The Floyd County Historical Society met Tuesday evening in the Elsa Strassweg Auditorium of the New Albany Floyd County Public Library, with guest speakers Steve Goodman and Carl Holliday providing a brief history of the Culbertson Widow’s Home on Main Street.
Steve’s and Carl’s latest project, the renovation of the former Redmen’s Club into Culbertson West, was discussed previously in NA Confidential.
Longtime Scribner history teacher Vic Meginnity introduced Steve and Carl, averring that the duo must be considered the foremost historical preservationists currently active in New Albany, and his assessment undoubtedly is true.
Steve’s presentation belied his insistence that he isn’t much of a public speaker, and he clearly outlined the life and times of merchant and philanthropist William S. Culbertson, whose endowment and hands-on management of the home for Civil War widows, orphans and the aged paid continual dividends until the home’s closure in 1971.
We came away form the meeting with heightened respect for the vision and achievements of Steve and Carl, who helped to give Main Street a profound makeover in less than a decade.
Their success, both artistically and commercially, refutes the various hoary maxims that still constitute conventional “wisdom” in New Albany, such as “that’ll never work in this town,” and “you can’t do that here.”
Yes, it will … and yes, you can … but just imagine how much more successful all such progressive endeavors might be if not for the absolutely inexplicable fact that the doomsayers almost always are natives of long standing!
Newcomers to New Albany invariably arrive here filled with optimism and see endless possibilities, while our own residents, filled with self-loathing and ennui, are dismissive, choosing instead to demand “no progress at any price” as though proposed improvements in the quality of life were personal affronts to their dignity.
They hitch their pathological fear of change to any number of expedient bandwagons, some populist, some religious, and others selfish to the point of self-aggrandizement – and it is the latter, so often displayed in public forums, that is so embarrassing when contrasted to the efforts of those working so diligently to prevent New Albany from sinking into a cesspool of low expectations.
Imagine a pair of experienced, savvy entrepreneurs who rescue a venerable but sadly neglected historical structure, transforming a den of iniquity into a respectable, income-producing entity that helps to improve the quality of the neighborhood as a whole.
Imagine neighbors complaining about this feel-good story, as was the case as Steve and Carl have rehabilitated the Box Tree Inn, their second bed & breakfast on Main Street … and contemplate the self-flagellation, the thinly-veiled envy, the rampant inferiority complex that lies at the heart of so much of New Albany’s “no progress at any price” obstructionism, which opposes any and all legitimate manifestations of progress out of no more coherent philosophy than sheer, unadulterated spite.
Steve Goodman and Carl Holliday continue to demonstrate that it is possible to rise above this self-inflicted communal miasma, to achieve results, and to create value through vision, creativity and hard work. Rather than suffer misplaced vilification from the "it can't be done here" faction, they are to be commended ... and just as obviously, we need more like them if New Albany is to enjoy a renaissance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Joe, I don't think John's reaching at all with the dowager metaphor.
As this: Elderly woman with social ststus, down on her luck, then restored to previous position.
Weighing in...
The Widow's Home is (was) a dowager, to my mind, as is The Plaza Hotel in Manhattan, the Queen Mary in Long Beach, and certain distinguished ladies in this community.
No overreaching with the metaphor so far as I'm concerned.
The next time you take a stroll past the Widow's Home, or any of the properties mentioned in this blog entry, use a critical eye and see what historic preservation has taken place.
You may see a hastily-painted facade thrown together over a long weekend with no prep work. Or wrought iron fencing covered with a cosmetic coat of paint and no rust removal prior. Maybe you will note the slowly decaying roof, or the collapsing cast iron fancywork over the porch that again, was covered over by a coat of paint and is being held in place by wire to keep it from falling.
You may also see the rotting cornices and woodwork that have never been touched or repaired.
You could even go so far as to check a copy of the variance requirements to see if any of them have been met.
You could see an unfinished, poorly maintained structure used to produce income. Sort of like what slumlords do when they get a piece of property and milk it for whatever money they can get.
Or you could see a fancy new sign, listen to the owners' claims and read some newspaper articles.
Thank you, New Alb Annie. I don't think anyone of us wants to let another make our decisions for us.
A critical eye is a healthy thing, particularly when a point is constructively made.
I for one appreciate your warning to be wary of the superficial.
I would happily lift New Alb Annie's comment to the marquee and open the discussion, and not to belabor the point, but she's an anonymous poster. If she'd like to let me know who she is (privately would be fine), then I'll open the thread.
I have responded to Roger's request. Although I do not wish my identity posted publicly for various reasons, I also do not believe in making statements without owning up to them if asked.
Perhaps at some time this topic will bear further discussion.
Thank you, Annie.
Post a Comment