Purity balls, Plan B and bad sex policy: inside America's virginity obsession, by Jessica Valenti (Guardian)
We are teaching girls that their virginity makes them special. But we're also sending the wrong message – that without their virginity, they're damaged goods
The men and girls in the photos hold hands and embrace – the young women are in long white dresses, the men in suits or military regalia. If some of the girls in the pictures weren't so young - Laila and Maya Sa up there are seven and five years old, respectively - the portraits could be mistaken for wedding or prom pictures. What they actually capture, though, are images of those who participate in purity balls – father-daughter dances featuring girls who pledge to remain virgins until marriage and fathers who promise to protect their daughters' chastity.
The images from Swedish photographer David Magnusson's new book, Purity, are beautiful, disturbing and tell a distinctly American story – a story wherein a girl's virginity is held up as a moral ideal above all else, a story in which the most important characteristic of a young woman is whether or not she is sexually active. This narrative of good girls and bad girls, pure girls and dirty girls, is one that follows young women throughout their lives. Purity balls simply lay that dichotomy bare. In a clip from a Nightline Prime episode on these disconcerting events , a father tells his braces-clad daughter, "You are married to the Lord, and your father is your boyfriend."
Showing posts with label premarital sex. Show all posts
Showing posts with label premarital sex. Show all posts
Monday, May 05, 2014
Creepiness exalted: "Purity balls, Plan B and bad sex policy: inside America's virginity obsession."
Like the Supreme Court justice suggested, one knows obscenity when he or she sees it. The entire notion of a "purity ball" is raincoater creepy.
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
"Having sex before marriage is the best choice for nearly everyone."
I've tried everything imaginable to lure Healthblogger back to the comments section. If this one doesn't do it, nothing will.
The moral case for sex before marriage, by Jill Filipovic (guardian.co.uk)
Condemning premarital sex and promoting abstinence are not working. Lasting, loving relationships are made through intimacy
... Our state and federal tax dollars have long been spent promoting "chastity". While conservative commentators are happy to assert that waiting until marriage is the best choice for everyone and people who don't wait aren't doing marriage "the right way", sex-positive liberals hesitate to say that having sex before marriage is an equally valid – if not better – choice for nearly everyone.
So here it goes: having sex before marriage is the best choice for nearly everyone.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)