Monday, November 24, 2008

Open thread: City council recap, 2008?

The Common Council of the city of New Albany began the year 2008 with four newly elected members, and high hopes in progressive quarters owing to the long overdue breakup of the body’s Gang of Four obstructionists, two of whom sadly remain on the ramparts, diligently guarding against improvement. However, the year has been profoundly disappointing to date, which leads me to my question for the day:

Readers, what are your views of the council’s performance during this challenging year?

And, as a subtext, what of council president Jeff Gahan’s record in the top chair?

Off the top of my head, here’s a non-comprehensive overview.

Redistricting was imperiously scotched, with collateral damage to the concept of rule of law, and meaningful ordinance enforcement was teased but ultimately soft-pedaled, as always. In short, no progress whatsoever in addressing the core issue of the city's unwillingness or inability to follow its own rules.

Providentially, novelty lighters were successfully banned, meaning that children living in unregulated, sub-standard housing must rely on old-fashioned matches to light oil lamps.

In a time of economic uncertainty, the council was faced with difficult and protracted budget negotiations, and responded to them by wasting precious weeks on an ill-considered smoking ordinance that served only to set the table for future political gamesmanship.

There has been a barely disguised backdrop of political maneuvering on the ultimate non-privatization of (what else?) the city’s sewers, and street and sanitation departments, and the concurrent shadow of Guido’s hand hovering over all of it.

While many of us earnestly hoped that CM Gahan’s most recent turn as president might facilitate communication with those elements in the community best suited to achieve something – anything – the reverse has rather surprsingly been the case.

Instead of emulating the open source Barack Obama, the president’s rare opaque signaling has more closely resembled Kim Jong Il’s codes, and while the nuts and bolts of council guidance are in better hands than when Slippery Larry reigned supreme, one can’t honestly confuse them for anything like leadership.

But maybe you disagree. If so, let me have it.

If you're reading, Even Deeper Throat, can you provide CM Gahan's version?

I have a busy next couple of days, so as the Highwayman continues work on his analysis of LOIT, let us know what you think about this year’s council record.

If I were the grading sort, I'd have it hovering around D+ or C-minus. If it weren't for John Gonder ...

5 comments:

Daniel Short said...

Did they get around to redrawing the districts as a judge with supposed authority has so nicely asked them to do? Nope? My grade is D minus with an A for effort in the legal disobedience category.

Highwayman said...

Aside from the random selectivity of who is allowed to speak to non agenda items during agenda items only comment time or who is held to the imposed time limit of comments versus who isn't, here is my take.

I feel now as I felt in January that CM Gahan could have been much more effective as a councilman sitting at the table than he has been sitting at the head of the table.

He's forgone an opportunity to perhaps have advanced how New Albany is viewed by the metro area in exchange for (I guess) political gains elsewhere that we can't see.

As to the council as a whole this year has been, with very few exceptions, time wasted.

I'll give them kudo's for supporting the roofing company from Louisville coming to Mt. Tabor Road, the Purdue expansion, Conforma Clad's growth, and the like.

However the benifits from those are somewhere far down the road.

The improvements to everyday life in New Albany in housing, code enforcement, downtown retail, infrastructure & police protection are minimal at best.

Christopher D said...

Mr. Gonder definately gets a strong A in my books. If nothing else he has remained firmly connected with the community, and remains accessable to those in the community (online and offline).
Mr. McLaughlin has remained silent to almost a troubling level, but that is far greater than grandstanding.
Mr. Gahan has had moments of lucidity, but for the most part seems to be the reincarnation of King Larry.
All in all I would give the council a C, and I know the grade would be much better all around if we could grade on a bell curve, as we still have a couple of class clowns who feel it is more important to be disruptive and to be a pulpiteer.

Jeff Gillenwater said...

As I believe even Gonder mentioned, the council doesn't have a legislative agenda.

As I believe the New Albanian mentioned, when you aren't trying to accomplish anything specific, you usually don't.

G Coyle said...

Ummm, a legislative body without a legislative agenda. Interesting concept to ponder as the world crumbles.