Deep Gahan State ally Greg Phipps will seek re-election as 3rd district council person.

I was hoping we might have a progressive candidate for once.

Adam polishes Jeffrey's personality cult, and yet Dickey's Floyd County Democratic Party still hasn't embraced Gahan's public housing putsch.

Adam Dickey's a chairman on fire.

Recently at the Facebook page of the Floyd County Democratic Party, he's touted the party's local savior Jeff Gahan on four occasions (displayed like dainty meat counter offal below).

And yet Adam keeps forgetting to openly praise his Dear Leader's public housing putsch package.

ON THE AVENUES: Using Deaf Gahan’s dullest razor, we race straight to the bottom of his hurried NAHA putsch launch.

The party's in favor, right? I mean, not a single elected Democrat has openly questioned the land grab, and surely this is a policy deriving from the chairman's iron grip?

If local Democrats can't honestly address Jeff Gahan's public housing putsch, how can they "resist" Trump?

With so many local Democratic "leaders" self-identifying as geniuses, we must conclude that their current consumptive hypocrisy is a choice, not an accident.

It's #OurNA, all right: "New Albany attempting to purge itself of the poor" ... so, are local Democrats finally catching on to the Gahan shell game?

Shouldn't Adam and his party apparatus just step up and be honest ... for once?

I'd gently remind them of the prevailing dissonance, but unfortunately, Adam still bans me from social media dialogue. Apparently he's no more interested in free speech than forthright public disclosures of socio-economic engineering.

Consequently, it's our job not to forget.

#TheResistance20152019

Time for a pro-choice spine check, local "Let's Pretend We're Democrats."

Nationally, the question is this: To what extent will Democrats contradict themselves and gut their principles to win back the House?

Locally, it's phrased this way: To what extent will Democrats contradict themselves and gut their principles to keep Jeff Gahan in the mayor's office?

Damn -- the hypocrisy meter's flashing "TILT," and I'm fresh out of Adamite Sickness Bags.

No 'litmus test' on abortion? Shame on Democrats backing anti-choice candidates, by Jamie Peck (The Guardian)

While Hillary Clinton stood firm on the issue during her 2016 election campaign, she also said that ‘of course’ you could be anti-abortion and a feminist

As Donald Trump and his cast of flatterers continue their incompetent war on the American people, the Democrats seem more determined than ever to bungle their comeback from 2016’s humiliating defeat.

From small-thinking policy proposals (as outlined in Chuck Schumer’s New York Times editorial last week) and slogans that read like satire (“I mean, have you seen the other guys?”) to their quixotic obsession with wooing “moderate” Republicans and the rich to the detriment of progressives and the poor, their strategy is, at best, a wet fart. At worst, it’s a plan to sell out everything they once stood for.

The latest principle to be jettisoned like so much dead weight, or at least the latest one people are talking about: a woman’s right to choose.