Monday, January 30, 2006

For New Albany to inaugurate a rental property reform program with teeth would be Priceless -- and it must occur, with or without him.

During the course of idly Googling “rental property” and “accountability,” we’ve come across an incisive presentation of an aggressive rental property reform program that is discussed within the context of an economic vision plan formulated by a wide spectrum of community leaders in Vallejo, California.

Readers will recall that the question of rental property inspections was one of many clumsily sidestepped by 3rd District Councilman Steve Price in his recent interview with NA Confidential.

And yet the largely uncontrolled and unregulated proliferation of rental properties contributes -- in some ways, enables and perpetuates -- the culture of unaccountability and dysfunction that must be reversed if the city of New Albany is to move into the future.

In no uncertain terms, and contrary to CM Price’s transparently lukewarm (and toothless) advocacy of “cleanliness” and “homeowner’s … responsibility,” we feel that the precepts elucidated in the Vallejo Rental Property Program below eloquently testify to the need for New Albany’s elected officials to publicly identify and confront the abuses intrinsic to those rental properties that are poorly maintained and intentionally neglected, often (but not always) by absentee landlords who profit from the vulnerability of those in society who rent living space, but more insidiously, bear a disproportionate share of the responsibility for the degradation of New Albany’s neighborhoods.

But this is only one part of what is needed to help reclaim our neighborhoods.

In 2005, the city of New Albany made an important start by establishing the position of ordinance enforcement officer. Concurrent with the work of the OEO and a rental property program like Vallejo’s, we must have a functioning city court and a full-time city attorney to complete the cycle of accountability and to establish a foundation upon which to build a better quality of life.

It simply isn’t enough to have rules on the book. There must be the means of enforcement.

And there must be the political will to provide those means. Do we have it? We know who doesn’t. Who does?

It isn't enough to say that we can't afford it, because we can't afford not to try.

None of this is to imply that rental properties should be eradicated by Stalinist executive order, or that the full range of community housing options should not include apartment living, either downtown in older homes that have been turned into apartments, or in suburban apartment complexes built to order. Renting is part of life … and what we need most is to regulate it for the greater good of the community.

As the following clearly indicates, the benefits of rental property inspections are many, impacting both the quality of neighborhood life and economic growth in the city as a whole. Add to this the mechanisms of a city court and a full-time legal presence, and the benefits are obvious.

As with all things even remotely progressive, Steve “we can’t” Price already has opted out, so who among our elected officials intends to take the lead?

----

Vallejo's Economic Vision Process

Vallejo's Economic Vision came about through a series of meetings with community leaders, including civic entrepreneurs, elected officials, municipal professionals, education and health care, business and industry, tourism, neighborhood and environmental leaders.

The participants developed an economic vision based on the principle that a vibrant economy is necessary to achieve a healthy, proud community and a high quality of life. The vision confirms and reinforces the need for community partnerships to address the human, social and infrastructure needs of Vallejo as it moves toward economic sustainability.

The number one priority of the City Support Structure subcommittee of the economic vision process is to develop and implement a comprehensive program to ensure code compliance for rental property and landlord accountability.

With the Economic Vision Process determination that improving rental housing was a high priority of the City, a preexisting group, already looking at rental housing, was asked by the City to develop a solution. This group, comprised of the Chamber of Commerce, rental property interests, realtors, community members, Fighting Back Partnership, and others, had been meeting for over a year prior to the Vision process recommendations. The Rental Property Sub-group has been meeting for over two years developing a rental program that reflects the interests of all interest groups on the committee.

VALLEJO RENTAL PROPERTY PROGRAM

A Comprehensive Community Model

This is to be accomplished by developing, passing and implementing a new city ordinance that would, in part:
  • Contain an inspection process for all rental property
  • Impose fines for violations of the ordinance on property owners/property images
  • Establish a database of all rental property, and
  • Include an enforcement process
  • Would, as much as possible, be financially self supporting
Myriad benefits that would contribute to cleaner, safer neighborhoods are expected to result from the implementation of a rental inspection ordinance, and include:
  • Increased property values
  • Increased rental demand
  • Decreased general calls for police services
  • Decreased calls about rental property problems to Code Enforcement
  • Increased property management involvement in solving rental property issues

Why Does Vallejo Need a Rental Inspection Program?

Rental inspection programs are designed to accomplish three main goals:

  • To clean up rental stock
  • To improve the quality of life in neighborhoods
  • To increase the economic value of single family homes and other rental residences
---

Follow the links … there’s much more at the site itself.

To reiterate, if you're the elected official who's going to take the lead on this issue, please step forward.

Time's getting short.

6 comments:

  1. It will be a long while before anyone (elected official, that is) steps forward to take the lead on a rental inspection program, I fear.

    Mayor Overton tried it, and held a couple of public meetings to promote it. I think every owner of multi-rental properties in New Albany turned out for the meetings, and the atmosphere in the room was not pleasant.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Time to try again, then.

    Conditions change constantly. Obviously, cohesion from neighborhood associations is needed, but we have considerably better means of promoting the issue now as opposed to just a few years ago.

    In any event, it would be wonderful to smoke 'em out in this manner -- take photos during the public meetings, learn names, chat about matters.

    An information war needs to be unleashed against the abusers. The ones who're not abusers having nothing to fear, anyway -- right?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:18 AM

    Accountability seems to be a consistent theme in multiple blogs and on multiple topics for the New Albany area. I wonder why that is???

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Steve.

    Would you say that opposition to the proposal was expressed in partisan terms, i.e., I can see liberal Democrats (assuming there is such a thing here) being opposed to rental inspections because slumlords would pass along the costs to the underprivileged, and Republicans being opposed because they're in the pocket of "big" business (no offense, just conjecturing).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Given that the rental property problem affects all socio-economic levels and our current non-system has obviously failed, any elected or appointed official that's not willing to support a strong rental property reform program should be voted out of office and/or fired. This is especially true of those officials who specifically represent districts with a disproportionate concentration of rentals such as Price.

    The responsibility for improving the rental situation falls on every level of city government. The City Council can start the process by passing legislation that makes regular inspection mandatory and by funding the proper enforcement mechanisms. The Mayor can help by hiring a Building Commissioner that takes inspection and enforcement responsibilities seriously. At the very least, the person filling that role should recognize violations when he or she is coerced into viewing them, which isn’t the case now. Although he's due credit for doing so recently, Mr. Toran and the rest of the Board of Public Works shouldn't have to baby-sit.

    While Steve LaDuke raises some valid issues concerning potential areas of compromise in the actual rental ordinance requirements, there's no excuse at any level for not moving forward on the issue. Rental inspection/licensing programs have consistently worked in similar situations. Based on those successes, it also seems feasible to make such programs either entirely self-supporting or close enough that the investment to pay-off ratio is so favorable as to make a debate about cost irrelevant.

    If the Tribune is looking for a lead (and they damn well ought to be given their lackadaisical coverage lately), this is it. There are numerous stories and photo ops within walking distance. They could do a year-long series of features, starting with the headline Why Steve Price Doesn't Support Clean, Safe Housing, and continue on indefinitely without ever putting the keys in the ignition.

    As someone mentioned to me recently, there's a difference between apathy and malice. How long, though, do elected officials have to flaunt that apathy before it becomes maliciousness in effect?

    ReplyDelete