Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Just for the record, anatomically speaking.

Getting "permission" to publish is one thing, and refusing to attribute sources quite another. When the forum for non-attribution is a cowardly trognonymous blog, then the bar is raised higher.

So it goes. If Screech had integrity, we'd be discussing this in the comments section there, but alas, it doesn't exist.

Grow some balls, "Erik".

3 comments:

  1. According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, a LIE is defined as: to create a false or misleading impression

    Erika reprinting someone else's work and not giving credit to the rightful author creates a false or misleading impression that Erika wrote it herself. Hence, Erika is a liar.

    Not like this hasn't been pointed out multiple times, so she can't claim ignorance. She just continues to lie.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aside from the lies, the really funny part is that their respect for Senator Clinton is apparently so great that they refuse to respect her wishes. She conceded the nomination a long time ago and has since asked that her supporters vote for Senator Obama.

    So the idea now seems to be "to hell with what Senator Clinton says".

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was thinking the same thing this evening. I read an account where after Clinton formally released her delegates, one of her supporters said "She doesn't have the right to tell us what to do like we're little kids". Another said "I don't take my marching orders from Hillary Clinton anymore".

    They're turning on their inspiration? I would just as soon they vote for someone else anyway. The illogical thinking that choosing McCain, who is on the other side of the spectrum from Clinton, over Obama is mindboggling to me. They'd rather vote in the candidate who will fight against their "hero" on almost every issue...the guy who famously talked about how ugly Chelsea Clinton is...the party that used to call the Clintons "Communists". Makes sense to me...

    ReplyDelete