Required reading of a non-political nature, all of which surfaced during a sultry high summer’s weekend:
Downtown Saturday: Everything’s waiting for you in New Albany (Harold J. Adams; Courier-Journal)
Downtown Saturday: Everything’s waiting for you in New Albany (Harold J. Adams; Courier-Journal)
Thirty New Albany merchants joined yesterday in the launch of an effort to bring weekend crowds back to the city's downtown area with the first monthly "Downtown Saturday."
“Downtown Saturdays” organizers Curt and Pam Peters had this to say about the inaugural effort in a Sunday e-mail:
Thanks to everyone for your work on the first Downtown Saturday. Many good things happened, and it will only get better. We stopped by at over half of the Downtown Saturday merchants, and almost all said that they had increased traffic. We had 72 visitors at the Gallery on Pearl - by far the best Saturday we have had since we opened. We can meet Tuesday, August 14, between 4:30 and 5:30 p.m. at the Speakeasy on State Street (in their large room) to share comments and suggestions. Our next Downtown Saturday will be Sept. 1. Please invite additional merchants to participate and to come on August 14 if possible. Best wishes to all and thanks to everyone.
Meanwhile, it is axiomatic that New Albany must be smarter to succeed. Here’s one way that the city will defy the Luddite limitations imposed by its no-progress-at-any-Steve-Price faction:
Students, staff await Purdue campus in New Albany (Dale Moss; Courier-Journal)
Purdue is building on one of the best corners in New Albany. But the project is not what you might figure. It won't be Purdue University Southeast, like nearby Indiana University Southeast.
Following is another stellar contribution from a youthful local “guest columnist,” whose essays have been so good that it makes us wonder why our local newspaper doesn’t have its own regular columnist:
ROBISON: A better New Albany (Daniel Robison; Tribune)
With some time off before school beckons again, I decided to take a backseat spot in a car headed to Colorado last week. Not only did I welcome spending some time away from New Albany, I particularly wanted to compare how our community measures up with others I encountered along the way.
But regrettably, now it is time for NAC’s twice monthly John Entwistle Memorial “Fiddle About” city council meeting preview, today prefaced by these local press hors d’oeuvres:
No-bid contracts split council; New Albany debates 2 agreements’ validity (Dick Kaukas; Courier-Journal)
Members of the New Albany City Council will be asked … to authorize litigation to determine if a $3.3 million, no-bid contract awarded by the sewer board and another for $507,000 awarded by the storm water board are valid.
Both contracts went to Environmental Management Corp., the company that has operated the New Albany sewers since 2001.
The issue of whether bids should have been sought for the contracts has split the council.
And, closer to home …
Court challenge faces New Albany City Council vote (Eric Scott Campbell; Tribune)
Quite frankly, we’re at a loss to explain why the council’s factions have lately realigned in such an inexplicable manner, with progressive stalwarts like Jeff Gahan combining with arch-reactionaries like Dan Coffey to make us scratch our heads in ever-escalating wonderment, but such is the climate as the fall campaign season approaches.
A few days ago, at-large Republican councilman Kevin Zurschmiede circulated the following statement via e-mail to neighborhood associations, constituents and others on his contacts list:
Hello,
As your City Council Representative I am asking that all concerned citizens of New Albany come to the next City Council meeting.
But regrettably, now it is time for NAC’s twice monthly John Entwistle Memorial “Fiddle About” city council meeting preview, today prefaced by these local press hors d’oeuvres:
No-bid contracts split council; New Albany debates 2 agreements’ validity (Dick Kaukas; Courier-Journal)
Members of the New Albany City Council will be asked … to authorize litigation to determine if a $3.3 million, no-bid contract awarded by the sewer board and another for $507,000 awarded by the storm water board are valid.
Both contracts went to Environmental Management Corp., the company that has operated the New Albany sewers since 2001.
The issue of whether bids should have been sought for the contracts has split the council.
And, closer to home …
Court challenge faces New Albany City Council vote (Eric Scott Campbell; Tribune)
Quite frankly, we’re at a loss to explain why the council’s factions have lately realigned in such an inexplicable manner, with progressive stalwarts like Jeff Gahan combining with arch-reactionaries like Dan Coffey to make us scratch our heads in ever-escalating wonderment, but such is the climate as the fall campaign season approaches.
A few days ago, at-large Republican councilman Kevin Zurschmiede circulated the following statement via e-mail to neighborhood associations, constituents and others on his contacts list:
Hello,
As your City Council Representative I am asking that all concerned citizens of New Albany come to the next City Council meeting.
It will be Monday August 6th at 7:30.
Some members of the Council are bringing forth a resolution that will essentially become the initial steps for an increase to our Sewer Bills.
The resolution calls for spending unlimited tax payers dollars towards hiring an attorney to determine the validity of two recently signed contracts between the city's Storm Water Board and the city's Sewer Utility.
I am tired of our citizens finding out after the fact that their tax dollars have gone to waste on frivolous law suits and attorney expenses.
I would like to see as many folks turn out at this meeting as possible.
Please pass this information on to your friends, neighbors, and families and please come to the meeting and voice your concerns to the City Council.
I am thanking you in advance for passing along this information and attending the meeting.
Sincerely,
KEVIN W ZURSCHMIEDE
NAC’s senior editor has a prior obligation to entertain an out-of-town guest and will be unable to attend the melee, err, meeting, but it is hoped that we’ll have someone in attendance to provide coverage of the session.
Good luck, good luck … whomever you are.
2 comments:
Guess that means that I have to buy my own beer after the meeting.
Certain "high ranking" officials of the city where sighted at tumbleweed on state street saturday night having a good laugh regarding the meeting tonight.
(as well as the personal lives of other city employees who were not present).
Fortunately I will be driving south for a well earned, and much overdue vacation.
Post a Comment