF AT ALL?

Two ways are better than one. Period. The evidence is in, and the verdict is returned.

I am the city’s foremost advocate for traffic calming, complete streets and the prompt and comprehensive restoration of the city’s original two-way street grid. We’ve paid Jeff Speck, the nation’s foremost engineering expert to explain exactly how and why two-way streets work. Now we must take Speck’s study off the dusty shelf and implement it.

Immediately.

One-way streets were a 1960-era suburban solution to urban problems that no longer exist, and nowadays they act as invasive high-speed interstate highways slicing dangerously through densely populated urban neighborhoods. As such, a preponderance of research shows that maintaining these wide-lane, high-speed, pass-through arterial streets reduce neighborhood and core business district property values.

They also make walking and biking unsafe. Speed kills, and any city genuinely concerned with public safety for people, not just their cars, recognize a responsibility to promote safety by design.

While one-way streets work against other revitalization efforts, research proves that two-way streets encourage a number of positive outcomes, ranging from increased quality of life in neighborhoods to a more level playing field for local independent business, and including the enhancement of property values and reduced crime.

Calmed two-way streets do not exclude large commercial vehicles, which must drive more slowly via narrower lanes, which in turn help redefine the terms of engagement by promoting multi-modal use. Better still, two-way streets and infrastructure designed to promote walking and biking are the New Albany equivalent of Jeffersonville’s Big Four Bridge, because our up and coming generations demand these options.

Walkability and bikeability are realities capable of being harnessed to connect neighborhoods with the central business district, and link the same neighborhoods to outlying “thinking” destinations like IU Southeast and the Purdue Center. We have transportation corridors, and they need to be capable of being used by everyone.

Two-way completed streets made suitable for all persons, not just those piloting motorized vehicles, should be the stated, above-board, publicly advanced and ultimate goal. I’ll begin working toward this goal on January 1, 2016.

HOW WOULD YOU ADDRESS THE CITY’S DILAPIDATED BUILDINGS AND UNSIGHTLY PROPERTIES?

The logical first step is consistent ordinance enforcement, because if we continue to demolish properties while remaining passive as to their systematic neglect, we’ll someday run out of buildings to tear down. That would be a shame, and not just because the demolition kickbacks would cease.

It’s because (a) the greenest building there can be is the one already standing, and (b) historic preservation adds inestimable value to the urban core.

For the past 12 years, Democrats have held the mayor’s chair and a huge majority of council seats, and there has been almost no progress toward ordinance enforcement or an accompanying program to incentivize infill construction in those instances (far fewer than you might think) when demolition is the only choice. At the same time, we’re throwing millions (including sewer tap-in waivers) at an Indianapolis developer to build “luxury” apartments at the Coyle site.

What if a fraction of this amount went to encourage affordable infill housing? It’s an idea worth pursuing.

WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE ARE APPROPRIATE USES FOR TAX-INCREMENT FINANCING FUNDS?

As an economic development tool, TIF should be safe, legal and rare.

TIF is intended as government’s tithe toward basic infrastructure as a spur for private investment and development – not to take the place of private investment and development by funding 100% of top-down, government-inspired capital projects, which have become little more than bright shiny objects to propel re-election campaigns.

The Gahan administration’s funding of park expansion with TIF puts the cart before the horse. The debt thus incurred to achieve one man’s questionable vision will handicap future municipal governments, while failing to produce the economic progress we need now to raise the tax base. TIF abuse forces us to pay a higher price for “wants,” because in addition to the price of bright shiny objects, there is an opportunity cost in the form of what we might have done instead.

TIF also obscures the budgetary process. Mayor Gahan’s presumably balanced budget does not take into consideration these bonded capital “improvement” projects, which add up to somewhere around $100 million in bonded debt, payable with interest over decades.

It’s a good thing your grandchildren like the water park. They’ll still be paying for it after you’re gone, when they have children of their own.

WOULD YOU SUPPORT NEW ALBANY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS WEARING BODY CAMERAS?

There is a case to be made for police body-worn cameras, which can boost accountability and the delivery of justice, but we must be careful not to see these as some sort of perfect solution to the evolution of better policing.

We’re early in the game when it comes to camera programs. There are issues yet to be resolved, among them procedural. When do the cameras roll, and when do they stop? What about privacy and public records requests?

These issues eventually will be resolved, and so I generally favor police-worn cameras, though not in a policy vacuum. The fundamental role of police in the community must be clearly defined and constantly reinforced through community-oriented policing and ongoing training in areas like crisis intervention.

Plainly, the more our police know, the better they can reply to a constantly changing scene. Cameras are part of this program, though not the only component. In this area, as with the other mentioned previously, better communication always is a fundamental step.

As mayor, I’ll begin by meeting with the entire police department – something the current mayor hasn’t found time to do in four whole years.

Thursday, September 03, 2015

ON THE AVENUES: When even Mitt Romney can run to the left of New Albany’s Democrats, it's a very big problem.

ON THE AVENUES: When even Mitt Romney can run to the left of New Albany’s Democrats, it's a very big problem.

A weekly web column by Roger A. Baylor.

Since I announced my candidacy for mayor of New Albany as an independent, I’ve been asked this question more than once.

“But Roger, aren’t you afraid you’ll pull votes away from the Democrats, and the Republican candidate will win?”

Seeing as a two-party system is considered normal in a nation where Coca-Cola alone vends 500 brands of non-alcoholic beverages, it should be fairly obvious that I must pull votes from one or both parties, or I won’t get very many.

So yes, but it’s important to understand the dynamic involved in this electoral calculation, for while it’s far too early to know whether Kevin Zurschmiede will be the ultimate beneficiary of Jeff Gahan’s self-possessed vanity candidacy, the ballot indeed is set, and there's nothing at all we can do about Gahan selfishly siphoning votes away from the only genuine Democrat left in the mayoral race.

This being me.

---

It naturally depends on the meaning of the word Democrat, and whether the word Democrat actually has any discernible meaning in New Albany, right here at the grassroots level where the political process begins.

Republicans, bear with me now as I attempt to identify the local Democratic species. I fear it may have mutated.

Is one a Democrat by virtue of paid membership, as in a club, or is it explained by fealty to the fried mushrooms available annually at Harvest Homecoming?

Could it be the sum total of voting patterns? Does it have to do with family traditions and heredity?

Or, must a Democrat possess a coherent system of fundamental values and actions, such as those listed in a (gasp) party platform?

I suppose being a Democrat might entail any or all of these, although to me, the game’s not worth the flame without the platform, and those pesky values and actions therein.

We turn to the Democratic National Committee for clues:

For more than 200 years, Democrats have represented the interests of working families, fighting for equal opportunities and justice for all Americans.

Our party was founded on the conviction that wealth and privilege shouldn’t be an entitlement to rule and the belief that the values of hardworking families are the values that should guide us.

We didn’t become the most prosperous country in the world by rewarding greed and recklessness or by letting those with the most influence write their own rules. We got here by rewarding hard work and responsibility, by investing in people, and by growing our country from the bottom up.

Today Democrats are fighting to repair a decade of damage and grow an economy based on the values of Main Street, not greed and reckless speculation. Democrats are focused on rescuing our economy not just in the short run but also rebuilding our economy for the long run—an economy that lifts up not just some Americans, but all Americans.


Now, these local “Democrats” to whom my questioners are referring … who are they again?

Let’s see.

They’re the ones who have occupied the mayor’s chair for the past twelve years, with council majorities during this same period of 8-1, 8-1 and 7-1-1, and with these overwhelming majorities, the Democrats have accomplished … uh … er … well …

That’s right.

Very little.

Buy another round of ice-cold Bud Light Limes, because it ain’t very pretty. Let’s take a closer look at the ideological scorecard, and compare the national Democratic Party’s platform points with local “Democratic” practice.

National Platform:
Democrats have represented the interests of working families, fighting for equal opportunities and justice for all Americans.

Local Practice:
Pervasive silence, as when Dan “Mr. Local Democrat” Coffey uttered homophobic slurs at a city council meeting and was filmed in the act, and neither Gahan nor his party has had the first thing to say about it. Not only that, but the Human Rights and Ethics Commissions enabled by council Democrats were stillborn, and designed to fail.

National Platform:
Wealth and privilege shouldn’t be an entitlement to rule and the belief that the values of hardworking families are the values that should guide us.

Local Practice:
While spending hundreds of dollars per foot to increase property values on a street that already was situated atop local valuation charts, City Hall looked the other way as General Mills spent many years openly preparing to close Pillsbury, and when the day of reckoning finally came, Gahan could do no more than ineptly feign shock and concoct half-cocked performance art to “honor” the values of hardworking Pillsbury families by insulting their intelligence.

The mayor’s brilliant plan? Imagine $7 million in economic development funds and toss the bags of Monopoly money in the general direction of the moving vans as they queued to depart, safe in the knowledge that it was a done deal, anyway. Honor? Such was the embarrassment that it gradually begins to make sense that Gahan’s handlers never allow him to speak in public.

National Platform:
We didn’t become the most prosperous country in the world by rewarding greed and recklessness or by letting those with the most influence write their own rules.

Local Practice:
Never in history had the city of New Albany waived sewer tap-in fees for a property developer, at least until Gahan noticed the words “business of residence” mentioned in an otherwise unread Wall Street Journal editorial, and decided to award waivers to the big-dollar, influential Flaherty and Collins firm from Indianapolis, whose plan for redeveloping the Coyle site includes a bocce ball court, the best internet service in town and other “upscale” and “luxury” amenities – while rental properties a block away remain free of regulation and hazardous to the health of their occupants.

When this top-down proposal came before the Redevelopment Commission, both Coffey and local Democratic Party chairman Adam Dickey enthusiastically voted in favor.

That’s right: The chairman has been appointed to this position. His wife works in city government. The mayor’s son-in-law has a business degree, and is in charge of the floodwall. But see: No one’s writing his own rules here in New Albany.

National Platform:
We got here by rewarding hard work and responsibility, by investing in people, and by growing our country from the bottom up.

Local Practice:
A disproportionate share of living spaces in New Albany are rental properties, and so naturally, after 12 solid years of Democratic dominance, there remain no rental property registration or inspection programs. Basic ordinance enforcement, from downtown parking to municipal cleanliness, still is subject to arbitrary whim and daily coin tosses.

Meanwhile, City Hall’s over-arching rationale for projects like the water park and the Coyle site luxury apartment complex has been the vague possibility of a “ripple effect” from the top down, or in the phrase Will Rogers coined during the Great Depression, “trickle-down” – a practice last associated with Republicans during the Reagan administration, and one almost never confused with development from the “bottom up.”

National Platform:
Democrats are fighting to repair a decade of damage and grow an economy based on the values of Main Street, not greed and reckless speculation.

Local Practice:
During the Gahan term, the city’s budget has come close to doubling. Bonded indebtedness and debt service outlays are skyrocketing, with somewhere between $30 and $40 million bonded in the last four years alone, pledged against future property tax revenues to pay for showpiece “bread and circus” capital construction projects, like a water park being used by children who’ll still be paying for it when they have kids of their own – and when City Hall finally noticed the national party platform’s citing of the “values of Main Street,” it didn’t involve advancing the economy (for example) by growing the increasingly important independent small business segment, but rather by appeasing a vocal minority through the expenditure of millions of dollars to beautify a scant mile of Main Street, a project so resoundingly unpopular that at last, the “ripple effect” was proven genuine, and sorely-needed street calming and two-way traffic solutions elsewhere are maligned by outraged taxpayers as “just another Main Street boondoggle,” and consequently held hostage by the mayor’s own pervasive political cowardice.

National Platform:
Democrats are focused on rescuing our economy not just in the short run but also rebuilding our economy for the long run—an economy that lifts up not just some Americans, but all Americans.

Local Practice
Apart from the usual economic development abatements, giveaways and boilerplate (a term used non-ironically by City Hall itself), there is no tangible evidence of Gahan’s administration accomplishing even the first initiative designed to boost New Albany’s economy in the long term.

There is scarcely any mention of the economy at all; rather, all we hear on a daily basis is North Korean-style propaganda exhortations about nice, shiny objects gifted to us by the all-knowing leader. Paraphrasing the late, Carpathian-born and unlamented Nicolae Ceausescu, Jeff Gahan has become our “Genius of the Flood Plain.”

Outmoded trucking and industrial businesses actively impede the quality of life and future economic development potential downtown, while 40 acres of industrial park land languishes unoccupied on the north side of the city.

There have been no efforts to utilize IU Southeast or Purdue Polytechnic in programs benefiting working people, but we’re quick to reward chains and big boxes to “create” more poverty-level jobs, perpetuate income inequality, and lay asphalt so as to divert even more storm water to an unresponsive, overwhelmed system.

---

We’re constantly told that if enough is done to subsidize, monetize, incentivize, enrich and attract those with proper monetary and demographic endowments, probably some of it eventually will leach down to the masses, and if it were a Republican saying this, I’d yawn, because that’s how Republicans do it, right?

Except that in New Albany, it is the Democratic Party saying and doing these things.

Rather, they’re calling themselves Democrats, but as can be seen quite clearly, if you identify with Democratic principles as outlined in the national platform, it is almost impossible to find local evidence of them in practice, right here, at the grassroots level.

Are you a Democrat? It’s time to think carefully about what this means in real, daily, working terms. If disappointed, you have an alternative when it comes time to cast a ballot. To read more about how I think, go here: Baylor for Mayor: 3 Goals + 7 Platform Points.

As always, thanks for reading.

---

Recent columns:

ON THE AVENUES: Whips, chains and economic development (2010).

August 20: ON THE AVENUES: In the groove.

August 13: ON THE AVENUES: It’s time to purge two-party politics and tie the community together.

August 10: ON THE AVENUES SPECIAL EDITION: When it comes to the RCI, can the RDA opt out of the RFRA?

August 6: ON THE AVENUES: Money is the ultimate bully.

July 30: ON THE AVENUES: Homegrown New Albany, but not in a good way.

Saturday, August 22, 2015

Hey, ESNA.


The missus and I live within the boundaries of the East Spring Street Neighborhood Association (ESNA). We moved into our house on Spring Street in October, 2003. This blog began in October, 2004, and my first-ever blog reference to ESNA came in November, 2004.

There is a reason for mentioning this.

I'm running for mayor as an independent. While my candidacy is not restricted to any one area or neighborhood in the city of New Albany, it is no exaggeration to suggest that my platform almost perfectly jibes with the long-term aims of ESNA.

In fact, it seems to be a all-embracing composite of what we've discussed these many years.

The beauty of it is that these precepts apply equally to all the city's areas and neighborhoods, even if they're particularly applicable to ESNA's.

Baylor for Mayor: 3 Goals + 7 Platform Points.

As for the political ramifications, it may or may not be true that Kevin Zurschmiede will be the ultimate beneficiary, but the ballot is set, and there's nothing I can do about the likelihood of Jeff Gahan's strange vanity candidacy siphoning votes from the only genuine Democrat left in the mayoral race.

That Democrat is me, and conscience is key.

Campaign Diary, Chapter 3: Insurgencies, signage and conscience.

All I ask is that you look at my candidacy rationally. Neither Gahan nor Zurschmiede really gets where you're coming from. They cannot, and they never will. Their political clubs come first, not you.

This isn't propaganda.

It's simple fact. I appreciate your support ... even if you can't announce it.

The East Spring Street Neighborhood Association Inc. is formed to foster the ongoing revitalization of the area, and to improve the quality of life for those who live and work within the association boundaries. Additionally the association is designated as follows:

To be a forum for the discussion & review of community issues & projects

To be an advisory body & advocate to our elected representatives on behalf of our members

To monitor & facilitate public services & infrastructure investments within our association boundaries

To educate & establish communications in the community & to externally promote New Albany

To develop solutions to community issues & to shape the future vision of New Albany

To seek grants and other funds for community projects

To implement, promote, or coordinate with other agencies and programs for the protection, safety and enhancement of the neighborhood community

We have also just recently gained our non-profit status as a 501C3.

Monday, August 17, 2015

Baylor for Mayor: 3 Goals + 7 Platform Points.


I’m running for mayor of New Albany as an independent candidate in order to provide voters with a choice. It’s as simple as that. It is my core conviction that locally, we have a two-party system standing for very little in terms of coherent platform principle, apart from doing whatever is necessary to preserve its shared monopoly of power.

Republicans have the county, Democrats the city. For decades, the Democratic Party machine has remained pre-eminent in New Albany, with long-serving politicians like Jeff Gahan burrowed deeply within this apparatus of patronage and control, and yet almost everything positive accomplished in New Albany during the recent era of revival has come in spite of the party machine, not because of it.

It is exhausting to always wrestle progress from the cold, dead hands of big fish in small ponds, and yet each step of the way, it’s been the default mechanism in New Albany.

Many of us are sick of this, and it must change.

I truly believe there are alternatives to the same tired civic rituals, practiced by the usual underachieving political suspects, and which come down to three priorities. If aggressively implemented, I contend they can tie this community together and help New Albany achieve its potential.

Transparency
Infrastructure
Empowerment

Here are seven Baylor for Mayor platform planks.

Honesty in government
Budget sanity
Fix infrastructure
Ordinance enforcement
Local economy first
Democracy & social justice
Two way streets NOW

They’re inter-related, which points to something important: When government acts, it should try whenever possible to connect these actions to best achieve multiple positive results, which reinforce each other. Doing so is the best use of money and time, and it doesn’t take a business person to know it. You do it in your own homes and workplaces.

City Hall can do it, too … and we will.

Honesty in government

This is job one. Jeff Gahan’s City Hall has been the least transparent in recent memory, and the consequences have been crippling. Daily information has been safeguarded like crown jewels, and far too many decisions have been taken by appointed boards, rather than elected officials. Public input has been rendered inert, either by calculated infrequency (the aquatic center and accompanying $20 million parks bond, and the Coyle site giveaway) or sheer organizational ineptitude (the three Speck meetings). It does not help that public meetings (Board of Works, Redevelopment) dealing with important decisions are held at inconvenient times for working people, and that we do not harness widely available electronic mediums to film and disseminate them.

Consequently, in the interests of greater transparency, I’ll dedicate the necessary resources to ensure robust two-way communications and conversations between the city and its citizens. My aim is equal governance and a level playing field, and so I will promote transparency every single day at City Hall, not every now and then. Finally, I will commence a deep cleansing of management level personnel in City Hall. New thinking is needed to stimulate the “same old, same old” management culture, which is in-bred and unresponsive. We’ll take applications, interview candidates, and find new talent, because our city employees already work hard. They need bosses who work smart.

Budget sanity

I support a sane, sustainable budget, something that is not currently being provided by Democrats, and which is not to be considered an exclusive province of the GOP. I will not sacrifice long-term budgetary sustainability for short-term glitz and glitter. On the one hand, Gahan’s astronomical bonded debt will be with us for decades to come, placing an ever greater strain on his illusory budgets. On the other, a Zurschmiede administration’s budgetary model would be that of Republicans in Floyd County government: Starvation rations, bread made from sawdust and the occasional corn husk. Disneyland versus North Korea? These are not the only two choices. It’s going to take an independent candidate like me to find truth between the extremes – and I will, because our real infrastructure needs will require investment.

Fix infrastructure

Maintaining the city’s public infrastructure and effectively utilizing our physical assets isn’t sexy. It’s essential, and it’s also about every single day, not every now and then. Like much of America, New Albany has neglected these fundamental needs, and yet they are the conditions that matter most right where you live. Everything else we do as a city extends from strong fundamental physical infrastructure: Streets, sidewalks, sewers, storm water and many more similar functions, big and small. These tasks comprise the city’s bones and blood.

Two-way streets are the perfect illustration: Speck them to spec, and watch as street design and expanded walkability support and enhance other measures already aimed at bolstering neighborhood revitalization, property values and independent business success – rather than actively work against them in a cloud of semi-trailer fumes and vehicular speed. It is my contention that quality of life cannot be imposed from the top down, but must rise from the grassroots up. Without better infrastructure management, this is not possible. We’ll analyze these areas from the ground up, and plan for success by design – every day, not every now and then.

Ordinance enforcement

Equal governance and level playing fields cannot be attained without consistent and principled ordinance enforcement, as applied professionally and separated from petty politics. To cite just one example, the city of New Albany still does not have a rental property registration and inspection program in the year 2015.

Here is another: Parking ordinances are enforced in some places and not others – and no one knows where the non-enforcement line is drawn. On one block, blocking the notoriously inefficient street sweeper earns you a ticket. On the next, cars are parked on the sidewalk as we look the other way. It is hypocrisy to have laws and selectively enforce them, and it is lunacy to have no laws at all covering basic human habitation of living space. It’s time to begin moving toward a government of law, not variable political whim, and it is sad that we’ve waited this long to even start.

Local economy first

There is a “boilerplate” arsenal of economic development incentives, abatements and secret handshakes that seldom if ever apply to small, local, independent business operators, builders and developers, who have been the engine of growth in New Albany at a time when old-line companies like Pillsbury are departing, and the existence of River Ridge in Clark County is making it harder to replace them. As mayor, I will put New Albany first by nurturing grassroots economic development initiatives, and spreading risks and rewards, because I believe that economic development begins right here at home, with the empowerment of our own people and a level playing field for independent local businesses.

Locally-owned businesses activity encourage recirculation and a multiplier effect, wherein more money spent locally stays in the local economy, and for a longer period. I think we can position ourselves to thrive in the changing regional economy by exploiting market niches, but it will require thinking outside self-imposed boxes, and investing in economic development by fundamentally improving our infrastructure, not building plaque-ready water parks and pandering. It’s about priorities, after all.

Democracy & social justice

Human rights are a non-negotiable mandate, whether Dan Coffey thinks so or not. Respect for human rights and freedoms, democratic principles and social justice must start with the city’s employees and appointees, who must be accountable to the very highest standards in protecting and defending the civil rights of every person in this city. City Hall also must do what it can to be cognizant of institutional racism, discrimination, poverty, income inequality, homelessness and other social issues. We cannot pretend these problems don’t exist here, and I will not pretend to have all the answers. What I can promise to do is listen long and hard, and act on what I hear. It’s about starting a dialogue, and since the two major political parties have refrained from doing so, an independent mayor will get it done.

Two way streets NOW

Gahan’s bizarre fear and timidity aside, the arguments have been made, the overwhelming fact-based evidence presented, and the case effectively closed. There is no reason whatever not to implement the Speck downtown street network proposal in its entirety at the first opportunity, toward which purpose the use of TIF bonds actually would be a fitting and proper exercise, as two-way streets would increase safety, decrease crime, and directly assist in the revitalization and quality of life of a downtown area of approximately 120 square blocks, while not impeding reasonable use of these streets by commercial vehicles.

Once Speck’s directives have been accomplished, we can begin harnessing the same principles to the corridors within the beltway, as incorporating the city’s original suburbs off State Street, Grant Line Road and Charlestown Road. I’m often asked whether I “care” as much about Klerner Lane (as a random example) as downtown. I do. Know that my business meal ticket remains a pizzeria and brewery on Plaza Drive on the north side, and that our development patterns in these areas do not preclude connectivity elsewhere.

Thanks for your support,

R

Friday, August 14, 2015

ON THE AVENUES: It’s time to purge two-party politics and tie the community together.

ON THE AVENUES: It’s time to purge two-party politics and tie the community together.

A weekly web column by Roger A. Baylor.

I’m running for mayor of New Albany as an independent candidate in order to provide voters with a choice.

It’s as simple as that.

It is my core conviction that locally, we have a two-party system standing for very little in terms of coherent platform principle, apart from doing whatever is necessary to preserve its shared monopoly of power.

Republicans have the county, Democrats the city, and while professing an inability to speak on behalf of Republicans by virtue of not being one, I can truthfully say that as a lifelong left leaner who is liberal, progressive and entirely unembarrassed about it, the upper echelons of the Floyd County Democratic Party have become completely unglued. They may say things vaguely in keeping with their professed affiliation, but actions (and inactions) always speak louder than mere words.

It took them three months to comprehend and approve a street piano. ‘Nuff said, except there is far, far more.

Again and again during Jeff Gahan’s term, I’ve waited for this self-described Democrat to do something remotely democratic, to illustrate an open and public understanding of his party’s core concepts as they pertain to the legacy of leaders like Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Lyndon Baines Johnson, of the New Deal, and the Great Society, and to pay them more than periodic lip service.

But Gahan has been a profound, crushing disappointment, seemingly viewing himself first and foremost as a celebrity, a concert promoter and a theme park operator, perhaps an amalgam of Elvis, PT Barnum and Walt Disney, seeking to buy affection by incessantly pointing to the many nice things he’s purchased on credit, to be paid by the grandchildren of his current fans.

Sound bites and catch phrases always are substituted for substance. Surrounded by a closely knit group of self-interested handlers, Gahan babbles about the “business of residency,” “ripple effects,” and “where you should be,” showing nary a hint that he comprehends to any appreciable degree the ongoing, degraded condition of large tracts of urban space comprising his imagined Magic Kingdom.

Obviously Gahan venerates Louisville’s mayor, Greg Fischer, whose shameless glorification of crony capitalism and corporate welfare handouts rival those of Ronald Reagan. If it’s not big and expensive enough to warrant a self-congratulatory plaque, it’s not worthy of a moment’s consideration. At least Fischer has the panache to play a rock star on television.

Meanwhile, Gahan fancies himself a Democrat.

What has he done to address the first fundamental need, as opposed to his laundry list of TIF-bond-funded wants?

What has Gahan’s City Hall done for the people in New Albany who need help the most?

Has Gahan exhibited the slightest indication that he knows these people even exist, apart from offering them bread and circuses?

It would not surprise me at all for a Republican to govern in this fashion, and therein lies a basic truth: Gahan has behaved in so thoroughly a Republican way that if you are a Democrat, and genuinely believe in the principles espoused by the Democratic Party nationwide, then the only candidate in this race who can be relied upon to govern as a Democrat, democratically, is the Independent.

That would be me, and to repeat, I’m running for mayor of New Albany as an independent candidate in order to provide voters with a choice. Otherwise, we have none … especially if you’re a Democrat.

As a city, we cannot afford four more years of Jeff Gahan, but the rot is considerably deeper than fiscal, and those tens of millions of dollars in bonded debt he has accumulated during his sole term.

From the inception of this blog in 2004 to the present day, the Democratic Party machine has remained pre-eminent, with Gahan himself burrowed deeply within the apparatus, and yet almost everything positive accomplished during this time has come in spite of the party machine, not because of it. It is exhausting to wrestle progress from the cold, dead hands of big fish in small ponds, and yet each step of the way, it’s been the default mechanism in New Albany.

Many of us are sick of this, and it must change.

I truly believe there are alternatives to the same tired civic rituals, practiced by the usual underachieving political suspects, and which come down to three priorities. If aggressively implemented, I contend they can tie this community together and help New Albany achieve its potential.

Transparency
Infrastructure
Empowerment

Last week I promised to elaborate on ten “bullet point” Baylor for Mayor platform planks, but after much thought, I’ve decided to stop at seven. They’re inter-related, which points to something else of importance: When government acts, it should try whenever possible to multi-task and connect its actions and aims to best achieve multiple positive results. Doing so is the best use of money and time, and it doesn’t take a business person to know it. You do it in your own homes and workplaces.

City Hall can do it, too.

Honesty in government
This is job one. Jeff Gahan’s City Hall has been the least transparent in recent memory, and the consequences have been crippling. Daily information has been safeguarded like crown jewels, and far too many decisions have been taken by appointed boards, rather than elected officials. Public input has been rendered inert, either by calculated infrequency (the aquatic center and accompanying $20 million parks bond, and the Coyle site giveaway) or sheer organizational ineptitude (the three Speck meetings). It does not help that public meetings (Board of Works, Redevelopment) dealing with important decisions are held at inconvenient times for working people, and that we do not harness widely available electronic mediums to film and disseminate them.

Consequently, in the interests of greater transparency, I’ll dedicate the necessary resources to ensure robust two-way communications and conversations between the city and its citizens. My aim is equal governance and a level playing field, and so I will promote transparency every single day at City Hall, not every now and then. Finally, I will commence a deep cleansing of management level personnel in City Hall. New thinking is needed to stimulate the “same old, same old” management culture, which is in-bred and unresponsive. We’ll take applications, interview candidates, and find new talent, because our city employees already work hard. They need bosses who work smart.

Budget sanity
I support a sane, sustainable budget, something that is not currently being provided by Democrats, and which is not to be considered an exclusive province of the GOP. I will not sacrifice long-term budgetary sustainability for short-term glitz and glitter. On the one hand, Gahan’s astronomical bonded debt will be with us for decades to come, placing an ever greater strain on his illusory budgets. On the other, a Zurschmiede administration’s budgetary model would be that of Republicans in Floyd County government: Starvation rations, bread made from sawdust and the occasional corn husk. Disneyland versus North Korea? These are not the only two choices. It’s going to take an independent candidate like me to find truth between the extremes – and I will, because our real infrastructure needs will require investment.

Fix infrastructure
Maintaining the city’s public infrastructure and effectively utilizing our physical assets isn’t sexy. It’s essential, and it’s also about every single day, not every now and then. Like much of America, New Albany has neglected these fundamental needs, and yet they are the conditions that matter most right where you live. Everything else we do as a city extends from strong fundamental physical infrastructure: Streets, sidewalks, sewers, storm water and many more similar functions, big and small. These tasks comprise the city’s bones and blood.

Two-way streets are the perfect illustration: Speck them to spec, and watch as street design and expanded walkability support and enhance other measures already aimed at bolstering neighborhood revitalization, property values and independent business success – rather than actively work against them in a cloud of semi-trailer fumes and vehicular speed. It is my contention that quality of life cannot be imposed from the top down, but must rise from the grassroots up. Without better infrastructure management, this is not possible. We’ll analyze these areas from the ground up, and plan for success by design – every day, not every now and then.

Ordinance enforcement
Equal governance and level playing fields cannot be attained without consistent and principled ordinance enforcement, as applied professionally and separated from petty politics. To cite just one example, the city of New Albany still does not have a rental property registration and inspection program in the year 2015.

Here is another: Parking ordinances are enforced in some places and not others – and no one knows where the non-enforcement line is drawn. On one block, blocking the notoriously inefficient street sweeper earns you a ticket. On the next, cars are parked on the sidewalk as we look the other way. It is hypocrisy to have laws and selectively enforce them, and it is lunacy to have no laws at all covering basic human habitation of living space. It’s time to begin moving toward a government of law, not variable political whim, and it is sad that we’ve waited this long to even start.

Local economy first
There is a “boilerplate” arsenal of economic development incentives, abatements and secret handshakes that seldom if ever apply to small, local, independent business operators, builders and developers, who have been the engine of growth in New Albany at a time when old-line companies like Pillsbury are departing, and the existence of River Ridge in Clark County is making it harder to replace them. As mayor, I will put New Albany first by nurturing grassroots economic development initiatives, and spreading risks and rewards, because I believe that economic development begins right here at home, with the empowerment of our own people and a level playing field for independent local businesses.

Locally-owned businesses activity encourage recirculation and a multiplier effect, wherein more money spent locally stays in the local economy, and for a longer period. I think we can position ourselves to thrive in the changing regional economy by exploiting market niches, but it will require thinking outside self-imposed boxes, and investing in economic development by fundamentally improving our infrastructure, not building plaque-ready water parks and pandering. It’s about priorities, after all.

Democracy & social justice
Human rights are a non-negotiable mandate, whether Dan Coffey thinks so or not. Respect for human rights and freedoms, democratic principles and social justice must start with the city’s employees and appointees, who must be accountable to the very highest standards in protecting and defending the civil rights of every person in this city. City Hall also must do what it can to be cognizant of institutional racism, discrimination, poverty, income inequality, homelessness and other social issues. We cannot pretend these problems don’t exist here, and I will not pretend to have all the answers. What I can promise to do is listen long and hard, and act on what I hear. It’s about starting a dialogue, and since the two major political parties have refrained from doing so, an independent mayor will get it done.

Two way streets NOW
Gahan’s bizarre fear and timidity aside, the arguments have been made, the overwhelming fact-based evidence presented, and the case effectively closed. There is no reason whatever not to implement the Speck downtown street network proposal in its entirety at the first opportunity, toward which purpose the use of TIF bonds actually would be a fitting and proper exercise, as two-way streets would increase safety, decrease crime, and directly assist in the revitalization and quality of life of a downtown area of approximately 120 square blocks, while not impeding reasonable use of these streets by commercial vehicles.

Once Speck’s directives have been accomplished, we can begin harnessing the same principles to the corridors within the beltway, as incorporating the city’s original suburbs off State Street, Grant Line Road and Charlestown Road. I’m often asked whether I “care” as much about Klerner Lane (as a random example) as downtown. I do. Know that my business meal ticket remains a pizzeria and brewery on Plaza Drive on the north side, and that our development patterns in these areas do not preclude connectivity elsewhere.

---

This is enough for the moment, but there is so much more:


  • The importance of community oriented policing.
  • Infill housing to remediate intemperate demolition.
  • Public art.
  • Recognition of placemaking and urban design principles.
  • Hiring a full-time grant writer to help fund projects.
  • Internet connectivity as an aspect of vital infrastructure for people.
  • The importance of historic preservation.
  • Trees, shade and green thinking.


Transparency means that we’ll be having a constant conversation about the city.

Infrastructure is the fundamental propriety for things.

Empowerment is the basic prerequisite for people.

These themes are the ties that bind, and precisely because they’ve been undervalued by the two-party system, they’re ripe for improvement. It's true that as an independent mayor, I'll have no political party structure at my back, but surely this is liberating, not constraining. We'll work with those willing to work, of all political party affiliations, or none.

Thanks for reading, and your support is appreciated.

---

Recent columns:

August 10: ON THE AVENUES SPECIAL EDITION: When it comes to the RCI, can the RDA opt out of the RFRA?

August 6: ON THE AVENUES: Money is the ultimate bully.

July 30: ON THE AVENUES: Homegrown New Albany, but not in a good way.

July 23: ON THE AVENUES: A citizen's eloquent complaint about the parking debacle at River Run reminds us that planners and brooms go hand in hand.

July 16: ON THE AVENUES: Louisville Beer, then and now ... and cheers to Rotary.

July 9: ON THE AVENUES: A mayoral petition as prologue to history.