A note I sent to some council members today, asking for some rational, bicentennial intervention on behalf of a very left out, largely confused public:
A brief review of funding so far:
Bicentennial Book:
$144,000 (Started with a "loan" from redevelopment. Does anyone know how much?)
Park:
$165,000 purchase price (grossly overpaid)
$50,0000 design (overpaid again)
$520,000 for construction (no one seems to know why such a small park is so expensive)
Other:
$43,000 (earmarked for DNA and Bicentennial out of $100,000 transfer to Board of Public Works)
That puts the City on the hook for between $778,000 and $922,000 already, depending on the amount of the book loan, with little to no oversight. Now they're asking for $85,000 more. That's all in addition to the $275,000 they've received from Horseshoe among other private donations. The total known expenditure so far is about $1.2 million even before tonight's request. I've seen far lesser amounts lead to significant council debates but this money, for some reason, seems to be flowing without much question or understanding of its use.
Beyond the wildly overpriced park, why is the public being asked to fund what are essentially private parties with cover charges that will preclude much of the population from participating? It's one thing to help fund a small number of free-to-the-public events but why should everyone have to pay for lavish, ticketed events that those throwing them should be able to afford on their own?
Please consider turning down the funding request tonight, at the very least for those events which intend to charge for admission even after receiving public subsidy.
Thanks.