Tuesday, July 19, 2011

UEA's market study the subject of three-part OSIN series.

Daniel Suddeath's three-part OSIN newspaper series examining the Urban Enterprise Association's 2010 retail site assessment survey, and its context within the city's overall economic prospects, concludes today. Links are provided below. The UEA's market study by the Buxton firm was first suggested during my tenure on the organization's board, and unlike certain other viewpoints, it falls squarely within the UEA's stated mandate.

MISSION: The mission of the NAUEA is to improve the physical, business, residential and socioeconomic environment of the New Albany Urban Enterprise Zone through collaborative, public-private initiatives that stimulate private investment in real and personal property.

This creates a continuum of jobs, including “living wage” jobs; and provides a supportive atmosphere for employers, employees and zone residents alike.

In all its endeavors, the NAUEA shall strive for the common good and reciprocity among its many stakeholders.
As most readers should know, I no longer serve on the UEA's board, but then, as now, my primary personal interest in this topic has to do with expanding opportunities for independent, local and small businesses, which have proven their resilience, especially the ones located New Albany's revitalizing downtown during the past few recessionary years.

When the market study idea first surfaced, my questions were appropriately narrow. Would such a study be used as chain bait alone? Would we be looking for the Qdobas and Bed & Bath & Whatevers that form the basis for the endless, soulless exurb (see: Veteran’s Parkway?

In the end, I was satisfied with the answers proffered, to the effect that the results would take the form of a factual compendium with a broad range of potential uses.

Oddly, my reading of the second installment of Suddeath’s series seems to reveal that a strange, latent affection for a larger-box retail presence downtown among some of the district’s boosters has never really gone away. The chosen euphemism for these trial balloons would seem to be the words “large” or "larger." Speaking for myself, it would be informative to hear more about what is meant by “large” when the word is used in this way, and whether the speakers truly understand why a small businessman like myself fight - and whom.

To repeat something written here numerous times in the past: Downtown is a case for a strategy approximating that of branded destination marketing.

Downtown business will succeed to the extent that its businesses and its overall feeling represent the polar antithesis of the exurb. Small, independent, local and niche are the keys. Not only is such a strategy possible; it is practical, and it is proven in cities across the country. NA 1st, the city's first-ever grassroots small and independent business alliance, exists for precisely this mission, and not only in downtown.

1. Despite low economic segments, some say New Albany’s consumer base still strong

2.
Bringing business to New Albany: Study shows city capturing more than its share of the market

3.
Next wave for New Albany: Officials: Education, housing and marketing must be focal points for city’s economic future

8 comments:

Jeff Gillenwater said...

Residency stats, Census Tract 704 (essentially Midtown), 2010:

Residents: 2,637

Total Housing Units: 1,458

Vacancy Rate: 17.1%

Number of Vacant Housing Units: 250

The neighborhood outlined provides easy walkability and bikeability to the Central Business District. Of course, the West End and other walkable/bikeable areas aren't calculated here so there are many more residents and preexisting housing units and vacancies in the mix.

And the main thing we should be doing is spending $12 million to subsidize new condos with a possibility of around 150 residents?

ian said...

Jeff,

I hope you're charging $25,000 for that analysis.

Jeff Gillenwater said...

I was thinking about getting the mayor's office to bully the UEA for the money, Josh. I mean, the gall of them using their funding to produce objective data like this. That sort of toxic activity might ruin my plan that nobody knows about.

ian said...

If you really want the money, stop using Census data from 2010 and try 1985 instead. That way everything will make sense. It is important to get data that will support policy.

Iamhoosier said...

That's what the city council tried to do with redistricting until a small group of citizens took 'em to court.

RememberCharlemagne said...

"Downtown business will succeed to the extent that its businesses and its overall feeling represent the polar antithesis of the exurb"

Downtown business will succeed when surrounding neighborhoods can support the necessary demand needed to support the old and/or new business. It doesn't matter if the business is local or national. Without the necessary neighborhood support structure New Albany's downtown will continually struggle to redevelop.

Mike Ladd's resent editorial indicates this point.

And Jeff's "17.1%" vacancy rates further alludes to a fundamental problem with our surrounding neighborhoods. Surrounding downtown neighborhoods are not offering the necessary products to attract the necessary residents that are needed to create the demand for businesses, jobs, and economic growth.

The private market is reluctant to invest into areas that qualify for CBDG funds, which means that the area has a greater than 55% poverty rate. These areas, which are downtown and the surrounding neighborhoods are failed neighborhoods. Our local government has spent millions over the past 3 yrs without any positive economic results.

Not until a fundamental change from local government to make direct investments, with the goal, to change the surrounding neighborhoods to and meet current demands necessary to attract the best and brightest residents will New Albany's troubled areas see lasting improvement.

The New Albanian said...

Apples and oranges, but yes.

ian said...
This comment has been removed by the author.