Showing posts with label cancer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cancer. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 06, 2019

"The ultra-rich are benefitting from disaster capitalism as institutions, rules and democratic oversight implode."


My birthday went well, and renewed thanks to all expressing good wishes, but to be honest any thoughts of my fine day Saturday are tempered with sadness and frustration over the two mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton.

As such it's important to understand what too few of us care to consider, that this American system we blindly tout as "best ever, blah blah" is functioning exactly as designed, albeit not as we delude ourselves into believing it is designed, because the point of capitalism at this amok stage of its development is for violence to be fed into the machine and compounded violence to come gushing right back out the other side.

Follow the money, people.

Oligarchic government for the sake of obscene capital accumulation among the few can persist only by dividing and conquering the many, so that we fight each other and not the cancer itself, and accordingly, most of what I read on a daily basis represents little more than nitpicking over symptoms, dividing us even further.

Capitalism is diseased, and the disease mocks us as we kill time by debating the plot lines of the most recent comic book film.

#EatTheRich

From Trump to Johnson, nationalists are on the rise – backed by billionaire oligarchs, by George Monbiot (The Guardian)

The ultra-rich are benefitting from disaster capitalism as institutions, rules and democratic oversight implode

... the oligarchs want is not the same as what the old corporations wanted. In the words of their favoured theorist, Steve Bannon, they seek the “deconstruction of the administrative state”. Chaos is the profit multiplier for the disaster capitalism on which the new billionaires thrive. Every rupture is used to seize more of the assets on which our lives depend. The chaos of an undeliverable Brexit, the repeated meltdowns and shutdowns of government under Trump: these are the kind of deconstructions Bannon foresaw. As institutions, rules and democratic oversight implode, the oligarchs extend their wealth and power at our expense.

The killer clowns offer the oligarchs something else too: distraction and deflection. While the kleptocrats fleece us, we are urged to look elsewhere. We are mesmerised by buffoons who encourage us to channel the anger that should be reserved for billionaires towards immigrants, women, Jews, Muslims, people of colour and other imaginary enemies and customary scapegoats. Just as it was in the 1930s, the new demagoguery is a con, a revolt against the impacts of capital, financed by capitalists.

Followed by advice for the "centrist" Democrats; in the UK, as in the USA.

Being Anti-Boris Is Not Enough, by Ronan Burtenshaw (Jacobite)

Attacks on character and legal issues didn’t stop Berlusconi and Trump, and they won’t stop Boris Johnson. Sticking to Corbyn’s strong democratic socialist message is the way to beat him.

... Compare his barren offering with Labour’s: introducing a real living wage, nationalizing rail, mail, energy, and water, building 100,000 council houses per year, banning zero-hour contracts, introducing free childcare, abolishing tuition fees, ending punitive benefit sanctions, stopping the privatization of the National Health Service, a transition to green energy producing thousands of jobs. No wonder the Tories want a culture war.

Boris Johnson will soon face a defining moment of his premiership. On October 31, he will either have to abandon a substantial portion of his base or drag the country into an unpopular no-deal Brexit. No amount of “Churchillian” spirit — and his attempts to invoke this during his speech were almost comically weak — will overcome this political reality.

But for Labour the coming weeks are also important. There will be considerable pressure to join an anti-Boris campaign, abandoning the party’s transformational program to coalesce with whatever establishment ghoul finds the Prime Minister’s latest scandal too unseemly.

The price of such an alliance has already been made clear by Jo Swinson, newly elected leader of the Lib Dems: ditch Jeremy Corbyn. Take Boris on not with a plan to improve millions of people’s lives but with vagaries about “progressive values,” outrage over his transgressions against established politics, and a nostalgia for the recent past.

It’s easy to see the appeal of uniting all those who oppose Boris Johnson. But diluting Labour’s politics is exactly the wrong way to beat him. The only way to stop the political and moral void Johnson brings to Downing Street consuming the entire political horizon is to make it confront day-to-day hardships. Hardships his party and his class have forced on so many for so long.

Sunday, February 12, 2017

Talking about cancer on the radio.

I have no hard and fast methods for determining what appears in this space. If it interests me in any way, it's eligible, and the blog continues to function as a personal diary. Consequently, it comes down to this: the older you get, the more you think about topics like this.  

The day two men talking about cancer on the radio made the nation stop, by Miranda Sawyer (The Guardian)

Steve Hewlett tells of the impact of his cancer diaries on Radio 4

 ... For several months, Hewlett has been popping up on PM, giving listeners an account of his cancer (it was initially found at the bottom of his oesophagus). He has also been writing about his experience for the Observer, in his My Cancer Diary series. A BBC man of many years’ standing – he was Panorama’s editor during the 1990s, and has presented The Media Show on Radio 4 since 2008 – Hewlett has approached his diagnosis and subsequent treatment with a journalist’s thoroughness. He has researched on Google, talked to friends who have been through cancer, investigated where best to get treatment, listened to and challenged his doctors. Whatever he has encountered, he has almost always been prepared. In an early broadcast, when he questioned a registrar over his prescription, he was allowed an extra drug, one that gave him 10% more chance of survival. “I think I just prescribed myself,” said Hewlett to Mair. To me, he says: “The more engaged with your treatment you are, the better treatment you get.”

Friday, December 02, 2011

Friday potpourri: Three ... two ... one ... and we have flushing.



It's true that outgoing New Albany city attorney Shane Gibson often was unfairly targeted by abuse from disgruntled troglodytes, but a change was inevitable given the third England administration's downward devolution. As the incoming mayor's appointment illustrates, the city attorney works for the current occupant, and my personal belief is that Stan will be a very good city attorney.
Mayor-elect Jeff Gahan appoints New Albany city attorney; Stan Robison has served New Albany before

Gahan confirmed that Robison sent a letter on his behalf to department heads and other supervisory employees of the current administration to tell them that they must go through the application process if they wish to keep those jobs.
---

Whenever the Indiana State Chamber of Commerce wields its legislative agenda to define what it means to be in business, I'm almost immediately embarrassed to be a called a businessman. There needs to be a different word so I can save face:

State Chamber of Commerce to roll out sweeping legislative agenda

---

The thought of Greater Louisville Inc.'s Joe Reagan taking precious pomposity time from his position on the Tolling Authority to portray a cancer specialist, too, somehow reminds me of Elena Ceausescu's inflated portfolio during Communist Romanian times:

Curtis Morrison: GLI using your tax money to redefine the definition of cancer