LETTERS: July 15, 2009 ... Malysz refutes reader’s assertions
I would like to clear the air regarding the England administration’s efforts to acquire the Hoosier Panel property, which was the subject of a letter to the editor written by Tim Deatrick.
The New Albany Redevelopment Commission, which at the time included membership by Mr. Dan Coffey, decided to purchase the property from the current owner for redevelopment purposes, so as to rid the Fairmont neighborhood of what has become a serious blighting influence to the area ...
New Albany is a state of mind … but whose? Since 2004, we’ve been observing the contemporary scene in this slowly awakening old river town. If it’s true that a pre-digital stopped clock is right twice a day, when will New Albany learn to tell time?
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Malysz refutes reader’s assertions.
Carl Malysz, director of community development, has written a letter to the editor of ghe Tribune.
"The offer was for the fair market value of the property, less the estimated cost to address the contamination."
ReplyDeleteWhere are the details? How much has the cited offered? How much for remediation of pollution? Why can't elected officials talk with numbers...like they have some secret authority to make deals with tax money? Publish all the facts and then make the right decision and move on...
More PR - where are the facts + numbers??