Showing posts with label post mortems. Show all posts
Showing posts with label post mortems. Show all posts

Saturday, March 17, 2012

“That was nothing more than a kangaroo court going in there,” Coffey said.

The ironic thing about yesterday's carefully choreographed Urban Enterprise Association "reordering" was that apart from the presence of all nine board members (a council-appointed seat remains unfilled) and four members of the public, five other public figures past and present were very much a part of the proceedings:

Doug England (former mayor), Carl Malysz (former deputy mayor, current housing domo), Jerry Finn (Horseshoe Foundation), Greg Sekula (Indiana Landmarks) and Ed Clere (state representative).

The meeting wasn't about them, and yet in many significant ways, it was entirely about them, to wit: Is the UEA's work to be conducted from within by its board, with or without a full-time director, or is it to be directed from without, by elected/appointed/self-appointed arbiters of the Commonweal?

I'm excerpting the newspaper's coverage in two sections. In the first part, the main points are correct, but some of the details are not.

New Albany UEZ head gets axed; Mike Ladd relieved from duty at special meeting, by Jared Clapp (News and Tribune)

NEW ALBANY — The executive director for the New Albany Urban Enterprise Zone Association was relieved of his position at a special meeting of the UEZ board on Friday morning.

Mike Ladd’s termination came from a 4-0 vote with two abstentions. Dan Coffey, board member, left the meeting before a vote was taken.

David Duggins, board member, said those abstentions came from new board members who said they would have otherwise voted in favor of the measure.

Perhaps because the reporter was not actually present at yesterday's meeting, the vote totals are incorrect. I reported it correctly yesterday via Twitter:

Norrington, Dillman, Norwood, Duggins and Howie vote yes. Streckfus, Bergman and Schmitt abstain. Coffey left mtg. Mike Ladd fired #nauea

On Saturday morning, board member Ann Streckfus added this, also at Twitter:

The Trib has the UEZ story wrong. I've contacted them, but for the record, I did not vote to terminate Mike; I didn't state I would have.

Other than that, the article is substantially correct. The city council representative to the UEA board is Dan Coffey, and he gets the final words, as reported by Clapp:

Coffey said he didn’t think Ladd had done anything wrong, which is why he left before a vote was taken to relieve him.

“That was nothing more than a kangaroo court going in there,” Coffey said. “That was a decision I assume was made before any board members got in there, so I wasn’t going to be any part of that.”

He said he thought the money going into the UEZ was sought by other city governing entities for purposes that didn’t mesh with the state’s intentions for the UEZ — job growth and promotion of business within those zones.

“When you take money out to advertise with Develop New Albany and you take money out for a building that was dilapidated... I don’t care if it was $12,500 or $2,500, you’ve got money that could help fix those up through the parks department and they don’t want to look at it,” Coffey said.

Thursday, May 05, 2011

Price plants a seed, and the soil votes "no." Thousands cheer.

If you were looking at yesterday’s primary election as a morality play about the coming succession, black contrasting with white, teeming with pro- and anti-government forces locked in pander-to-pander combat to determine the city’s direction, then my guess is you’re feeling a wee bit cheated.

That’s because voters notoriously opt to send mixed signals, and on this morning after, with the Elector-induced dementia temporarily abated, looking at Tuesday’s results reveals a tea leaf patchwork.

In selecting underdog Jeff Gahan, Democrats resoundingly rejected outgoing mayor Doug England’s bizarre backroom deal to bring Irv Stumler, for all intents and purposes a Republican, to the forefront of the local Democratic Party.

However, these same voters did not opt for rejecting Doug England. Rather, he effortlessly cruised to the top of the city council at-large standings, edging out John Gonder and Shirley Baird.

Voters also ignored the pathetic bleatings of “a vote for virtually anyone we dislike is a vote for Doug England,” handing me 1,341 votes in a losing at-large bid, pushing Randy Smith to within two dozen votes of Diane “My Boy Plays Bassetball” Benedetti in the 5th, and enabling Greg Phipps’ historic toppling of Li’l Stevie in the 3rd.

And so, Gahan won big, yet among his most vociferous backers were Price and Vicki Denhart, both of whom recorded epic fails.

In the 3rd district, political newcomer Greg Phipps decisively proved what we’ve always said was true: Price cannot come even remotely close to winning a primary against a single, thoughtful opponent. In fact, Price barely improved on his 2007 primary performance against two foes, topping out at a mere 42% against Phipps. Our brave new world in the 3rd? Priceless, and so let the mindless karaoke resume, this time safely removed from council chambers.

Meanwhile, over in the bafflingly hermetic 1st district, Denhart’s fundamentally overarching narcissism received a world-class and long overdue puncturing, not coincidentally illustrating the Price Three-Way Cluster F/Theorem in reverse, and ensuring Dan Coffey’s entirely unmerited victory over Denhart and the luckless Theresa Timberlake, the latter again losing by only a handful of votes.

Based solely on Denhart’s previous recorded claim (made to the newspaper) to have spent $1,200 on yard signs, it cost the taxpayers’ purportedly Hillaryesque savior fully $8.16 for each of her paltry 147 votes.

Had I spent at the same rate, my 1,341 votes would have cost just shy of $11,000, and yet I spent less for them than the cost of steak, eggs and the build-your-own Bloody Mary bar on Sunday afternoon at Bank Street Brewhouse.

Denhart and I both lost. C’est la vie … although that’s French, not Italian. Gucci … Chianti … Rocco, and all that.

Yawn.

---

Irrespective of one’s opinions about Jeff Gahan, whom I endorsed, there is much to admire in his win over Irv Stumler and Paul Etheridge. In fact, combining Gahan’s and Etheridge’s vote totals yields a stunningly decisive 67% of Democratic primary voters rejecting Stumler’s candidacy, despite England’s touting, thousands of dollars spent and the active support of current job holders.

Gahan slogged it out with a ground game the old-fashioned way, lapped the supposed thoroughbred, and deserves acclaim for standing for office as a Democrat -- as admittedly muddled as the New Albany definition of Democrat usually is.

Still, to his credit, Gahan neither mouthed mock Republican policy bullet points, nor pretended to be anything other than he is, and has been for eight years as a council person – the latter a mixed record, but a record nonetheless. He ran on it, and won against what remains of the machine.

Right on.

---

In the end, the Stumler conversion charade simply didn’t hold water, and the voters saw right through it.

Now, who pays for the fiasco in the larger sense?

Not Stumler, who is free to devote his dotage to Keep New Albany Clean and Green, albeit without the taxpayer monies inevitably destined to finance the do-good non-profit had he actually become mayor. He’s had a long career and a fine, productive life. His money once again can openly flow to the Republican National Committee, because as was said in ancient Rome: “In Moolah, Veritas”.

Not England, who is a political pro’s pro. As we’ve already seen, he has somehow wiggled out of political responsibility for The Bad Deal, and with a brand new coat of Teflon to boot, although as we’ll see, there are repercussions.

It’s further down the totem pole where one spies dripping, gooey egg on the faces of otherwise solid folks like Todd Bailey, Matt Denison and several prominent others, whose enthusiasm for a tawdry and self-serving political accommodation leaves them with, shall we say, uncertain prospects for future job security.

Regrettably, their zeal for a fractured Deal may have helped turn undecided voters away from Stumler, and toward the two alternatives. The whole spectacle disturbed me. It was ugly, heads eventually will roll, and that’s sad.

---

Where does the aftermath leave New Albany?

On balance, the big winner after yesterday is none other than Mayor England. He also may prove to be the big loser, though not just yet.

Gahan beat the odds and scuttled The Stinky Deal, but England emerged unscathed, with his underlings left holding the bag (and the tab) for the schemes and plots.

Furthermore, the anti-England tsunami predicted by Troglodyte Nation did not materialize; there was some collateral damage, though scantily defined. Incumbents Coffey and Benedetti made it through, barely. As yet, the former has no Republican opponent, although there are rumors of an independent insurgency. The latter cannot use her family as human shields forever.

Honestly, I did damned well for a first time contender who ignored every accepted rule. It would have been great fun to put the GOP on trial for six solid months as part of a general election bid, but so it goes, and I’m both serene and vindicated by the majority of the results.

Elsewhere, perhaps with some toughening before November, Mrs. Baird will be able to put a dent into Kevin Zurschmiede’s incumbency. Zurschmiede will be the only credible Republican council at-large candidate, and while Shirley adeptly played her classic insider Democratic Party strategy to take the third at-large slot, her standard “I just want to help people” line won’t go very far against the workmanlike Zurschmiede, who can point to his stolid experience whilst receiving assistance from the many Democrats who aren’t.

But, predictably, the final Shakespearean twist finds England both winning and losing. His political career will see another chapter, and yet his dream of controlling both executive and legislative branches is dashed. Rather than a pliant, genial elder, England will be compelled to deal with either a wary Gahan or a Republican yet to be named, and furthermore, he’ll be obliged to negotiate with eight other council members, each with his or her own agendas, and without Hizzoner’s customary recourse to absolutism.

Entertaining? Yes, it will be.

An improvement? We can only hope it will be.

The best possible outcome? Nope. They never are.

Thursday, November 04, 2010

Today's Tribune column: "Hardtack, humbuggery and hangovers."

It's important for me to point to those rare occasions when I agree with the exultant GOP county chairman, Dave Matthews, so here's this month's convergence. It is reported by Daniel Suddeath in today's Tribune.

Matthews said there’s already a “consensus of dissatisfaction with the city council as a whole. You don’t have to look far to see the City of New Albany needs new leadership.”
Who knows? We may harmonize yet again some time next spring. As we await that momentous occasion, here is today's column link:

BAYLOR: Hardtack, humbuggery and hangovers

... There is no uncertainty about the ultimate verdict, because by the time you read this, the eternal futility of America’s two-party power duopoly will have been reconfirmed. The same country that fought a lengthy Cold War on the sacred principle that one-party states are quite bad will have illustrated yet again that two-party states are no better.

If anyone uncovers evidence supporting the proposition that the two party system actually works, please share it with me. I’ll be at the bar, fortifying my liver for next year’s city election cycle.