The Urban Indy blog takes a look at pedestrians and cyclists at risk in our cities, and it's a timely consideration. Only recently, Broken Sidewalk reported on a spate of traffic accidents, with five peds/cyclists dead and one injured on metro Louisville streets in ten days. It would help if every now and then, motorists were held accountable. That's probably why you almost never hear bicyclists (or pedestrians) bitching about traffic calming.
For all the progress that has been made in recent years in raising consciousness about alternative solutions for mobility, we are reminded of how far there is to go, as was the case earlier this year when Kentucky State Fair officials concluded that bicycles might make their scrum even less organized than it already is. However, good news on a tiny scale still leaks out of Louisville, as when we learn that new bike parking has been installed on Frankfort Avenue. If only the riding can be made as safe as the parking.
New Albany's specific sorrows continue to be symbolized by a piecemeal approach, although Matt Nash kept it positive when considering the relationship of bicycle to bike lanes and Luddite to political promises in Nawbony. My unsolicited advice to the Gahan Administration is this: Get as pro-active as possible to make the historic inner city a place where pedestrians and cyclists are safe. Two ways streets and traffic calming are two places to start reclaiming the notion of a city being about its people, not about its cars.
4 comments:
The Onion weighs in too.
http://tinyurl.com/73x4lqj
whats up with all the mopeds...how are they legal? it boils down to money and taxes...if you own a car, then you pay taxes, which in turn pays for the roadways...if you don't own a car, then...do any of your taxes go towards roadways to pay for thoses bike lanes?
"it boils down to money and taxes...if you own a car, then you pay taxes, which in turn pays for the roadways"
Actually, it doesn't boil down to car ownership or gas taxes at all. That's a myth.
U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) released a report in January that debunks it.
Some conclusions:
*The U.S has spent $600 billion more on highways than what those taxes and fees have paid for
*Those taxes and fees only cover about half the cost of building and maintaining roads
Anyone who says that bike lanes, mass transit, etc., must be self-supporting are holding them to a higher standard than roads.
A good explanation from Eric Jaffe at the Infrastructurist:
Roads Don't Pay for Themselves
LW: Also roads were around way before Automobiles
Post a Comment