Showing posts with label homosexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homosexuality. Show all posts

Saturday, January 06, 2018

Molly houses and the Buggery Act, not to neglect the sodomitical, befurbelowed denizens of Lad Lane.

From the Atlas Obscura link.

"In this climate, molly houses were an all-too-necessary place of refuge. Sometimes, these were houses, with a mixture of permanent lodgers and occasional visitors. Others were hosted in taverns. All had two things in common—they were sufficiently accessible that a stranger in the know could enter without too much hassle; and there was always plenty to drink."

Apart from being fascinating, uplifting and horrific, this article is a mighty effective vocabulary builder. Let's hope Shane is taking notes for a future installment of his excellent new words.

Molly houses have been scrubbed from the history books, but we can't know where we're going without knowing where we've been. It's a constant mind-boggler as to why humans spend so much precious time persecuting each other.

Live and let live, anyone?


How the 18th-Century Gay Bar Survived and Thrived in a Deadly Environment
, by Natasha Frost (Atlas Obscura)

IN 1709, THE LONDON JOURNALIST Ned Ward published an account of a group he called “the Mollies Club.” Visible through the homophobic bile (he describes the members as a “Gang of Sodomitical Wretches”) is the clear image of a social club that sounds, most of all, like a really good time. Every evening of the week, Ward wrote, at a pub he would not mention by name, a group of men came together to gossip and tell stories, probably laughing like drains as they did so, and occasionally succumbing to “the Delights of the Bottle.”

In 18th and early-19th-century Britain, a “molly” was a commonly used term for men who today might identify as gay, bisexual or queer. Sometimes, this was a slur; sometimes, a more generally used noun, likely coming from mollis, the Latin for soft or effeminate. A whole molly underworld found its home in London, with molly houses, the clubs and bars where these men congregated, scattered across the city like stars in the night sky. Their locale gives some clue to the kind of raucousness and debauchery that went on within them—one was in the shadow of Newgate prison; another in the private rooms of a tavern called the Red Lion. They might be in a brandy shop, or among the theaters of Drury Lane. But wherever they were, in these places, dozens of men would congregate to meet one another for sex or for love, and even stage performances incorporating drag, “marriage” ceremonies, and other kinds of pageantry.

It’s hard to unpick exactly where molly houses came from, or when they became a phenomenon in their own right. In documents from the prior century, there is an abundance of references to, and accounts of, gay men in London’s theaters or at court. Less overtly referenced were gay brothels, which seem harder to place than their heterosexual equivalents. (The historian Rictor Norton suggests that streets once called Cock’s Lane and Lad Lane may lend a few clues.) Before the 18th century, historians Jeffrey Merrick and Bryant Ragan argue, sodomy was like any other sin, and its proponents like any other sinners, “engaged in a particular vice, like gamblers, drunks, adulterers, and the like” ...

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Bob Russell says "God" gave you your race, not your sex.

I am of the conviction that religion is not a tax-exempt issue at all. It is a taxable issue. By the way: GET OFF MY PORCH, Bob.

Are Gay Rights Civil Rights?

... I am of the conviction that homosexuality is not a civil rights issue at all. It is a behavioral issue. To have sex with someone of the same gender is an individual choice. It is not a distinctive like race, which is a God-given feature that cannot be denied ...

Friday, August 12, 2011

As opposed to "Hoosiercommosense," I'm guessing?

In his own words, Matt Nash explains his Friday column at OSIN.

This week MY FRIDAY COLUMN takes a look at the Amy Gesenhues column from July 20, 2010: BEING GAY ISN'T WRONG.

While I believe that Amy wrote a good column and I would not try to speak for her, I thought it was important to point out some of the hypocrisy in the comments from that column:

TOLERANCE AND UNDERSTANDING IS COMMON SENSE

Monday, November 15, 2010

"Out at Home."





"Out At Home: The Glenn Burke Story" Is A Tragic Tale Worth Seeing, by Nico (Athletics Nation blog).

... since Glenn Burke came out to teammates and ownership in the late 1970s, no gay major league baseball player has come out -- not to teammates, not to owners, not to fans -- while he was still playing. And if you watched "Out At Home: The Glenn Burke Story," aired this past Wednesday on CSN Bay Area and airing again next Tuesday night at 8:00pm on the same channel, you understand why gay athletes tend to keep their sexual orientation to themselves.