Showing posts with label primaries and caucuses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label primaries and caucuses. Show all posts

Saturday, August 29, 2020

Walk On By.



Whatever Democratic voters think — and most of them like Bernie Sanders and his platform — the dominant bulk of Democratic officials oppose them both with an organized vigor they seldom bring to combat with Republicans.

This strikes me as a detailed and balanced assessment. Long, but essential.

If you cared not for Bernie Sanders as a Democrat, you should read the essay anyway; there's plenty there for you. If you were a Sanders backer, as I was, it's very important to absorb this.

Bernie Sanders’s Five-Year War, by Matt Karp (Jacobin)

How he lost and where we go from here.

... First, (Bernie Sanders' campaigns) demonstrated that bold social-democratic ideas, well beyond the regulatory ambitions of Obama-era progressives, can win a mass base in today’s United States. An uncompromising demand for the federal government to provide essential social goods for all Americans — from health care and college tuition to childcare and family leave — stood at the heart of the Sanders project from beginning to end. Starting at 3 percent in the polls and conducting two presidential campaigns almost entirely on the strength of this platform, Sanders built the most influential left-wing challenge in modern history.

Yes, candidates from Jesse Jackson to Dennis Kucinich also supported single-payer health insurance, but their campaigns did not end with polls showing a newfound majority of Americans backing Medicare for All, let alone massive supermajorities among Democrats and voters under sixty-five. Yes, leftists from Michael Harrington to Ralph Nader had long declared that a bipartisan corporate class rules America, but they did not turn that insight into a political movement capable of winning primaries in New Hampshire, Michigan, or California.

Nor is the partial success of the Sanders campaigns merely a hollow “discourse victory.” It has presented concrete evidence for a proposition that mainstream political observers scoffed at five years ago, and that the American left itself had grandly announced rather than demonstrated: that “democratic socialism,” driven by opposition to billionaire-class rule and dedicated to universal public goods, can win the support of millions, not just thousands. Across the last half century, any activist with a bullhorn could proclaim this to be true, but Bernie Sanders actually fucking proved it.

Of course, as Bernie’s defeat makes clear, there is a vast gulf between winning exit polls and winning power. If the Sanders campaigns illuminated American social democracy’s unknown political resources, they also revealed, in a dramatic fashion, the determination of their opponents. This is the second practical lesson of Bernie’s five-year war: the unanimity and ferocity of elite Democratic resistance, not only to Sanders himself, but to the essence of his platform.

Friday, July 24, 2015

Well, well: "Matthew Nash for 5th District City Council."

When Matt swapped photos here yesterday, I suspected the Green Mouse was right.

Can we speak candidly?

It's widely known that Gahan administration operatives targeted incumbent 5th district rep Diane Benedetti for defeat in the primary. I know this because one of them told me so. Of course, it cannot be quantified as to how much the down-low Gahan chicanery contributed to Dustin Collins' eventual victory, but now it's moot, as Collins was forced to withdraw from the race owing to health concerns.

If I haven't said it already in blog space, all the best to Dustin. He's a personable and bright young man, and there is no doubt about his sincere commitment to public service. Get well, quickly.

But there's an election to be held, and the News and Tribune's Daniel Suddeath explains what happens next as Democratic Party chairman Adam Dickey follows arcane procedures lifted straight from the pages of "Foucault's Pendulum" (alas, not a Disney flick) to ensure his chosen and pre-ordained outcome. Remember the famous song Bob Dylan wrote about Dickey, "Tangled Up in Puppet Strings"?

Qualified Democrats residing in District 5 can submit for nomination by caucus members. The caucus will be held at 6:30 p.m. on Aug. 7 at the New Albany Roadhouse, which is located at 1706 Graybrook Lane.

That's right: The Democrats will caucus by drawing straws and drinking ice cold Bud Light long necks. Fiction simply cannot improve on reality when it comes to satirizing these people.

Know this: None of my obvious and ever expanding derision for our local Fix Is In Democrats should be implied as outweighing my personal esteem for Matt Nash, whose hat has been tossed into the ring in the 5th. I won't get a vote in this one, and we'll see what happens. Even if we still disagree on certain topics, Benedetti has done a good job. Matt's a great fellow, and politics is a nasty business. Anyone got a tea leaf?

A word of advice to Matt: If you don't win the race, be careful the newspaper doesn't screw you on your weekly column resumption * ... and seriously, you might wish to distance yourself from the recently abominable record of your old man on the Bored of Works.

By the way, anyone got a broom?

Here's Matt's Fb campaign page. I wish him well.

Matthew Nash for 5th District City Council

I would like to announce my intention to seek the position of New Albany City Council in the 5th District. For the past six years I have expressed my opinion on how to make our city a better place in a weekly column in the News and Tribune. Now I am actually doing something about it.

I believe that New Albany is a great city but we could be doing better. Between now and November 3rd I will discuss with all of the citizens of New Albany how we can work together to make our city the best that it can be.

* Matt's already dealt with it here.

Friday, May 09, 2014

A Tale of Two Hancocks, and other thoughts on the primary by Matt Nash.

You've already read my side of the primary.

ON THE AVENUES: Apathy or allergy?

... However, the more I explored the inner depths of my threadbare conscience, it became increasingly evident that lofting a middle finger on Tuesday against politics as usual in this sullen, stunted, centipede of a city held a certain, almost indefinable charm.

Arguably, Matt Nash provides a broader perspective, and that's what we love about the newspaper. Broadness.

NASH: A 2014 primary recap, by Matt Nash (Anti-Houndmouth Gazette)

Another question about yard signs was the design of one of the candidates for judge. With Judge Glenn Hancock retiring from the bench there were two people from each party vying for his seat. Republican candidate Jim Hancock had signs that closely resembled some that Judge Hancock used in a previous election.

In an interview in another newspaper candidate Hancock denied that he was trying to copy the ones used by the judge in previous campaigns. When I first saw the signs driving home from work a couple of months ago I actually did a double-take before I realized what had occurred. Besides the color scheme, font and design they are totally different signs. If you were to take a look at the 4-by-8 foot signs with a magnifying glass you would see his first name clearly in the disclaimer.

For a candidate to want to represent us as judge he should be above gimmicks to get elected. If he really wanted to differentiate between himself and the popular sitting judge he may have went ahead and placed his first name prominently on the signs. His opponent in the primary who has much less political experience or name recognition went a step further and put his picture on many of his signs.

Thursday, May 05, 2011

John Gonder thanks you.

And we thank John Gonder.

Of the six at-large candidates competing for the Democratic nomination, John's was the most consistently sensible, intelligent message. His is one dependable council vote for human reason. We need only find four equally reliable others.

Thank You

... I look forward to the general election with the confidence that the City will be in good hands so long as caring, committed people run for office, and of equal importance, so long as caring, committed non-office holders stay engaged in the pursuit of progress.

Monday, February 14, 2011

Greg Phipps files for city council, 3rd district.

Earlier today, Greg Phipps officially filed as a Democratic candidate for city council in the 3rd district. This means that the incumbent Steve Price has an opponent, and a very good one.

No other updates have been made at the clerk's site, but I know that John Gonder filed for an at-large seat last Friday. He's a Democrat, of course.

Now's as good a time as any to state that I also intend to file as an at-large candidate in the Democratic primary, probably by Thursday morning, maybe earlier than Thursday if there's time.

Helpfully, my first campaign speech has already been posted at Kitchen Fable. It's almost as if she knew. How spooky and weird; maybe it was hacked.

Absolutely the best meal ever served on Formica.

There's more to say, and plenty of time to say it, so until then, let's have a Progressive Pint and get ready to have fun.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

A third way is defanging a Copperhead.

One way is to "build a fleet of 200 warships known as triremes." Another is to elect a 3rd district council person capable of rising just a bit above the shuck and jive of Willy and the poor boys. The week to come is going to be momentous ... and fun.

How to Make a Small City Great, at NewAlbanyBooks.

Friday, February 11, 2011

Who's running in the primary?

Not just yet, but in the meantime here's the link to learn who has filed to run in the May primary:

http://www.floydcounty.in.gov/PDF/2011Primarycandidates.pdf

If you are a member of The Price Is Wrong underground, here's your secret coded signal for today: "Tenant rights stop at the point of my big dog's nose." Be sure and run it through the Random Primary Candidate Generator before buying the Sharpies, or King Larry's pharmaceutically mandated tumescence might upset the apple cart.

That is all.

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

All aflutter at Twitter: Bookseller files for Council 5.

Randy himself tweeted it yesterday.

Suggested to me that you readers might be offended if you found out elsewhere; I filed for city council, Dem primary, 5th district today.

Daniel Suddeath and the Tribune follow suit today.

Local business owner Randy Smith filed to run for New Albany City Council Dist. 5, currently held by Diane McCartin-Benedetti.

Looks like blogging may be obsolete ... but one thing I know: More Benedetti fans than you ever knew existed will now be appearing regularly as "anonymous" in the Trogosphere.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Today's Tribune column: "Regime change now, brown cow."

I'd like to thank my family and the academy, and a special shout-out to Dan and Steve for their thoughts in the very same issue of the Tribune as my column today, illustrating how their own expertise with respect to neighborhood improvements, of which there is no known evidence, anyway, still somehow trumps actions currently being financed by grants that they opposed from the start, and have taken no interest until asked to comment.

Solid, guys; solid. I hear there are openings at the forthcoming Dollar General on Vincennes ... and that they pay slightly more than the council.

BAYLOR: Regime change now, brown cow

It is time once again to ask the question that has plagued thoughtful New Albanians almost from the moment the Scribners put ashore almost 200 years ago and began to brew ale.

Can any city that routinely elects the likes of Dan Coffey and Steve Price ever hope to be efficient and modern in any meaningful sense of the words?

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Is this really what David Halberstam meant?

I have no argument with the Tribune's lead platitude today. Yes, of course it would be nice to have genuine choices, and to increase the dim wattage of elected officials hereabouts, but there's just one small problem.

Running in the May primary requires declaring a party affiliation, right? And America provides a grand total of two non-choices: Republican (Dick Cheney's fascist peers) and Democratic (can any party Steve Price belongs to be a real political party?), both sans coherent local-issue platforms.

Independent candidacies in November? Possible, but with the odds stacked against them because they must solve the tendency of unprincipled and partisan straight-ticket ballots cast by uneducated robots for non-parties without coherent platforms.

Look, either "best and brightest" implies intelligence, or it is a purely nonsensical concept.

As such, if they haven't already moved away, perhaps the "best and brightest" avoid participation in politics precisely because the current system is decidedly unintelligent, and they can see this fact with disheartening clarity.

In fact, perhaps they see the local bottom-feeding political system as a failure, and determine that their time is better spent at their jobs and careers, and building community in other, myriad ways.

TRIBUNE EDITORIAL: A call to New Albany’s best, brightest

What we need are choices. So many times in recent years, including this past election where county seats were up for grabs, several races have been uncontested. That is not what a democracy is all about ... that is not what we need in these crucial times. Running a government in these tough economic times, will continue to take the best, and brightest, we have to offer.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Stepping up, stepping back, sidestepping ...

Reader Ruthanne left a comment on my post yesterday, and said something that I anticipated when I hit the "publish" button.

It's filing time again -- they're going to grieve me ...

"If I'm not mistaken, there are at least a few regulars on this blog who reside in the 3rd District. Can we expect at least one of you to step up and make an announcement by Feb. 16th?"
Yep, more than a few ... including me, and that's why I'm elevating this comment to the front page. It is a legitimate question, and I intend to answer it by tomorrow, at least as it pertains to me, seeing as I cannot speak for everyone. This morning, there's beer business to conduct across yonder, as-yet-untolled Ohio River, so I may not get to it until later. But I'll get to it. Thanks.

Monday, January 17, 2011

It's filing time again -- they're going to grieve me ...

As the Tribune recently reminded us:

The first day candidates can file to run in the city primary is Jan. 19, and the majority of current New Albany City Council members plan to seek re-election this year ...

New Albany candidates have until noon Feb. 18 to file in the county clerk’s office, which is located in room 235 of the City-County Building at 311 Hauss Square.

A few random thoughts.

The local Democratic machine’s decline was underway long before last November's comprehensive shellacking; in the months since, it has disappeared from view. Does New Albany’s Democratic Party still have the strength (and the will) to contest municipal elections in 2011?

In spite of the Democratic drubbing, the inner city still held the line, thanks presumably to straight ticket voting. Remembering that precious few Democrats in New Albany know or care about the party’s national platform, ongoing pockets of resistance in the inner city are a good thing for Democrats overall.

But: Given that those city council’s principal dullards most in need of removal register as Democrats and benefit from these straight party votes, it makes it harder to facilitate their forced retirement without the pre-assistance of the machine – which was unwilling to cooperate when breathing, and now barely exists at all.

And yet, some insist that the unprecedented size and scope of last November’s Republican victory – albeit benefiting from county GOP cadres and without municipal offices up for grabs – make it at least possible that Republicans might do better in the inner city this time around.

Do the Republicans have candidates? One would think that success has bred greater numbers and a larger pool for selection. If the GOP has a credible candidate in a place like the 3rd district, is there any way such a candidate can beat Steve Price, who typically routs Republicans in the fall after winning divided Democratic primaries in the spring?

Is there any room for viable independent candidacies in any of this (or these)?

Discuss?

Monday, May 03, 2010

Alert "Hot Wheels": Schansberg makes his 9th district pick.

Predictions, observations and questions about the GOP's highest profile contest tomorrow, from a former candidate and current (gasp) Travis Hankins supporter. No spoilers here, so click on the link to see who Eric thinks will win:

Who's going to win in the 9th (District)?, by Eric Schansberg (Schansblog).

We've had a unique GOP primary here in the 9th District of Indiana -- presumably, the only time a five-time candidate has gone up against two serious campaigners.

Saturday, April 03, 2010

Let’s take a poll.

Given the absence of action on the Democratic side in the May primary, how many of you plan to vote on the other side of the aisle, just for the sheer fun of it?

Imagine: I can vote against Mike Sodrel by voting for Travis Hankins, knowing that if by some miracle Sodrel’s money doesn’t triumph in the primary, the extremist nutcase Hankins will be far easier for Baron Hill to topple in the fall.

And: I can vote for Ron Grooms and help dispense with the latest local Palin wannabeen.

Trouble is, I won’t be able to drink Progressive Pints while doing it, but in the fall, SB 75 kicks in, and then … Elector!

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Schansberg to eschew Libertarian run for Congress, will work for GOP's Hankins.

Tribune sez:

Schansberg ditching Libertarian run to chair Hankins campaign (by Daniel Suddeath).

A former suitor of Indiana’s 9th District U.S. House seat, Eric Schansberg chose not to run in 2010 because he found a candidate that reflects his core political principles ...

... But he isn’t totally exiled from the race. Schansberg has volunteered for Republican Travis Hankins’ team, and is serving as campaign chairman ...

... Hankins emphasizes issues that Schansberg also touted during his two runs at the House: Reduction of the size of government, instilling Congressional term limits and like Schansberg, Hankins is pro-life on abortion.
Schansberg elaborates on the forthcoming Republican primary at his blog:

The 9th District Republican primary: an overview.

One last thing: Does (Mike) Sodrel's entry help (Todd) Young or Hankins more so? On the one hand, Sodrel divides the establishment vote (at least somewhat). On the other hand, Sodrel divides the segment of voters who are most interested in social conservatism.

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

Open thread: Super Tuesday.

Dual Clintonians or Obama?

In a few hours, we may have a clue as to the direction the Democrats will be following in 2008. As an aperitif, I’m suggesting this article by the inimitable Frank Rich:

Ask Not What J.F.K. Can Do for Obama, by Frank Rich (New York Times).

Now that John McCain has gathered momentum, will the Republicans end their misery and eviscerate Mitt Romney? The West Virginia caucus results earlier today certainly seem to suggest that the answer is yes, with all the delegates in poverty central going to the doomed theocratic huckster Huckabee.

Stay tuned, and feel free to discuss here as the results unfold.

As for me, it will be delightful to cast my eighth consecutive anti-Republican presidential vote this fall. I'd prefer it be for Barack Obama.

Give me Obama-McCain, and a generational competition that represents a true choice, and we’ll see.