Showing posts with label unification. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unification. Show all posts

Saturday, October 03, 2020

German Unity Day.









We're just shy of 31 years since the Berlin Wall fell. That era, say 1988-1992, was as pivotal for my own life as for world history. I'll probably spend the remainder of whatever time I have left on this planet trying to explain why. I'll always be grateful for the opportunity to see East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and the USSR in the summer of 1989. The experience altered the trajectory of my life.

Coronavirus mutes German Unity Day celebrations, (Deutsche Welle)

German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier on Saturday paid tribute to the courage of protesters who led the peaceful revolution that paved the way for the reunification of East and West Germany 30 years ago. 

Commemorations to mark German Unity Day are underway in the city of Potsdam, about 25 kilometers (15.5 miles) southwest of Berlin. Such a momentous anniversary would usually be met with fervor, but this year's festivities have been overshadowed by the coronavirus pandemic.

"We look back with gratitude at the end of the Cold War and the beginning of a new era," Steinmeier said in a keynote speech at the official ceremony. "Today we live in the best Germany that has ever existed" ... 

Wednesday, October 16, 2019

Video: The Treuhand (1991-94), and how newly reunited Germany put capitalism back together again in the former GDR.


(Video at link below.)

November 9, 2019 will be the 30th anniversary of the Berlin Wall's obsolescence. Communism's collapse was followed by a period of intense politicking, resulting in the unification of the two German states on October 3, 1990.

It was said at the time that while the planet had numerous examples of how to turn an economy from capitalist to communist, no one yet knew how to flip it the other way around.

The video explains how Germany did it.

In many respects the process wasn't pretty, although it bears recalling that for better or worse -- maybe bits of both -- East Germany was the only East Bloc nation to have a "West" half capable of absorbing it.

Hungary, Poland, Czechoslovakia and the others had their own privatization procedures, and controversies. When it came to figuring out how to return seized assets, these nations often had to extend the verification period into the 1930s to account for both Nazi and Communist expropriations.   

It's the stuff of history geeks, but some readers will enjoy this video as much as I did.

East Germany and the difficult legacy of the Treuhand (Deutsche Welle)

The word 'Treuhand' still triggers stronger reactions in eastern Germany. For millions of former East Germans, the change from a planned to a market economy meant unemployment - and an affront that still rankles today.

As President of the Treuhandanstalt, the agency charged with privatizing the old East German economy from 1991 to 1994, Birgit Breuel pushed ahead with painful privatizations and the closure of thousands of companies - and became the hated symbol of the transition to a market economy. After decades of silence, she returns to this chapter of her life and talks in detail about a time when everything was running full speed ahead and rational decisions to completely rebuild a country needed to be taken. How did she make her decisions? How does she rate them in retrospect? And what motivated her to take on such a mammoth task at all? How much leeway did the Treuhand have? Were there any other ways to turn the former East German economy around? The filmmakers interview managers, politicians and experts about the work, goals and challenges of the Treuhand, diving back into the heady years from 1990 to 1994 and illuminating the backgrounds and consequences that still have an effect today.

Wednesday, May 30, 2018

Newspaper's Morris aims for Gahan's political jugular: "We seem to have a power struggle going on here and the only way to solve it is to have a unified government."

Unity, not uni-gov. Or maybe not unity, either.

Revolt of the stenographers?

If this city-versus-county is a reprise of North and South Korea without nukes, it's hard to decide who is playing the role of Donald Trump, as opposed to Kim Jong-un.

Hmm.

Me thinks a journalist just isolated himself from the politicos, although in fairness, it isn't like the city's governing clique ever intended to confide useful information to him -- or, that there ever was any intention on his part to ask deep and probing questions.

Why is an anchor the new city seal when circled wagons are so much more eloquent?

By the way, the councilman in question is my 3rd district's Greg Phipps.

MORRIS: Stop the bickering and work together, by Chris Morris (Where Tom May Roams)

We have so much here in Floyd County of which to be proud. It's such a beautiful area, and we are just 10 minutes from Louisville, which also has many offerings.

But the best entertainment may be the way New Albany and Floyd County governments go at each other. What was once a few jabs from time to time has turned into a regular free-for-all. It's definitely an US versus THEM mentality.

If you attend city government meetings, or scroll through social media posts, you can tell immediately the perception some have about just how bad county government is and how it is not to be trusted. Recently, a New Albany city councilman even said he would never again agree to enter into an agreement with county government. EVER! It seems like county government is pure evil, only doing things like dumping hazardous materials in the city’s impound lot and elsewhere, and not paying its bills.

snip

We seem to have a power struggle going on here and the only way to solve it is to have a unified government. This county is too small to have two governments not able to work together. We, the taxpayers, don't need duplicated services like two parks departments, two planning and zoning departments and two communication centers. And there is a possibility we will have a city hall separate from the City-County Building.

Unified governments work, cut unnecessary expenses and provide better services for the residents. While there will always be disagreements, there will no longer be the US versus THEM mentality.

It may take a few years, but I think unified governments are the future. There is just not enough tax revenue to go around, and sooner or later the people, who are the voters, will get fed up with all the bickering and lack of cooperation.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

ON THE AVENUES: Not simple at all.

ON THE AVENUES: Not simple at all.

A weekly web column by Roger A. Baylor.

Book review: Simple Stories: A Novel,” by Ingo Schulze.

The Berlin Wall fell almost a quarter of a century ago, and two German states divided by opposing –isms were quickly reunited.

These days, we often forget that while Chancellor Helmut Kohl wasted no time in seizing his historical moment by rapidly pressing home the notion of immediate German unity while the window was yet ajar, not everyone on either side of the Cold War divide thought it was a good idea.

Many observers envisioned a more gradual transition, with the two ideologically disparate German states eventually merging into one, but in the end, the prevailing mood did not favor gradualness. Events galloped forward, and in one giant gulp, one of the world’s most vibrant Western capitalist economies swallowed the gritty socialist reality of the German Democratic Republic and its “Ossified”, outmoded Soviet-issue cars, factories, apartment blocks … and perhaps most importantly, people, along with their conditioned responses.

It surely amounted to a bailout; not some curative largesse meant for far-off Ireland or Iceland, but aimed toward eastern cousins widely regarded as poor, oppressed and degraded. Unsurprisingly, these folks didn’t enjoy being lectured about their shortcomings as part of the deal to be absorbed and rebuilt, and these many years later, in spite of everything, a level of indigestion apparently persists.

It required forty years for the GDR to become what it was by the time it expired. A teenager from Germany’s eastern provinces, struggling to cope with the devastating legacy of wartime defeat, first would have been subjected to a period of socialist reorientation, then taken his or her place in the work force, and by 1989, would have been approaching retirement when compelled yet again to fathom an ideological sea change and its inevitable dislocations and redundancies.

Four decades isn’t much when it comes to geology, but it is a long time in human affairs. It will take that long or longer – and the passing of generations – before the scars of unification fade.

Most often this unification tale is related through economic statistics, but it never was a story meant to be story meant to be told by cost-benefit analyses. Rather, it was about millions of ordinary people, getting along as best they could, being raised – working, playing, living, loving and dying – in a certain way, and then overnight, being told (as opposed to being asked) to unlearn most of what they knew, and to relearn multiple different social, cultural, economic languages.

---

This is the backdrop of Ingo Schulze’s novel, Simple Stories. Schulze was born in GDR times, and is not a writer by training, but he has established a considerable niche in Germany as a contemporary chronicler of his eastern homeland as it was during the initial phase of unification in the early 1990’s.

The novel itself is constructed as a series of inter-related stories, linked by characters and events already described, or about to be. While I can imagine this unconventional format being handled more deftly by the likes of Peter Nadas, Schulze suffices for the purpose of conveying what it feels like to be stuck in a moment, one you have little choice but to get out of, even if the transition is confusing.

A wall may fall down, barriers may vanish, and although one awakens to a different country, the experience cannot automatically produce a different person. Tellingly, the novel’s characters cope with varying degrees of efficiency with the most fundamental difference between socialism and capitalism: In the former, you were provided sustenance and the propaganda was directed toward you from the top down, but in the latter, if you’re not to starve, you must find work disseminating the propaganda itself, whether as a telemarketer, sales person or peddler, accepting a few more farthings than before to do your job, less overall security, and the latent hope, however ephemeral, that someday the wealth might accumulate.

Some of Schulze’s characters plod forward into their new lives with nary an opinion, while others remain mired inside self-images of the past. The novel shifts quirkily before fading into a collage of the mundane, rather than end with any sort of resolution or moral. No one was saved, and I was left with a feeling of bleakness and unease. West Germans had a lot more things than East Germans, although the question of whether either system possessed a soul is something we’ll all continue to debate, long after the GDR is forgotten.

---

In the aftermath of recent European Union elections, and a trend of anti-austerity results, I am struck by the irony that when a candidate in France or Greece now speaks about the imperative of resisting Germany’s solution to Europe’s economic crisis, residents of Dresden, Greifswald and Potsdam have traveled full circle: From part of the problem to part of the solution, and back again, with at least some presumably never having vacated the high rise flat allotted them back when Erich Honecker held sway even if their Trabants are long gone.

Once they were the woeful recipients of largesse, playing the roles of underperforming Mediterraneans to the frowning bankers in Frankfurt with their turnips for checkbooks. Now, once again, they’re just those damned imperialist Germans. Indeed, what a long, strange trip it’s been.