Wednesday, July 06, 2011

At long last, an oligarch's toady who is honest in his vituperation.

All the digging credit goes to Curt Morrison and his Louisville Courant blog for uncovering these delicious gems of wisdom from Spencer Coe, Vice President at Gohmann "We Fought the Guvmint, and the Guvmint Won" Asphalt, which of course stands to reap vast and mind-boggling profits from various components of the bridges boondoggle.

Indiana businesses boycotted by VP of crooked contractor

Spencer B. Coe, the Vice President of Gohmann Asphalt, through comments on a Business First poll on the Bridges Project, has launched a boycott against toll opponents. Specifically, he's named businesses like Buckhead's, Rocky's, Clark County Auto Auction, that he believes he can do without.
Here's a Coe defense of his kneejerk boycott notion, which appeared as a comment at Louisville Courant.

I stand by my position, those who support the ORBP should not support the businesses of those who do not. I can choose where to spend my money and it will not be with businesses that actively oppose investment in the future of our region, I suggest the same for all ORBP supporters.
In the same comment thread, NA Confidential's Jeff Gillenwater answered.

If that's how Coe wants to play, then play.

What that means, of course, is that an overwhelming majority of people in the region would not do business with Gohmann Asphalt, including hundreds of area businesses and all the local governments who have issued statements, signed petitions, and/or passed resolutions against current ORBP plans.

Gohmann competes for local contracts worth hundreds of thousands in New Albany alone. Removing them from the bid list, though, is no problem if that's how their VP wants to handle it.
In an earlier comment at Facebook, Coe widened the geographic scope to include our own charming New Albany.

Please someone tell me how this will adversely affect Southern Indiana? Smooth flowing traffic on I 65 will adversely impact downtown New Albany and Grant Line Road businesses? The inability of some in Southern Indiana to see outside their "back yard" is frightening!
Impact? I'm glad he brought up that word, which has become a favorite of mine. I took a slightly softer approach in answering.

Spencer, what you might do is stand in my shoes for just a moment. As operator of a small independent retail business that does not derive governmental income for massive construction projects, but rather must convince diners/drinkers/shoppers to come to Indiana from Louisville to spend their discretionary income, I know how very hard it is to do just that. They don't have to come here; I must convince them. Charge them a fee to do it, and for many, game over. Until you and other toll proponents truly GET this reality, we'll continue being at odds.
Which reminds me, it is now 205 days since Jerry Finn of the Bridges Authority, in a conversation with me at the Muhammad Ali Center, conceded that no economic impact study on the effects of tolling on Southern Indiana small businesses had been done or even contemplated, but that he would henceforth urge such a study: Tolling Authority "input" session utterly without the redeeming presence of strong liquor.

Has he?

Have they?

Has anyone?

As for Spencer Coe, I'm sure he well understands the potential economic impact on Gohmann Asphalt if the company were to be frozen out of the bidding process for those huge infrastructure projects that constitute its bottom-line bread and butter. Alas, his boycott threat is hollow; Coe suggests "the same for all ORBP supporters," but since statistically, there are a few dozen such supporters at most scattered throughout the metro area, I'm not exactly set aquiver at the prospect of self-immolation on the Public House lawn.

Sadly and predictably, what Coe and other Ohio River Bridges Project proponents cannot seem to fathom, dazzled as they are by Ayn Rand's erotic attraction to steel, concrete, asphalt, and moreover, the velvety feel of crisp green slices paper pressed into one's hand in a One Southern Indiana conference room toilet stall, is that those of us down here in muddy bottom lands, rooting around for stray trickle-backs from the oligarchs, clearly see the economic impact of tolling because we live it, every single day.

We know that an economic impact study would amply illustrate tolling's obvious harm to small business in Southern Indiana, to our working commuters who must travel to Louisville and back, and to those Hoosiers least able to afford tolls, period.

At the same December meeting as my chat with Finn, David Nicklies wagged his finger at me and said that everyone must sacrifice to make possible the saving grace of the ORBP. What I asked him, and what I've continued to ask, is this: Why must residents of Southern Indiana sacrifice far more for less benefit?

It is a question that remains unanswered by Hoosier bridges fetishists, Spencer Coe now prominent among them.

14 comments:

Iamhoosier said...

I wonder if Mr. Coe is a big supporter of transit by rail? I mean, being such a big picture person and all.

Just a $1.00 toll would cost a Hoosier commuter to Louisville $500/year. Is Mr. Coe so out of touch that he thinks that wouldn't impact Southern Indiana. Every 1,000 commuters would equal 1/2 million dollars less to spend.

Jeff Gillenwater said...

Now multiply IAH's number by about 40-45 to get a fairly accurate picture of annual Southern Indiana commuter toll costs.

And then add the cost of tolls to the purchase price of anything in Southern Indiana for Louisvillians, including staples like groceries for people close to the downtown/river area who do a majority of their shopping on the Indiana side.

And then consider that other metro areas are able to offer monthly transit passes, mitigating the need for a car (payment, insurance, gas, maintenance, parking, tolls) to get back and forth to work, school, etc., for less than a hundred dollars a month.

And then multiply the difference in personal "mobility" costs between a tolled ORBP and transit by a significant percentage of those same commuters across twenty years or so.

And then consider that, according to KIPDA, we can build a regional mass transit system for less than the cost of just the downtown portion of ORBP, that is, an East End Bridge *and* mass transit for less than ORBP.

And then check Gohmann's web site to see why Coe doesn't care.

I'm in favor of boycotting willful, greed-induced ignorance.

Jeff Gillenwater said...

Oh, yeah...

And then consider that ORBP proponents have never offered a single, objective counter-argument to any of the above, except to say that mass transit won't work in this region because the people here are just too stupid to grasp what I typed above and that anyone who suggests that they aren't that stupid is "anti-progress", "negative", and/or "delusional".

Iamhoosier said...

Bravo, Jeff.

Jeff Gillenwater said...

For example:

“I ask you not to pay attention to those who would want you to believe that this project would have a negative impact,” he said. “I also ask that you not let the negativity of a few guide your decision on the [no tolls] resolution that you’re talking about tonight.” -- Bi-State Bridges Authority member
Jerry Finn to Clark County Commissioners
, November, 2010.

dan chandler said...

Governors in Florida and Wisconsin both turned down billions in federal grants to build new rail. Other states didn’t waste time for a reallocation of the funds. Has Indiana or Kentucky applied for similar funding in Metro Louisville?

dan chandler said...

I think my question was rhetorical.

Jeff Gillenwater said...

I think you're right, Dan, given that Kentucky and Indiana "leaders" allowed an already in place, already federally favored light rail plan for the region to die on the vine with no state or local match for federal funds in order to allocate additional dollars to an ORBP plan for which they still, years later, have no idea how to pay.

dan chandler said...

Creating an “Authority” to circumvent the democratic process and build unneeded infrastructure for the sole purpose of private profits is hardly a new business model. It began with Robert Moses in New York. To understand the realpolitik, I highly recommend the Pulitzer Prize winning book The Power Broker by Robert Caro.

http://tinyurl.com/43fnuqc

If you don’t have time to read all 1400 pages (it’s a fast read), at least check out the reviews on Amazon. Familiar themes?

Dare I ask who our Robert Moses is?

dan chandler said...

Again, I think my question was rhetorical.

dan chandler said...

For clarification, I have absolutely no problem with private profits. Far from it.

My problem is accepting at face value the claims of those who will personally profit when there are other and possibly better options available.

ian said...

"Dare I ask who our Robert Moses is?"

Thankfully, Dan, we do not have one.

Jeff Gillenwater said...

A valid point, Josh. I think we sometimes give some of our "authorities" too much credit for having taken the time to actually fully comprehend the issues they're talking about it. The result is to sometimes mistake general incompetence for conspiracy.

Name the Bridges Authority members who have strong backgrounds in public transportation, urban planning, community development, housing, etc.

Yeah, I didn't think so.

The real problem, other than the undue influence of political patrons, is often the ridiculousness of what passes for a rational decision making process. Around here, that indiscernible muddle is what's known by the people taking advantage of it as being "publicly vetted".

Curtis Morrison said...

I'm inspired everytime I see more thoughtful analysis of this project in my homeland than I do in the big fancy city. Go New Albanians!

@Dan- So glad you brought up Robert Moses. I haven't never took time to read the book, but a 15 minute investment in his wiki page will awaken any casual reader to the banality of our dearest Bridges Authority.