LIVE TO EAT: "Why do we celebrate Thanksgiving?"

Thanksgiving at Churchill Downs?

In 2016 we chose to spend the Thanksgiving holiday week in Catania, Sicily. Afterward more than one person asked me, "How do they celebrate Thanksgiving in Italy?"

"The same way as the 4th of July," I replied.

No snark intended; people forget the specific nature of national holidays.

I celebrated Thanksgiving while in Catania by eating a mixed grill of horse meat. There were no lamentations about the absence of turkey and the fixings; we'd long since stopped bothering with all that, and picked up Chinese on the big day. It was a household tragedy a few years back when Vietnam Kitchen stopped opening on Thanksgiving, although we still go there on Christmas Day.

Prior to Catania, the last time I'd been overseas for Thanksgiving was in 1991, during the English teaching gig in Košice, Czechoslovakia (now independent Slovakia). Given that the traditional "national dish" of Slovakia is bryndzové halušky, or potato dumplings with sheep's cheese and bacon bits, it's what I chose to eat on Thanksgiving Day, at a wine cellar with something resembling Tokaj.

For Thanksgiving in 2019 we're south of Slovakia, in Slovenia. Beer and sausages sound peachy keen to me, but whatever you choose to eat, drink and do today, here's food for thought.

Why do we celebrate Thanksgiving?, by Soleil Ho (San Francisco Chronicle)

I don’t really know what to do with Thanksgiving.

I enjoy flipping through recipes for sweet potato pie, roasted brussels sprouts and spiced cranberry sauce as much as anyone else, but it’s difficult to disentangle the holiday from our colonial history. It seems like we certainly try our hardest to do so.

When I was in elementary school, my teacher had my class draw straws to divide us up into Natives and Pilgrims; the former made feathered headbands out of brown construction paper, and the latter crafted black buckled hats. I think we sang a song about togetherness. (My mother-in-law, an elementary school teacher in the Midwest, tells me her school no longer does this. Another teacher who works in the North Bay says his school barely acknowledges the holiday in its curriculum. I’m curious to know what other schools do.)

Though one could argue that Thanksgiving can and should be an apolitical occasion, the persistent retelling of history that occurs around the holiday is steeped in our national myth making. We still popularly romanticize the origin of the holiday — and by extension, the origin of the country — as one where pilgrims from Europe broke bread with Native Americans, who freely gave and gave until there was nothing left to give. I’m sure I’ll get more than a few email responses that speak to that fact.

Yet so much ink has been spilled and so much breath has been expended in service of clearing up the story of the holiday. As Dennis Zotigh, a cultural specialist at the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian, writes, “Why should Native peoples celebrate Thanksgiving? Many Natives particularly in the New England area remember this attempted genocide as a factual part of their history and are reminded each year during the modern Thanksgiving.”

The responses to his question from Native folks from around the country vary. I was struck the most by one from a reader in Montana: “It’s important to share the whole, true story of the first Thanksgiving... I will say this, The generic idea of Thanksgiving, or taking the time to be with family and friends and give thanks for all the blessings in our lives, the big and small, is a great practice and should happen more often. I wonder how we can turn a negative into a positive? Can we have an honest Thanksgiving? Can we move forward and, if so, where do we begin?”

Is there more we can do than watch as the turkey dinner magazine and newspaper spreads are published on cue?

The idea of tapping Native American thinkers to comment on occasions like Columbus Day or Thanksgiving and surface what may be traumatic experiences for the benefit of a largely non-Native audience feels mostly crass to me, though I think the New York Times’ great piece featuring chef and activist Sean Sherman was a step in the right direction. Here at The Chronicle, we also ran a story over a recent Thanksgiving about how Northern California Pomo and Yurok Indians are striving to restore nearly lost food traditions.

Still, I would rather that Sherman or others get full-on columns in food publications so that, again, that subject matter isn’t relegated to holidays where we want to feel a bit absolved. It’s like a blushing acknowledgment, a wink to show that we can see the bigger picture, but the rest of the holiday goes on without issue.

To backtrack to what the writer from Montana wanted us to consider, what are some ways to reframe the holiday that might make space for all of these contradictions and complications? I’d love to hear from you if you have any suggestions that we could share with your fellow readers.

Vaughn on We the People's meals for the homeless: "The health department is forcing well intentioned community leaders to jump through unnecessary regulatory hoops."

At the risk of another round of abuse from the omnipresent neighborhood watch, we've already had a glimpse at a fresh new controversy, one quite oddly receiving no ink whatever until after Tuesday's election.

But wait -- I thought there aren't any homeless people in NA, much less a need to feed them.

 ... "A grassroots group that provides weekly meals to New Albany's homeless community could see some changes as it faces issues with the Floyd County Health Department, and organizers are worried about the future of the program" ...

Nick has a view on this matter, but before linking you, consider this paragraph from his post.

It baffles me as to just how the Floyd County Health Department has regulatory power over a private picnic. If I were to have a family reunion picnic at a local park, would my family have to prepare our food in a health department-approved kitchen as well? Or would we be allowed to prepare food in our own kitchens at home?

There's another side to this. As a friend pointed out:

A point can certainly be made that the needy and the homeless also deserve the protection of government. We've both eaten at restaurants that have no idea how to prepare and handle food. Imagine what Aunt Gladys's idea of proper food handling is?

To reiterate, thus far Dr. Tom is pursuing a non-confrontational course in the case of We the People's meals for the homeless.

Addressing Nick's question about family picnics, theoretically, the FCHD probably already has the authority to oversee family reunion fare. What it doesn't have is the cover of political will (thankfully) -- or more importantly, manpower or a budget. Those usually come after a precedent for widened authority has been established.

In 2013, the FCHD was making a calculated probe when it suddenly declared its authority to oversee temporary beer dispensing, and to require food handling permits of pourers. It was unrefrigerated tripe, so we at NABC objected, and the Great Beer Pour War of 2013 went all the way to the top of state government before the FCHD was overruled and a new, clear guideline formerly written.

Nope, he never even apologized for the trouble he put us through. 

Had we not fought the test probe, it is likely that health departments across the state would have used the FCHD's "win" as a precedent to extend their regulatory authority, and by extension, to increase their budgets and manpower.

This same sort of test probing may be what's happening right now with We the People, and it's why we should question any such effort to expand regulatory authority by administrative means, absent clarity in law.

Let them serve! by Nick Vaughn (The Aggregate)

Every Sunday, the grassroots group We Are the People of New Albany serves the homeless and those in need of a hot meal at Bicknell Park. Organized by Kim Hunt Payne and Marcy Garcia, the group seeks to feed those who are hungry, give fellowship to those in need, and fill a void left by our local government.

Recently though, the Floyd County Health Department has stated that the group can no longer serve food prepared in separate locations and must instead prepare food in a health department-approved kitchen. Additionally, instead of offering a warm cooked meal the group could also only offer prepackaged food not prepared by them ...

But wait -- I thought there aren't any homeless people in NA, much less a need to feed them.

Who are you going to believe, Jeff Gahan or your own two eyes?

Meanwhile, Dr. Tom is being far more sensible than usual.

Meal program for New Albany's homeless community faces uncertain future, by Brooke McAfee (Hanson's Folly)

NEW ALBANY — A grassroots group that provides weekly meals to New Albany's homeless community could see some changes as it faces issues with the Floyd County Health Department, and organizers are worried about the future of the program.

We the People of New Albany, a volunteer-run meal program, meets from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. every Sunday at Bicknell Park at 315 Silver St. to serve meals, which are donated by community members. The meals for the homeless are now made in volunteers' homes, but the Floyd County Health Department is concerned about the large number of home-cooked meals distributed by the group. The program could potentially be closed down unless it changes its operations.

The organization started its weekly picnics this summer, and over the months, they have grown significantly. They started out serving eight people at the first picnic, but the volunteers now serve about 50 to 70 people each week, organizer Kim Payne said.

According to Floyd County Health Officer Dr. Tom Harris, the group qualifies under the Indiana regulations for food preparation due to the amount of meals being cooked at individual homes and handed out. In order to continue serving meals to the homeless, the organization would have to cook the food in a kitchen approved by the health department or simply provide pre-packaged food with a longer shelf life ...