Showing posts with label rare New Albanian civic concepts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rare New Albanian civic concepts. Show all posts

Thursday, February 11, 2016

ON THE AVENUES: James Fallows, New Albany, and the primacy of bricks over string music.

ON THE AVENUES: James Fallows, New Albany, and the primacy of bricks over string music. 

A weekly web column by Roger A. Baylor.

Yes, I'm happy the New Albany Bulldogs are doing so well, and I agree, it’s just horrible what happened to Louisville’s college basketball team.

Damn that Ramsey.

But what is the city of New Albany’s shooting percentage when it comes to predictors of civic success? Let’s return to an article by James Fallows in The Atlantic: Eleven Signs a City Will Succeed.

This article appears in the March print edition alongside the cover story, “Can America Put Itself Back Together?”—a summation of James and Deb Fallows’s 54,000-mile journey around America in a single-engine plane.

By the time we had been to half a dozen cities, we had developed an informal checklist of the traits that distinguished a place where things seemed to work. These items are obviously different in nature, most of them are subjective, and some of them overlap.

But if you tell us how a town measures up based on these standards, we can guess a lot of other things about it. In our experiences, these things were true of the cities, large or small, that were working best.

I’ve lifted Fallows’ eleven success points verbatim (in bold), followed by excerpts of his explanatory comments (italicized), and then my own thoughts. Please consider reading Fallows’ article in its entirety to get a better idea of his larger perspective.

I’ll be shooting from the hip, with my immediate reactions sans labored edits. There’ll be things I miss, so let me know about them.

1. Divisive national politics seem a distant concern.

“Overwhelmingly the focus in successful towns was not on national divisions but on practical problems that a community could address.”

That’s an air ball. Less than 30% of New Albany’s registered voters participated in the 2015 municipal election, and whether left or right of the aisle, conversations (especially on social media) tend to be about national and state issues, not local. Days are spent on The Donald, and nanoseconds on the street outside.

I readily concede that since my own focus tends to be toward fully addressable local community-driven issues, I may be jaundiced, verging on embittered, at the persistent lack of responsiveness. Still, apart from me, the evidence points to local issues being of concern only to a minority.

2. You can pick out the local patriots.

“A standard question we’d ask soon after arrival was ‘Who makes this town go?’ The answers varied widely … (but) the more quickly it was provided, the better shape the town was in.”

I’m sure the sitting mayor has a strong take on this one, especially as he’s replicated his image thousands of times during the course of Ceausescu-scale propaganda, but Jeff Gahan’s incessant self-aggrandizement is rather eloquently contradicted by New Albany’s ongoing absence of meaningful electoral participation.

This is not to deny the existence of local patriots. They exist, usually under the radar, and yet there seems to be little interest in the topic amid yawns. We're looking forward to March Madness, though.

3. “Public-private partnerships” are real.

“The more specifically a community can explain what their public-private partnerships mean, the better off the city is.”

If indeed there exists any such animal in New Albany, evidence is scant, and the best known recent example would be the deal struck by City Hall with Flaherty and Collins, wherein the city is subsidizing the cost of constructing apartments at the former site of the Coyle automotive empire.

Is this an example of a “real” public-private partnership, or is it crony capitalism at its finest? Perhaps more importantly, has New Albany even countenanced a civic discussion of the question? If so, would anyone care?

Miss.

4. People know the civic story.

“As with guiding national myths, the question is not whether these assessments seem precisely accurate to outsiders. Their value is in giving citizens a sense of how today’s efforts are connected to what happened yesterday and what they hope for tomorrow.”

A shaky maybe, perhaps half credit. Seriously, is there a shared sense of what New Albany is about – apart from high school sports? Certainly there are plenty of inhabitants, independent business owners and even the stray politician capable of voicing an opinion. Historic preservationists have their point. So do slumlords. Is there any sense of a place where they meet? If so, I haven’t seen much of it.

5. They have a downtown.

"But downtown ambitions of any sort are a positive sign, and second- and third-floor apartments and condos over restaurants and stores with lights on at night suggest that the downtown has crossed a decisive threshold and will survive."

Yes, we do, thanks primarily to the unidentified local patriots, untold small business investors, and a few unsung urban pioneers. It’s unfinished and fragile, but it’s there, generally owing nothing to the self-identified patriots who claim credit for unrealized potential.

6. They are near a research university.

“Research universities have become the modern counterparts to a natural harbor or a river confluence.”

In the context Fallows intends – examples like Clemson or UC-Davis – then no, not really. At the same time, in addition to IU Southeast and Purdue Polytechnic there are numerous institutions of higher learning near New Albany, in Louisville, Lexington, Bloomington and Indianapolis. The trick is viewing them for what they really are (schools) and what they shouldn’t be (athletic feeder programs).

7. They have, and care about, a community college.

“The more often and more specifically we heard people talk about their community college, the better we ended up feeling about the direction of that town.”

Echoing the preceding, no … and still yes. Perhaps not a community college according to Fallows, but Ivy Tech, just up Charlestown Road near Sellersburg. As our friend Mark has observed, it’s also one thing to have, and something different to care. When sewer tap-in waivers go to a for-profit corporation and not IU Southeast’s student housing, it says something.

The wrong something. I'll count it anyway.

8. They have unusual schools.

“Early in our stay, we would ask what was the most distinctive school to visit at the K–12 level. If four or five answers came quickly to mind, that was a good sign … the common theme was intensity of experimentation.”

The theater department at NAHS is incredible.

I happily defer to readers in tipping this consideration one way or the other. All I see is a school corporation eager to demolish housing stock and to build brand new bright shiny objects, although I’m open to persuasion and may well be missing details.

9. They make themselves open.

“The anti-immigrant passion that has inflamed this election cycle was not something people expressed in most of the cities we visited … every small town in America has thought about how to offset the natural brain drain that has historically sent its brightest young people elsewhere. The same emphasis on inclusion that makes a town attractive to talented outsiders increases its draw to its own natives.”

Judging (perhaps incorrectly) from social media alone, New Albany possesses the same percentage of xenophobes as most American communities of its size. Conversely, public episodes of intemperance and derangement have been few  in number.

Key to Fallows’ explanation is an acknowledged existence of a natural brain drain. I suspect that too few in New Albany understand what this implies. If they did, there might be a sharper delineation of openness as it pertains to us -- good, bad or indifferent. Small business investors aside, can we really say this is an “open” community?

10. They have big plans.

“When a mayor or city-council member shows me a map of how new downtown residences will look when completed, or where the new greenway will go, I think: ‘I’d like to come back.’ Cities still make plans, because they can do things.”

Insofar as New Albanian elected government officials are concerned, yes. They do have plans. Often their plans are mistaken, injurious, overly expensive, or all three. They’re still big plans, nonetheless, and yet again, one must ask: Are these plans part and parcel of a shared public discourse?

No. They're just big.

11. They have craft breweries.

“One final marker, perhaps the most reliable: A city on the way back will have one or more craft breweries, and probably some small distilleries too.”

Perhaps this is the only unqualified “yes” of the eleven. We have three breweries, a winery, and Indiana law has mutated to become more favorable to a future distillery. At least I can claim partial credit for something positive -- right, Jeff?

---

Overall, my score for New Albany is 4.5 out of 11, a shooting percentage of around 40%.

If there is a commonality linking Fallows’ indicators, it seems to be a sense of affirmative replies deriving from a broad base of the community; of course the teachers know which schools are special, but do the rest of us?

In turn, this suggests an amorphous and indefinable notion of pride.

In those European places I’ve spent the most time – Bamberg, Prague, Plymouth, Copenhagen – virtually everyone I met knew their civic story. I’d be speaking to them from the vantage point of a vibrant downtown. It would have surprised me if any of these people (whether speaking to me in English or through a friendly interpreter) would have failed to grasp the value of education.

True, the openness vs. immigration argument is a hot button today, and not so much then, and naturally, my sampling has been small.

Does New Albany have an identity, and are we capable of pride?

I’m proud of what the food and drink sector has achieved, and at the same time, I know that this cannot be the whole of economic development.

I’m proud of Steve Resch, Matt Chalfant and others like them, and I’m completely disgusted that the inbred local ruling class can’t seem to avoid looking elsewhere for inspiration.

I’m proud and troubled, all at once. It would be wonderful to put a check mark by all eleven of these indicators. It would be even better to know there’s a path toward being able to do so in the future.

Is it possible?

---

Recent columns:

February 8: ON THE AVENUES EXTRA: "No, John Rosenbarger, congestion is our friend. Help us achieve it, or get out of the way."

February 4: ON THE AVENUES: Hello, I must be going.

January 28: ON THE AVENUES: They're surely not ROLL models.

January 21: ON THE AVENUES: When I grow up, I'd like to be alive.

January 14: ON THE AVENUES: Should the Queen fail to rescue us, there's always H. L. Mencken.

Thursday Must Read Part 2: "Eleven signs a city will succeed" -- how does New Albany's score?

I'm happy the Bulldogs are doing so well, but these are the points that matter to the greatest number of people in terms of their lives, apart from games.

How does New Albany score?

I've snipped to the root, but go read the article, and comment here or at Facebook. I'm seeing three, maybe four.

Eleven Signs a City Will Succeed, by James Fallows (The Atlantic)

This article appears in the March print edition alongside the cover story, “Can America Put Itself Back Together?”—a summation of James and Deb Fallows’s 54,000-mile journey around America in a single-engine plane ...

By the time we had been to half a dozen cities, we had developed an informal checklist of the traits that distinguished a place where things seemed to work. These items are obviously different in nature, most of them are subjective, and some of them overlap. But if you tell us how a town measures up based on these standards, we can guess a lot of other things about it. In our experiences, these things were true of the cities, large or small, that were working best:

1. Divisive national politics seem a distant concern.
2. You can pick out the local patriots.
3. “Public-private partnerships” are real.
4. People know the civic story.
5. They have a downtown.
6. They are near a research university.
7. They have, and care about, a community college.
8. They have unusual schools.
9. They make themselves open.
10. They have big plans.
11. They have craft breweries.

Thursday, October 30, 2014

ON THE AVENUES: Does New Albany even have an intellectual history?

ON THE AVENUES: Does New Albany even have an intellectual history?

A weekly web column by Roger A. Baylor.

The last time I can recall dressing up for Halloween was in 1986.

It was the year after my first trip to the Soviet Union, where I’d bought a top quality ushanka (a furry cap with ear flaps) for $25 at a hard currency shop in Leningrad.

As a regular customer of the old Sam’s Tavern, as opposed to the newer generation “Food & Spirits” moniker, my curiosity was piqued by a Halloween costume contest at the bar, but why waste precious drinking time on creative wardrobe when a pair of work boots and the ushanka perched atop my head announced my participation as a Bolshevik?

Shrug. It was good for second place.

After all, on yet another pagan-sourced holiday excuse to flaunt base capitalist greed and excess, one ostensibly devoted to ghosts and ghouls, my posing as a communist bogeyman seemed perfectly fitting. Joe Stalin was a failed seminary student, and his paranoiac, murderous police state has come to exemplify fear, loathing and the “reality” of Marxism as quasi-religious doctrine.

However, as the late historian Tony Judt and his co-writer Timothy Snyder point out in their 2012 book, Thinking the Twentieth Century, at least Marxism-cum-communism remains an actual doctrine, or system of thought and ideas. It’s more than can be said about fascism during its 20th century heyday, because there were no intellectual underpinnings of fascism, which in essence was (and remains) a cult of pure, unadulterated power.

Power. Not unlike a Mitch McConnell television ad, as financed by far-off political money aggregators. Our contemporary capitalist American era, a time dominated by the likes of fracking, the Koch brothers and Wal-Mart, bears a good deal more similarity to fascism than communism, the imagined excesses of managed health care and locale of Barack Obama’s birth certificate notwithstanding.

It’s why my brewing machines are calibrated to “kill” fascists, not communists. I’m for capitalism with a human face, although I’m afraid it may be too late for that.

---

There’ll be an election next week.

Why do ordinary Americans insist on vote against their own best interests by casting their ballots for Republicans? Why do they support the crippled and unresponsive “two party system” by voting at all? As the 1% garners an ever higher share of the wealth, what keeps 99% of Americans off the streets, demanding change?

Inelegantly paraphrased, Judt offers a theory from self-delusion to explain this phenomenon.

Democracy depends on an informed and responsive citizenry, but generations of consumer-oriented, materialistic capitalism have resulted in large numbers of humans existing in a state of non-responsiveness, unable to act in their own best interests, primarily because they remain besotted, dazzled and duped by the convenient myth of America as a place of opportunity, where any lowly schmuck can get rich by working hard.

In much the same way as science contradicts religious superstition, incontrovertible economic statistics plainly disprove the notion that most of us have any chance whatever of becoming a card-carrying member of the 1%. We’ll be lucky if we die out of debt.

But superstition perseveres, and according to Judt, Americans insist on voting to maintain the conditions of their own impoverishment precisely because they retain the childlike faith that some sweet day, when they’re finally as rich as Mitt Romney, they’ll receive the rewards for voting like Mitt Romney, even when they were poor.

And then there is white male anger, which is a topic for another day.

---

Judt’s and Snyder’s book takes the form of several loosely themed conversations, as transcribed by Snyder. At the time of the book’s preparation, Judt was immobilized by ALS, the disease that subsequently killed him. As with Stephen Hawking, Judt’s mind was mightily sharp, and the two historians tackle topics beneath an umbrella term many New Albanians might find frightening, pretentious or both: The “intellectual history” of the past century.

In short, how did ideas and systems of thought play a role in European society, art, politics and history during this era? I’ve already mentioned some ‘isms,” as in capitalism, communism and fascism. What about socialism? How is it that I persist in identifying my core political persuasion as resembling European-style Social Democracy rather than conforming to an American version of Democrat or Republican?

There are numerous other examples, as in the case of Zionism. What is the pathway of a Jewish separatist movement rooted in fin de siècle Vienna, as it leads toward a post-Holocaust consolidation of the modern Israeli state? How did rural and urban Jewish societies in Europe differ in the first place? And so on.

Reading and thinking about this wonderful overview of intellectual history have been tremendously exciting for me. I needed a stimulating “break” after so many months of concentration on specific matters of local, personal and business interest – from lane widths to commercial kitchens, from the death of a housecat to Silvercrest, and from 800-lb gorillas to shrubbery.

Judt and Snyder’s engaging scholarship has helped bring me back, full circle, to the time when I was advised to register for an Introduction to Philosophy class only because (a) it’s easy, and (b) I’d need humanities credits, anyway. But I was abruptly awakened by a vibrant world of thoughts and ideas, which high school simply didn’t prepare me to fathom or discover. The book reminds me of what changed my life so very long ago ... and continues to do so today.

Yes, I persist in a belief that certain of these ideas and doctrines, some more so than others, still preface daily living in a place like New Albany. Ideas and words matter, as in a comment recently passed along to me:

"Before we talk about transportation we have to ask what city we want and how we want to live."

I want to live thinking.

Without it, my quality of life suffers.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

The NewAlbanist on tactics of self-selection and self-rejection.


Fresh off his star turn as "Soapy Sam" Ballard in "Rumpole and the Big Henry Bain Sauce and Egg Man" ... just kidding.

It's been wonderful to experience the bookseller's erudition of late. I keep company with the finest expository writers in town (Randy and Jeff), and reading them enriches me. I'd say it makes me a better writer, except only sobriety can do that -- and what a price.

The bookseller defines his term:

Today’s word from Ben Schott’s Schottenfreude: German Words for the Human Condition

Bösewichtsduckmäusrigkeit – Cowardice in the face of malevolence.

Pronounced [boo-ze-vicchts --dook-moyz-rihg-kite]

Then he moves to The NewAlbanist for the details.

Bösewichtsduckmäusrigkeit It Ain’t
Bösewichtsduckmäusrigkeit It Ain’t, Part 2

We had a few discussions over the weekend with regard to an earlier post, one in which I lamented the seeming withdrawal of one and the patent abdication of many others when it comes to seeking elective office.

I am reminded that such decision do not take place in a vacuum. The vapidity of New Albany government is the product of both self-selection and self-rejection.

There are two primary tactics practiced by incumbents.

As an oblique comment on the general theme of civic engagement, there's an anecdote I enjoy repeating which goes something like this.

I'll be discussing New Albanian social conditions and trends, conceding that (of course) the best and brightest always leave town to seek opportunities elsewhere, and usually someone will squint and reply, "I see you're still here."

Yes, so true -- but why further encourage the brain drain by being elected?

Sunday, November 17, 2013

The NewAlbanist: "And Then There Were … None?"

Admittedly, it struck me as a bit premature that Brad Bell announced his candidacy for the 2015 council race some 20 months before the primary.

In addition, there's a "once bitten, twice shy" hangover from my erstwhile newspaper column's shoddy treatment (post-primary, 2011) at the hands of the Blind Goys from Alabama.

It's also true that no one's running for anything until there's the correct election to contest. Verily, at this precise moment, I'm not running for office, although if you're interested in examining the platform from my council race in 2011, the Facebook campaign page remains up.

Clear as mud? Now, here's what the bookseller (NewAlbanist) has to say, and as always, it's quite thought-provoking. Now if you'll excuse me, there are tea leaves to be read.

And Then There Were … None?

by newalbanist
At their next family reunion, if not sooner, Jeff Gahan, New Albany’s mayor, and Dan Coffey, the city’s longest-tenured city council member, will surely share a satisfied chuckle over their cooling baked beans and warming potato salad. For yet another talented and innovative New Albanian has thrown in the towel and conceded the electoral field to the reigning cabal.
My friend, Roger Baylor, seems to have literally done that. In the midst of a renewed effort on his part to simply help improve our city, Roger has been compelled to issue a caveat in conjunction with that effort – “I’m not running for office.” More on this, below.

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

"'Rules' are laws, ordinances, and regulations that can strengthen your community."

The New Rules Project's goal is "Designing Rules As If Community Matters." Now that's just the sort of subversive concept for CeeSaw and his ilk to ignore.

The Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) proposes a set of new rules that builds community by supporting humanly scaled politics and economics. The rules call for:
  • Decisions made by those impacted
  • Communities accepting responsibility for the welfare of their members and the next generation
  • Households and communities possessing or owning sufficient productive capacity to generate real wealth
NewRules.org discusses the importance of rules and catalogs the best.  We make the rules and the rules make us. More