Your correspondent approached city council president Larry Kochert at 11:00 p.m. last evening, just after his atrophied and erratic gavel signaled the conclusion of New Albany’s latest shameful exercise in legislative ineptitude.
I asked: “Do you have any intention of running a meeting fairly while you’re still here?”
The question was repeated to him at least three times.
Kochert’s response: “What did you do with your leotards since you’ve lost weight?”
As mating rituals go, it was almost endearing. I have decent legs, I guess, but this come-on almost qualifies as a “hunka-hunka burnin’ love.”
Moments before, in a startling eye-opener, CM Kochert had openly admitted to breaking the law, the therein lies another instructive story pertaining to his escalating unsuitability for office.
It helps to know that last night’s designated set piece of amateur troglodyte theater (parts are assigned on a rotating basis) centered on providing Kochert’s old friend, DICK STEWART, with ample public speaking time to air a self-serving complaint that he is the victim of calculated political persecution stemming from his own questionable decision to blatantly plant numerous of his political yard signs in public rights-of-way, which according to clear and specific passages in the city’s ordinances, is plainly illegal.
STEWART helpfully provided the audience with photos that showed the universally improper places where his signs had been planted prior to being uprooted by the city after complaints, the latter almost certainly phoned in by STEWART’S antiquarian cohorts in the Coup d’Geriatrique bad thespian troupe.
The drama of STEWART’s typically buzzing, gnat-like lamentation of victimization was delayed from his original target of public speaking time at the council session’s beginning, when only agenda items are to be addressed, to non-agenda public speaking at the conclusion of the plodding, rancorous demonstration of native dysfunction – but not before president Kochert, in the first of at least two dozen abject instances of failure to exercise control over the meeting, sought to allow his incontinent lapdog territorial pissing rights.
Hours later, when public speaking time resumed, the whole spectacle finally played out, and city operations director Tony Toran came to the end of a forceful defense of his decision to enforce the law on the books in response to the complaints, Toran pointedly asked Kochert how the council president knew that signs had been planted in the spots depicted in STEWART’S photos, when none were there any longer to be seen.
“Because I helped him put them there,” responded Kochert, whose contempt for ordinance enforcement – while well documented over a period of decades – certainly has never been so brazenly (and breezily) conceded in public.
That’s your council president, folks. Rest assured that the civilized world isn’t laughing with him.
A full catalogue of the evening’s many grating reminders that our sitting city council, as currently constituted by people who can’t get along, and artlessly “administered” by a president who has no desire to administer, is beyond my ability to relate this late in the evening, or perhaps ever.
Verily, you’re read it all before.
Another bizarre and contrived conspiracy theory, this one pertaining to the city’s sanitation contract, was excitedly unfurled, duly refuted, and the resolution calling for immediate action tabled with recommendation of cowardice. The resolution’s sponsor, CM Donnie Blevins, subsequently melted down publicly and began predicting reprisals, famine and locusts. In default mode, CM Steve Price prattled nonsensically about carts, horses and doing things little by little. CM Dan Coffey, an uncharacteristic voice of reason for most of the meeting, lost his religion in an outburst against STEWART, but for once, you can’t blame the Wizard of Westside. Candidate STEWART’s pneumatic prodding is a pestilence of Biblical proportions.
Unfortunately, most ordinances requiring substantive decision making were endlessly debated sans direction from the chair, then unceremoniously tabled so that the whole, endless, vituperative process of unregulated foolishness can flare up right where it left off. One that did come to a vote was defeated. It was the second reading of an effort by CM Coffey to overturn the savagely debated recent firefighter hiring ordinance and revert to previous practice.
The crowd in attendance openly hooted and jeered these diverse and assorted travesties. The gavel was silent as unreconstructed trogs heckled public officials. Voices were raised, screaming sessions erupted, and through it all CM Kochert remained utterly devoid of the slightest considerations of impartiality and subtlety in openly playing favorites in his role as presiding officer. By the standards of my well-deserved and uncontested ouster earlier this year, half-a-dozen could have been ejected last night, and were not.
As with Kochert’s sadly characteristic decision that breaking the law if perfectly fine so long as it enables him to score political points, his increasing unwillingness to exercise control and do something about the escalating chaos during council meetings reinforces a legacy of astounding underachievement that would be laughable if not so harmful to any hope of progress in the city of New Albany.
There is nothing novel or surprising in any of this. To consistently enable disruption and dysfunction is to expect disruption and dysfunction in return, and so it is. We can hope only that the cleansing power of the forthcoming elections will remove those impediments to professionalism that currently control the council.
The last thing Larry Kochert said to me Thursday night presumably was meant to be facetious: “You’re a fine citizen.”
I can’t say that I disagree with the councilman, seeing as one obligation of citizenship beyond the obvious imperative of obeying the law is the exercise of free speech -- to point in the direction of ward-heeling political hacks whose historically exaggerated powers now are diminishing, and to say clearly and without reservation:
I asked: “Do you have any intention of running a meeting fairly while you’re still here?”
The question was repeated to him at least three times.
Kochert’s response: “What did you do with your leotards since you’ve lost weight?”
As mating rituals go, it was almost endearing. I have decent legs, I guess, but this come-on almost qualifies as a “hunka-hunka burnin’ love.”
Moments before, in a startling eye-opener, CM Kochert had openly admitted to breaking the law, the therein lies another instructive story pertaining to his escalating unsuitability for office.
It helps to know that last night’s designated set piece of amateur troglodyte theater (parts are assigned on a rotating basis) centered on providing Kochert’s old friend, DICK STEWART, with ample public speaking time to air a self-serving complaint that he is the victim of calculated political persecution stemming from his own questionable decision to blatantly plant numerous of his political yard signs in public rights-of-way, which according to clear and specific passages in the city’s ordinances, is plainly illegal.
STEWART helpfully provided the audience with photos that showed the universally improper places where his signs had been planted prior to being uprooted by the city after complaints, the latter almost certainly phoned in by STEWART’S antiquarian cohorts in the Coup d’Geriatrique bad thespian troupe.
The drama of STEWART’s typically buzzing, gnat-like lamentation of victimization was delayed from his original target of public speaking time at the council session’s beginning, when only agenda items are to be addressed, to non-agenda public speaking at the conclusion of the plodding, rancorous demonstration of native dysfunction – but not before president Kochert, in the first of at least two dozen abject instances of failure to exercise control over the meeting, sought to allow his incontinent lapdog territorial pissing rights.
Hours later, when public speaking time resumed, the whole spectacle finally played out, and city operations director Tony Toran came to the end of a forceful defense of his decision to enforce the law on the books in response to the complaints, Toran pointedly asked Kochert how the council president knew that signs had been planted in the spots depicted in STEWART’S photos, when none were there any longer to be seen.
“Because I helped him put them there,” responded Kochert, whose contempt for ordinance enforcement – while well documented over a period of decades – certainly has never been so brazenly (and breezily) conceded in public.
That’s your council president, folks. Rest assured that the civilized world isn’t laughing with him.
A full catalogue of the evening’s many grating reminders that our sitting city council, as currently constituted by people who can’t get along, and artlessly “administered” by a president who has no desire to administer, is beyond my ability to relate this late in the evening, or perhaps ever.
Verily, you’re read it all before.
Another bizarre and contrived conspiracy theory, this one pertaining to the city’s sanitation contract, was excitedly unfurled, duly refuted, and the resolution calling for immediate action tabled with recommendation of cowardice. The resolution’s sponsor, CM Donnie Blevins, subsequently melted down publicly and began predicting reprisals, famine and locusts. In default mode, CM Steve Price prattled nonsensically about carts, horses and doing things little by little. CM Dan Coffey, an uncharacteristic voice of reason for most of the meeting, lost his religion in an outburst against STEWART, but for once, you can’t blame the Wizard of Westside. Candidate STEWART’s pneumatic prodding is a pestilence of Biblical proportions.
Unfortunately, most ordinances requiring substantive decision making were endlessly debated sans direction from the chair, then unceremoniously tabled so that the whole, endless, vituperative process of unregulated foolishness can flare up right where it left off. One that did come to a vote was defeated. It was the second reading of an effort by CM Coffey to overturn the savagely debated recent firefighter hiring ordinance and revert to previous practice.
The crowd in attendance openly hooted and jeered these diverse and assorted travesties. The gavel was silent as unreconstructed trogs heckled public officials. Voices were raised, screaming sessions erupted, and through it all CM Kochert remained utterly devoid of the slightest considerations of impartiality and subtlety in openly playing favorites in his role as presiding officer. By the standards of my well-deserved and uncontested ouster earlier this year, half-a-dozen could have been ejected last night, and were not.
As with Kochert’s sadly characteristic decision that breaking the law if perfectly fine so long as it enables him to score political points, his increasing unwillingness to exercise control and do something about the escalating chaos during council meetings reinforces a legacy of astounding underachievement that would be laughable if not so harmful to any hope of progress in the city of New Albany.
There is nothing novel or surprising in any of this. To consistently enable disruption and dysfunction is to expect disruption and dysfunction in return, and so it is. We can hope only that the cleansing power of the forthcoming elections will remove those impediments to professionalism that currently control the council.
The last thing Larry Kochert said to me Thursday night presumably was meant to be facetious: “You’re a fine citizen.”
I can’t say that I disagree with the councilman, seeing as one obligation of citizenship beyond the obvious imperative of obeying the law is the exercise of free speech -- to point in the direction of ward-heeling political hacks whose historically exaggerated powers now are diminishing, and to say clearly and without reservation:
“They're a big part of the problem, and they need to go away if we’re ever going to accomplish something in this town.”
But, barring a miracle, this council is not going to accomplish anything of substance for the remainder of the year -- unless one views fisticuffs as a form of legislative victory. The stakes for the city are far too high, but that’s the way it will be, in spite of well meaning efforts by a few council persons to reverse the trend. The obstructionists are too old to learn, too angry to compromise, too dense to “see the big picture,” or all three at once.
There’s no love coming from the current group, and if you care about the city of New Albany, it may be time to go to the mattresses.
It can no longer be doubted that we’re on our own.
But, barring a miracle, this council is not going to accomplish anything of substance for the remainder of the year -- unless one views fisticuffs as a form of legislative victory. The stakes for the city are far too high, but that’s the way it will be, in spite of well meaning efforts by a few council persons to reverse the trend. The obstructionists are too old to learn, too angry to compromise, too dense to “see the big picture,” or all three at once.
There’s no love coming from the current group, and if you care about the city of New Albany, it may be time to go to the mattresses.
It can no longer be doubted that we’re on our own.
Am I reading this correctly? Tony Toran took on, of all the myriad ordinance violations in New Albany, that of a candidate putting up campaign signs where they shouldn't be? He acted immediately and got them all removed?
ReplyDeleteCan we get such swift action on the ordinance violations that really matter?
Great post! I'm still waiting for a report where something "adult" actually happens at one of these meetings. It seems like this is one of the longest Leslie Neilson movies ever. I'm just waiting for the line of, "Let's be adults about this, Mr. Poopy pants," being used.
ReplyDeleteAnn
ReplyDeleteOf course the answer is yes, he did, and your sarcasm is noted. I believe we all know and understand the problems associated with non-enforcement, and furthermore, we see that they extend across all political lines, and have for decades.
Perhaps if you were to witness DICK STEWART'S antics, it would be easier to grasp the real point of the matter, as I offered it for the appreciation of you and others who possess the ability to discern. Unfortunately, your neighbor's cameras were absent last evening.
If it were up to me, and I discussed this at length at Tuesday's Board of Public Works meeting, we'd pull down every sign that goes up, all the time. We'd ban political signage, "we buy houses" signage, "girls softball" signage and every other nasty, ugly reminder of the redneck in us all.
Perhaps we might ask: If STEWART and Kochert are to collaborate on a set piece of political theater, why not make it about something that "really matters," and not signage?
The infantilism and juvenilia that characterized this phenomenon last evening, and which continues to be the hallmark of council meetings, is the real and lasting issue.
As is the council president's pride in joining STEWART in adolescent pranks that involve illegality. Perhaps you need to start attending again, and see the school yard behavior in all its damning manifestations.
hmmm... I am trying to piece this puzzle together...
ReplyDeleteOUr council president, whom we know has allready demonstrated he has no problem with selectively discriminating against those who would like to speak in the public speaking portion of council meetings....
Now in a public meeting he willfully admits he knowingly violated election laws...
Not that he is alone in this, the powers that be to flex their enforcementary muscles in regards to ordinance violations will swiftly and readily pursue such violations as long as it is in response to an opposing political persons actions...
I am just having trouble understanding why this community is not progressing faster...Try as I might, I just can not figure that one out....
I can't get too worked up about somebody knowingly ignoring election laws by putting signs where they aren't permitted.
ReplyDeleteI'm more concerned with those who are knowingly ignoring ordinances, and their citation and enforcement.
I just hope the sign removal SWAT team picked up some garbage while they were out removing campaign signs from our well-manicured, carefully tended public rights of way.
Ann, you're preaching to the choir. You know, I know, we all know that what you're saying is right and reasonable.
ReplyDeleteNow, will you join me in publicly condemning the adolescent (and yes, illegal) charades of the council president, noting that as examples go, his is an exceedingly poor one?
As Ann noted and you agreed with, the "signgate" is pretty small potatoes. Probably could have been handled better all the way around.
ReplyDeleteWith all the blowing that MR. DICK STEWART was doing last night, I never once heard him admit that he was wrong. He was wrong for putting the signs there and he was wrong for accusing the city of stealing. Nor did I hear the council president admit his error, although to be fair, there was little time left for him to acknowledge it. Assuming that he wanted to.
Hey, folks. We're trying to change the culture here. Dismissing the Kochert/STEWART violations is hardly the way to do that.
ReplyDeleteAnimus and/or disappointment with the current administration (and I discern the former) is no reason to start handing out excuse slips to the president of the council and his poodle.
If I read the posting properly, DICK brought photographic proof of his own misdemeanor, confessed in a public meeting, and his co-conspirator testified to his own culpability. Beyond the fact that there is no longer ANY doubt that Kochert is a Republican in Democratic Party clothing, just one question remains.
Were fines levied to pay for the city time used to enforce the sign ordinance? And if not, why not? There's your scandal, Yvonne.
Agreed, and I'd note simply that I've been hammering away at the signage issue AS PART of the overall cleanliness conundrum for at least a year and a half, perhaps more.
ReplyDeleteI've spent time this week trying to initiate a program similar to that of Operation Brightside in Louisville, which stated very sketchily, would recruit volunteers to help educate people about these rules, pull down illeagl signage, and play a part, albeit small, in beautifying the city.
It has to be fair, it has to be consistent, and I believe that a large measure of volunteer involvement would help to ensure that it is. Isn't that what we want, citizen involvement?
Whether any of it comes to fruition, I'll continue to do it myself.
You know, all of it has to start somewhere, doesn't it?
I'm glad people like Ann are having a good day today. I really am. But it's hard to have good days when you must sit through the primeval chicanery of a council meeting like the one last night, and watch as the council president plays favorites, smirks -- yes, smirks -- at an audience member who offered a sincere question, and merrily admits that he doesn;t obey his own ordinance.
Whether that ordinance is great or small, how do we justify hurling sarcasm at the enforcement of it, and give the perpetrator a free pass? Doesn't it have to start somewhere?
I'm curious. Which of the candidates for city office were in attendance last evening? Besides the aggrieved MR. STEWART?
ReplyDeleteThanks heavens, I wasn't at the meeting to see the shenanigans.
ReplyDeleteBut if it is accurately reported here, and the meeting was not managed and conducted properly by him, then indeed, Mr. Kochert was in the wrong.
Did Mr. Stewart sign up properly? Did he speak during the appropriate portion of the meeting? Was he given a reasonable period of time, but not longer, to address the council? I may not understand the current protocol for Council meetings, but can't someone address a non-agenda item if they sign up on the correct sheet? If that's the way it's being conducted, then I guess Stewart could say what he had to say, as long as he followed the process. I've been at a lot of Council meetings where citizens have signed up and discussed topics that have no relevancy whatsoever (not that I agree with it, but the public portion of the meeting has always borne such comments).
If the crowd hooted and jeered, Mr. Kochert should have gotten that under control immediately. He shouldn't selectively enforce disruptive behavior.
However, if we are going to delve into elected officials breaking laws on their private time, we've got a few more people to look at than Mr. Kochert.
On a more positive note, if you need some help with the Brightside-type program, let me know. Earthly Goods would be happy to be a sponsor.
That's right, Ceece.
ReplyDeleteAll4word:
The council candidates I saw other than DICK STEWART were Theresa Timberlake (1st), Maury Goldberg (3rd) and Shirley Baird (at-large). However, several of the declared candidates I’ve yet to meet. Larry Scharlow was there, too.
Ann:
DICK signed up for the first period of public comments, which now must pertain to items on the agenda for the meeting. A second period of comment time has been added at the end, these intended to be for general topics.
Essentially, DICK placed a paragraph of material about the firefighter hiring ordinance at the beginning and end of his prepared comments, with these clumsily sandwiched around his political persecution diatribe. When he launched into the diatribe, CM Kochert did nothing until council members (Messer, perhaps, and maybe Crump) objected and said it was appropriate for the end comment time. Only then, as the crowd began getting unsettled, did Kochert rule against STEWART and moved his comments to the end of the meeting. By then, the chaos was well rooted.
Furthermore, STEWART and his front-row gallery consistently interrupted other speakers at various ties throughout the evening, especially (surprise) those city officials who’ve been targeted by the jihad. Kochert did absolutely nothing beyond half-heartedly clicking the gavel at odd intervals, and of course, as is my point, it all made sense four hours later when Kochert admitted to helping STEWART plant his signs in the first place. Big or small ordinance, it doesn’t matter; it’s simply breathtaking for the council president to so freely acknowledge his own role in such childishness – not to mention lawbreaking.
Ask virtually anyone at the meeting outside of your neighbor and the ones sitting with her in the front row, and they’ll agree with the bulk of what I’ve reported about the meeting on this blog. Had the camera been present last night (hmm), I’d bet money that almst anyone watching it would reach the same conclusion.
For most of the evening, the meeting was completely out of control. For most of the evening, Kochert took no actions to make the situation better. For most of the evening, Kochert openly took sides. It was a farce – and let me tell you, I’ve seen plenty of them.
I concur with All4word. There’s your investigation, guys.
It sounds like Stewart should have been cut off immediately when he wandered off-topic. It's a waste of everyone's time to let the meeting operate in an unprofessional way.
ReplyDeleteRe: the openly-admitted ordinance violation, though. Day in and day out, we have innumerable parties openly violating the ordinances, and we can all see it--no photos are required. Neglecting the pursuit of those seems to me to be as serious a matter (probably even more so) as letting a Council meeting get out of control.
Heres how I take this.
ReplyDeleteWhen one of the most powerful positions in our cities government, knowingly and willfully commits an ordinance violation, and an infraction of election laws, then publicly admits that he does so, and a front runner for the forthcoming election provides photographic eveidence of this violation, but yet want to cry theft when some one removes the violating signs, folks we have a real clear veiw of the entire scope of the problems in this town.
Had CM Larry lied about his involvement, and that came out, people would demand he step down as council president, whether its an ordinance infraction, misdemeanor, or felony, breaking the law is breaking the law, the penalties are stiffer but the principles are the same. Since he publicly admitted that he took part in the violation, and apparrently did so with a smirk, I mean come on, he is supposed to be one of the people in charge of protecting our community from situations like this.
Good for the city in ripping down the signs, but on the same note, there are a lot of good people here suffering from more serious and dangerous code violations, and what is done about that? Nothing.
If there is political statements to be made against the fracturous sects with in our government, action is swift, with no consideration given as to how busy the city attorney is in order to take action, BOTH Dick Stewart, and CM King Larry should be fined for code violations for each and every sign the placed illegally. And to be honest, given the actions over the course of the last 3 months, King Larry should be forced to resign as council president, given the facts that he is either unable, or unwilling to full fill the duties of the job.
Exactly, Chris.
ReplyDeleteNA,
ReplyDeleteMr. Messer was the one who brought up about MR. STEWART speaking on a non agenda item. MR. STEWART replied along the lines of, "I knew someone would try to stop me but I did not think it would be you, Jack". Then Mr. Kochert promised MR. STEWART that he would be FIRST in line when the public is allowed to speak about anything at the end of the council meeting. Of course, those allowed to speak then are usually called in the order that they sign up. Guess what, MR. STEWART got to speak first despite being last on the sign up sheet.
NA's account is accurate. My first "full" council meeting and you do have to see it to believe it.
Well, knowing how New Albany operates, I'll be willing to bet that someone, somewhere, is working on getting Kochert in trouble for his publicly-admitted transgression.
ReplyDeleteWhat ugliness will the next Council meeting reveal . . .
One other thing . . maybe this isn't correct, but somebody told me that even convicted felons can hold public office.
ReplyDeleteMaybe that explains things. . .
The latest conspiracy(sanitation)was shot down in big, bright beautiful flames last night. 2 separate sets of photographs of supposedly illegal, immoral, or i-something activity were shown last night. I figure the next meeting will have photos of flying saucers. Makes about as much sense. Might actually make more.
ReplyDeleteThe real shame of it is that our current government is still accurately representative of the city at large.
ReplyDelete